Search results

UN to actually to make a statement on this matter.

Okay, it is. Be happy now.

What exactly did India do to cancel this session? Not once did any state accuse India of Human Rights Violations after abrogation of article 5. (And, it doesnt matter what you say on a forum, what matters is what heads of state say).

And yet nobody said anything to signify this. Unrelated:- NASA chief made comments after Mission Shakti was put on leash soon after US state dept. Other UNSC members recognized India's right to defend herself after Pulwama. You are right, India has shedded her image as the tolerant state that...

strategic narrative is built over years through constant meetings on the issue. UNSC is discussing kashmir after 50 years! Narrative was built by India because of which 3 members (including China!) have said its a bilateral matter between India and Pakistan. What Pakistan is doing is not...

No, its not their way of showing that they arent taking any sides coz they already said that they support India's decision to abrogate article 370 and 35A.

I am aware, i just didn't want to be the one to show the mirror of whats about to come to the ignorant member here. But the thing is where are those countries who are saying what India did is wrong and if there are any where do they stand on global stage? Turkey stands with Pakistan, but lets...

USA called it Bilateral issue after India removed article 370. So did Russia, that Pak and India need to resolve it bilaterally. Even China after claiming Aksai Chin said that Pak and India need to talk and resolve it bilaterally. Russia has already said that if China has called a meeting, we...

Do u really think that anything will come out of that meeting for Pakistan when we need just 1 member on our side? Its not going to be any action. It will probably be like a statement by Russia that Both need to resolve it bilaterally.

Yeah, and India won't do anything to BD.... Are u a kid who lives in a fantasy world?

Dude, you should try Stand up comedy!! PS:- In that case India could literally build a road from WB leading to Meghalaya right thru the heart of BD.

With such logic, whole of Bangladesh should surrender its territory to India.

It could be any fucking thing, the point is that civilians flocked the area before it was sanitized by the forces, like they do after every encounter. And even if it was Army's grenade, so what? They would have diffused it after the encounter. Its totally the fault of the victims themselves.

You need to read what happened.. It was an unexploded bomb that exploded when civilians flocked the encounter site as soon as the terrorists were neutralised even though army hadn't sanitized the area.

You made grammatical and spelling mistakes. Also your sentence formation also isn't upto the mark. :)

Sure....:cheers: Im not new here....you can tell that to Jharriis who i suppose is about to get blocked anytime...time is running out, hurry up.

Thats a good joke. I have been on the receiving of many abuses towards my religion even though I never hurt anyone's sentiments and that includes all hindus collectively being called worms by senior members.

It was 3 billion, thats peanuts for India. Im not sure how much of that was India's export, but even if we consider it was 50% then thats 1.5bn that Pakistan doesn't have to seek from IMF or China or KSA. :) But then you will have to buy that from somewhere else sooner or later so..:/ Pakistan...

We could be having the same talks when India had just started moving troop in kashmir. But its nothing more than speculation.

You do realise that S400 wont be operating alone right? It will have cover of Aakash, XRSAM and QRSAM....