Search results

Ah, yes then that makes sense.

You did present some facts about Ethnic cleansing, India's aggression etc., And then you brought in Nehru's statements to prove that he was lying and didnt do as promised. In an attempt to expose India's double standards. But Joe, just pointed out WHY Nehru said what he said, and he explained it...

Of course it is derogatory. It was meant as such. Even I thought that, but it seems we do have an air base at Farkhor. Farkhor Air Base - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wait I am a little bit confused. Doesnt India already operate the Farkhor Air base? In Tajikistan? And has stationed a squad of Mig 29s on there. So this is something political between India and Russia. We can achieve it. Maybe throw the Russians a bone by ordering an extra 100 Su 30 MKIs...

Repetitive post self deleted

Since it is a history thread, why dont you ignore the parts that is someone's point of view and concentrate on refuting his argument with relevant facts? Calling every bit of relevant history and evidence as "twisted", without even justifying HOW it is twisted and then proceeding to use an...

I am quoting from your own post: “Towards the end of 1948…. it became clear to me then that we would never get the conditions which were necessary for a plebiscite… so I ruled out the plebiscite for all practical purposes.” So as you can see, the 47 war came to an end...

Dude, just go fix Pakistan first. Lets create separate sections for Pakistan too. 1. Shia Sunni conflicts 2. Other Muslim minority group conflicts 3. Non Muslim oppression 4. Poverty 5. Flawed education system 6. Defunct railway system 7. Religious extremism 8. Feudal system 9. Balochistan...

The United Nations resolution calling for a plebiscite is invalid at this point. The resolution called for Pakistan to withdraw all tribesmen and others who had entered the region for the purpose of fighting and that India leave only the minimum number of troops needed to keep civil order...

For Ticker it doesnt tick. FaujHistorian started the thread. TheFalseHistorian (Ticker) is invested in derailing it :lol:

No one is living in a dreamworld except you. Firstly, India has always contended that Jammu and Kashmir, the entirety of it, belongs to India. And it does, based on the instrument of Accession. It is part of sovereign India that Pakistan has occupied. Secondly, the United Nations resolution...

:lol: It is disputed only by Pakistan. Not by India. India contends, and rightfully so based on the Instrument of Accession, that Jammu and Kashmir is an integral part of India. ALL of it. Aksai Chin+Azad Kashmir+Whatever is a part of India right now. When we have a Line of Control demarcated...

The fact that they dont is the problem. That is what extremism is. But HOW would one do it? Your post doesnt address that. I think they need a more liberal outlook on life, culture, religion and their general world view. For this I believe the only way is to educate them and improve their living...

Yes I have to concur with the previous poster. LCA is indeed better than the JF 17. Yes the JF 17 is inducted and the LCA isnt, but from avionics to build material etc., the LCA is a much better aircraft. However, combat performance is not something we can comment on, unless and until both...

Amen to that!! :lol:

Yes Pakistan has no problem with any of her neighbors. Nice try. :lol: What about your border dispute with Afghanistan? :lol: The only other country that you have borders with is Iran. Even with them, you have a good-not-so-good relations. Because Pakistan is a majority Sunni Muslim nation...

This is not overconfidence. Infact apart for the peace process and other developments, Pakistan is not even spoken about that frequently on Indian media, although it is the country most spoken about. This is purely a judgement based on capabilities - both qualitative and quantitative. And yet...

Wait what? :lol: Its India that suffers from terrorist activities in Pakistan. Not the other way around. And if Pakistan thinks India is sponsoring terrorism, and wants to attack something, they are welcome. They can send their planes. They will go back home walking. Or maybe they wont go...

Ah well. I apologize, I misread. But then again, what you said doesnt make sense. If those 1.8 billion population includes educated folks, what use is it if you sacrifice them? It was you that said, we are ready to die. All of us. And if all the educated folks wanna die too, then they are as...

Yes those people who herd Sheep in the middle east, those Taliban dudes that go around shooting little girls, and those poor folks in Tribal Areas in Pakistan are all much more educated and richer than me. Get your head examined. 1.8 billion is no big sacrifice?. Pretty much shows the mullah...