Search results

Can you please elaborate on this 'intentional planning'. Are you saying that West Pakistan always wanted East Pakistan to separate and everything was a ruse to lure India into doing the dirty job for Pakistan?

Thank you, Nehru, for giving the Pakistanis a never ending khuji in their collective @sses and pushing them into a bottom less pit of identity crisis.

Jai Sia Ram a Vaanar Sena spotted.

Belur, April 3: Two small explosions about 15 minutes before the evening prayers were to start at Belur Math this evening broke window panes in the hall opposite the main temple where devotees leave their shoes. No one was injured. Monks in the Math said they heard two thuds at 5.45pm when...

@Joe Shearer, you are wasting your time. Our beloved country has already gone to the cows.

Once again it is not about the number of deaths. It has been made to look that way by your establishment so you don't ask the real questions. You should read the ICJ report sometimes. You will then realize what it is all about.

Someday you will realize that it is not about the number of deaths.

Yes, International Commission of Jurists, R. Sisson, L.E. Rose, Susan Browmiller etc. were all RAW agents. Maybe I should start posting NYT articles of that era.

Only Pakistan was to _completely_ withdraw her forces and citizens and hand over the administration to the 'local authority' who would then administer the evacuated land under direct supervision of UN. India was to only _reduce_ her troop strength. A plebiscite administrator will then be...

They might as well look for that pot of gold at the end of a rainbow or that twin horned unicorn. A mere tokenism - a last ditch attempt by Jinnah to bottle the genie that he had unleashed. Unfortunately, a genie once unleashed, can't be bottled.

Cite that actual resolution which was accepted by both parties as having 'superseded the initial requirement of requiring Pakistan to unilaterally demilitarize'. This happens when you make a claim through your posterior and then try to support it by googling. Article 25 is about 'decisions' of...

So can you. Cite the Article that says so. IWT contains, within itself, the mechanism for conflict resolution. Referencing other agreements therefore is redundant and is in fact ultra vires. So yes, it is a 'settled difference'. UNSC resolutions are not 'agreements'. PS: It is probably...

Whats with Pakistanis and chimp like chest thumping?

Yes. That narrows it down right to the dot. The best reference would have been this. Except that the extant UN resolutions don't impose any legal commitment on either side. And IWT is 'settled difference' whereas Simla Agreement is about unsettled differences. Reference was to interpretation...

Which resolutions did that? And don't refer to past debates. Just produce direct reference here. Just a FYI, India had accepted only two resolutions. Under Section VI even accepted resolutions are not enforceable, imagine what is the status of unaccepted resolutions. Simla Agreement is not...

Shimla Agreement prevents UN from doing anything other than 'offering' to mediate. They can never, ever, mediate unless India & Pakistan both agree. If just that act of 'offering' gives AM a huge boner, well, that's his problem, not ours.

Note the underlined part. That clause is applicable only to the 'line of control resulting from the ceasefire of December 17, 1971' which in itself is a reference to Karachi Agreement, 1949. As @Capt.Popeye correctly pointed out, Siachen was not delimited then. If you however argue about the...

You can catch him doing his mental gymnastics here as well.

Notice the spin here. The UN resolutions are being made out to be only about plebiscite. It is not. There is demilitarization, then handing over of administration of the part of Kashmir that is currently occupied by Pakistan, to 'local authority' and then a plebiscite. Since the first two...

If it can't be implemented how it 'fits' the Simla Agreement, is beyond me. However, post Simla Agreement the only 'peaceful means of dispute resolution' is converting LoC into IB. Nothing else is acceptable by India.