Search results

No need for conspiracy theories.

That's all? I heard about this, I thought he punched some journalist for asking a question. Bloody journalist got what he deserved.

Sorry Indians.

This was written by Nadeem Paracha, I'm guessing?

How does that further world peace?

Are they still talking about that?

Swiss Altaf Bhai

Yeah you're right, but who wants to listen to the truth when we can listen to the Iranian version?

But Syria can't even fight a short war.

Syrian capabilities are only used against the civilians of Syra by the murderous Assad regime.

[edited, please delete]

Of course not. Do the masses care? That's your view. And Ayub Khan's rule signalled an era of economic prosperity for Pakistan. You say Zia, I say Bhutto.

I don't like journalists. They interfere where they don't belong. And the friend who liked my post is the same one who started this thread.

Yeah around the beginning of the 19th century the Saudis fought against the Turks and took control of the Hijaz.

Who cares?

Saudi Arabia is also developing other industries. And Iran is supportive of the US invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq just as it was supportive of the Russian invasion of Afghanistan.

The Arabs of the Peninsula were never traitors. It was the Egyptians and the Palestinians who were traitors. They stabbed the Turks in the back and yet even today the Turks support the Palestinians. The Egyptians and Palestinians were ungrateful traitors who always took advantage of the...

I don't understand the problem? The Quran is supposed to be burned not thrown away to be disposed of, right?

The reason one does not see popular uprisings against military rulers who take power in a coup is that the civilian rulers have proven themselves extremely corrupt and ineffectual, while the military is disciplined and does its duty. Also, the military establishment always provides better ruling...

Dhoop Kinare