Or instead of waiting for an attack to happen in MY soil ,Pakistan actually sees the evidence provided by India and takes action against the Mumbai perpetrators and until that happens there is no resumption of dialogue.
After all Pakistan is really eager for the talks to resume for some...
[B]
DAWN.COM | World | Singh moves to pacify Indian opposition
There can be no-talks if one side is not at the negotiating table.
It does not validate Pakistan's position until the talks are resumed.
Manmohan Singh has to answer to the Parliament and the majority are against resumption...
Our government and leader stated that no talks till Pakistan acts on terror and there will be nothing on the contrary.Also it will not be allowed by the opposition.
What is obvious to you is of no consequence Sir.
Pretty hypocritical since it is Pakistani soil being used for terrorism.
You actually expect India to talk when were attacked by Pakistani elements?
Unless Pakistan takes steps to dismantle it's terror network there should be no talks. De linking Composite dialogue is akin to letting Pakistan...
Both India and Pakistan are under US pressure,the Americans want Pakistan to commit it's whole military to fight the Taliban.They can't do that till PA is occupied with India.
Anyway until 26/11 perpetrators brought to justice there should be no talks especially on Kashmir.
Atleast the LCA gave us a functional aeronautical developmental base.The best would be to take the FGFA project with Russia forward atleast we won't be late in introducing fifth generation fighters in our inventory while we work on the MCA.
I think that the IA is too caught up in Russian tech that they're no even willing to give the Arjun a try even if it's proven to be superior to the T-90.I mean come on the tank had to be certified by a foreign company.
It's faster,got more speed,less ground pressure,...