Search results

I think india will keep kashmir on backburner for another decade or so, meanwhile it will try to decrease militancy, combat terrorism, increase development of kashmir, and bring ppl into electoral process. once india is confident enough, it will conduct some kind of plebiscite. kashmir...

there are checks and balances in democracy, so that no one party/individual can rule with out public/majority consent.unlike dictatorship.

and see the irony, you sought the help of same Delhi to free Muslim Bengal from the domination of 'Islam'abad. :P

wow, wat a good ploy! I will also use it. I am a telugu and I HATE india, we telugus are struggling for our independence from the CRUEL india. I request pak not to attack andhara, when there is a war. plzzzzzzzz. ps: I think all indians from kashmir to kanyakumari should try this trick, it...

then, can you atleast give india assurance that those groups that are fighting for 'kashmiri freedom' wont target innocent civilians and foreigners?:hitwall: and chanakya is much more than Machiavelli. his genius extends in all directions. he was a religious, political, social and financial...

firstly, I would take that as not able(or willing) to give the assurance. then secondly, when you accuse indian consulates of something, you need to prove it my dear. plz do that. not on this forum but internationally. as for pakistan's case is concerned, pak prez zardari has agreed that...

ha ha.... extremist hindus eh? can a muslim in pakistan convert his religion? coming from the 'secular' pakistanis, this is really really funny.:rofl: and get your facts before you distort them, read the posts of my fellow indians, so that you get the grasp of the situation. then you can go...

ok, so pak has done everything there is to do, is it? then, can pak give india assurance that pak's territory will not be used for launching any attack in india(excluding kashmir) in future? if yes, then there is nothing more to say.:eek: if no, then obviously there are lot of terrorists and...

I am sure india-US will reach that phase where we support each other 70% of the time. but I think we should refrain from adding any special emotional or sacredness to our international relationships. like pak considers its china relation. the other point is that it is also a cultural thing...

I am sure out diplomat may have paid that compliment, that doesnt mean that no collateral damages have happened. no matter, how 'disciplined' the army is, avoiding collateral damages when fighting enemy indulging in guirella warfare is unrealistic. you might want to believe the nationalistic...

@those who pride on muslim rule on india india was also ruled by british, portuguese and french but I have never heard evangelists calling it christian rule! so, how is the concept of muslim rule different? india was conquered by different nation belonging to different religions, but common...

good for you. thats the best way to prosper for all the nations in sub-continent.:enjoy:

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl: carry on, mate. give us a few more good ones. I am giving you a thanks for that. really funny. ps: maybe you should come to india and participate in indian laughter challenge. you will earn some good bucks

you completely failed to grasp my point. you seem to be hellbent on believing that india is the enemy, if it makes you happy, so be it.:hitwall: but the facts dont change, just because you close your eyes. consulates in afghanistan are just that consulates, if you have any other evidence then...

ha ha... man, akhand bharat is not same as mahabharat. and not many even know of the concept of akhand bharat, maybe you ppl need to get rid of your paranoia of being split. suffering from inferiority complex. btw, maybe the calendars were actually showing india as a part of pakistan. how...

this is the biggest worry of US and india. good article.:enjoy:

if you dont want to believe the facts, thats up to you. when taliban started losing in afghanistan, they ran away to pak. when US pressed PA to act against taliban, then pak started witnessing violence. as, the taliban started feeling the heat, suicide bombings started. right now, the situation...

then, why dont you?:rofl:

because before 2001 taliban had afghanistan where they could carry out their will and pakistan was gracious to allow them do that. but after 2001 US forced you to confront taliban, and when you did, you saw the backlash. anyway, if you were trying to prove that india is the enemy of pakistan...

well, said.:enjoy: