What's new

Search results

  1. S

    My “conspiracy” theory and what China should do about it

    I completely disagree with your assessment. Libya and Qaddafi in essence is entirely cooperative when it comes to distributing oil to the West especially Europe, and this unrest hurt Europe more than anyone. It's not just as simple a situation as installing a pliable puppet, Qaddafi is already a...
  2. S

    "Communist Chinese liars are all Racist"

    I believe racism is a universal trait, it just occurs more in certain cultures and fester more in certain environment than others. For example racism is still deeply rooted in American culture, though not mainstream still exist today and is divided into many different interpretations of racism...
  3. S

    Global powers should ensure China rise peacefully

    Do you have a Hitler complex? Or perhaps you are easy to judge and misunderstand someone else's opinion? The author never once imply to how China should be run, it only gave in my opinion a very fair and favourable outlook on how business should be conducted between regional nations. Before...
  4. S

    Global powers should ensure China rise peacefully

    You should reread the whole article, instead of posting a reply based on a misleading title. I am sure he knows alot more about world geopolitics than you do.
  5. S

    US: If China goes to war we will make it go back 100 years

    Gambit reread what i said, i made no corelation between 4th generation fighter jets and 4th generation warfare, it is you who preached something completely unrelated, for the purpose of this discussion lets stick to assymetric warfare. As Notorius_eagle pointed out something of substance, you...
  6. S

    US: If China goes to war we will make it go back 100 years

    Gambit has not been very helpful with his military theologies, I need a real expert who knows the functioning of such systems not a preacher, when I talk about radar system Gambit says we could destroy them with jets (like in Iraq). If i ask him how would your Jets get pass the enemies...
  7. S

    US: If China goes to war we will make it go back 100 years

    Gambit, i do not have the time nor will to go through your lawyer style attacks, again i said bring scientific facts to the table, the fact you said this: "- Prevention This is where the fear of destruction discourage transmissions. No transmit, no air defense possible. - Disruption This is...
  8. S

    US: If China goes to war we will make it go back 100 years

    Just a final word before I log out, i like explanations on how the USA can maintain round the clock strike force to negate Chinese military defense, how would they get their aircraft carriers close enough to evade or bypass the Chinese naval forces and yet not easily strike down by chinese...
  9. S

    US: If China goes to war we will make it go back 100 years

    No i clearly know what i am talking about as i read about it before, i just want to know what you are talking about beyond the bombings of obsolete Iraqi command and control systems.
  10. S

    US: If China goes to war we will make it go back 100 years

    Then why are you posting something that is 6 years old?
  11. S

    US: If China goes to war we will make it go back 100 years

    Again what you are saying is all hypothetical. How would the USA disable the Chinese sattelite and radar system, you would need to explain to me step by step for your arguments to be taken seriously. How was the Iraqi radar system disabled in the first place? Hint the biggest contributors are...
  12. S

    US: If China goes to war we will make it go back 100 years

    The way I see it, the only way the USA can do that would be to launch a massive first wave of pre-emptive nuclear strikes on the major Chinese cities around the coast. I think the political, economic and overall implication of that makes this scenario extremely unlikely. Apart from this option...
Back
Top Bottom