Search results

Just as much as boyfriend(s). I don't see any problem with it.

Yeah, and that concerns me a lot. If Pakistan leaves them, they still have US to watch over them with their nuclear shield. Is that why many Muslims don't like Al Saud dynasty? Sure, they have the equipment, but they don't have the strategists. That's why they were getting their arses kicked...

Ahaha. Why would you want to serve in the most overrated military in the world?

Fluck yeah! Something like "inquiring about it will halt development projects." Beech please!!

Um, why was I tagged? Lol

WHAAAAAAA? Son, we don't speak Klingon.

Fair enough [emoji2]

Not commenting on the several troll wars going on here, it is evident that who will lose. Both governments will remain at an impasse. Both militaries shall keep going back and forth without any progress. Media of both sides will keep spreading propaganda, either with or without the governments'...

Lol and all that shite doesn't even make sense. For example, why would we need a carrier? Just why?

Lol I get your point. But the whole point of getting nukes was to provide a deterrent against India's nukes. So if India and nukes are mentioned in the same sentence, I'm not surprised. But Iran?

Nah, secularists are amazing. It's the Islamist Turks that bug me. Erdogan, y'know.

5 rupees wali.

........... That generalization is inaccurate. a) Islam wasn't forced on me. b) I am not the result of slavery, since my ancestors were the slavers. c) Also ain't a child or rape. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hashmi https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mughal_emperors

Catch ya later, sir.

Doing that also seals India's destruction, and Pakistan's. Come on. Let's be logical in our argument, and not use rhetoric.

I have been able to find one airbase in Balochistan. It is located near Quetta, and is used by two PAF squadrons. But these squadrons use F-7s. So I'm not sure about the second statement. But like I said, it depends on who's being invaded. Most probably the invader would lose. And nukes??? Why...

Be a little more specific. Who is being invaded here? Then, perhaps I can answer your question. But in any case, armour can be ruled out since the entire Sistan-Balochistan area is mountainous.

a) the Shah was a friend of Pakistan, I admit and admire that. But as a Hashmi, I must speak the truth. And the truth is that I cannot stay blind to the crimes committed by SAVAK and their allied agencies. Plus, while I despise any theocracy, present day Iran is a lot better than it was under...

It's sad indeed. Such people are a disgrace for the whole country. After all, Shias have worked hard for this great country ever since Pakistan came into being. Hell, Jinnah was a Shia! But I guess Saudi arse kissers don't see things like that.

a) I don't have Iranian friends here. You haven't met my Iranian friends. b) Again, that's what we call "confirmation bias"; judging a situation just by your personal experience.