Search results

Care to elaborate?

:rofl: pathan bhaiyon ke irade kuch sahi nai lagte

I am not against the ban. I can't say that I am in favour of the ban, but I am definitely against those hypocritical Muslims criticizing it.

I guess you don't know much about these countries. KSA has implemented many aspects of that system in social life, but the system is not the one that some people are ranting and raving about. Iran is a Shia theological state, they most definitely have not implemented any such system.

The British had been keeping the Ottomans on life-support for decades. They decided it was time for them to go, and for the breakup of Turkey, to which the Ottoman Vahid readily agreed. Only Mustafa Kemal Ataturk and the nationalist forces fought to save Turkey and liberate the people. He was...

If Ataturk hadn't removed the Sultanate, the British would have. To ensure the survival of Turkey, the Turkish government had to work in interests of world powers such as Britain at the time. Anyways, what had the Sultanate done to justify its continued existence?

Please provide examples of successful Islamic states.

I generally enjoy Paracha's writing, but occasionally he goes overboard with an article for which there is no need. This was a completely uncalled-for and unnecessary article.

Very good. Mubarak ho Bhabi.

Wasting money on this rather than on schools or hospitals, which would have a wider reach, so many properly-running schools could be established and administrated at a fraction of the cost for creating this Sesame Street show with limited viewership and little power to reach to much of the public.

Hizb-ut-Tahrir, that is enjoying living in London, talking of united Ummah, while getting fat off of the scraps of the British government.

But if you consider that Turkey came into being almost from complete annihilation and break-up post-WWI, you can see Turkey's success. To have come into such a position, to have come so far, would have been unthinkable in post-War Europe, and even a couple of decades ago.

No one deserves to lead until they have succeeded in getting the popular approval of the people, through the vote (in regular circumstances of civilian rule, not in the extreme circumstances requiring military takeover). Imran may be sincere and honest, and he may have done a lot for Pakistan...

I used to occasionally, socially among a few friends who smoked. But I never smoked on my own. One of the problems was that most of my close friends didn't smoke so we would sometimes go out of our way to friends who did smoke and get a few cigarettes for me, because I didn't use my own money on...

This idea was valid before Iran's revolution. It is no longer viable.

Don't have to attack Afghan refugees just because of this man's comments. Afghans are also suffering.

Imran bhai sudhar rahe hai :D

Bhutto's appeasements, as you call them, is what started the Islamization and, in fact, general radicalization of Pakistan. It was then that the idea that a person's could use his own moral values to restrict another person's actions became a part of government policy, thus encouraging it. By...

Zardari is a weak president even domestically. Also, why would he be asked to bend over? Kuch inke irade sahi nahi lag rahe hai..

Today Pakistan doesn't make Punjabi the official language even though it it spoken by most of the people of Pakistan. Punjabis don't complain. They know that it isn't disrespectful, there are other reasons. And stop this nonsense that Liaquat Ali Khan only proposed to make Urdu the national...