Search results

Exactly.. Hence no case. The SIT was formed to assess whether a case should be brought against Modi. Hence no need for acquittal. I agree. No one is a saint. All I am trying to avoid is unnecessary name calling. You will ding Modi, I will ding Jinnah. You will carry on. I will get banned.. etc...

My bad mate.. I meant Suzuki and not Toyota. Unless, you are willing to use your photoshop skills for faking pictures (what was that which Karan used to point out about a company in Bangalore being shown by you as a IT company in lahore ? ) and change the Suzuki Logo on a Mehran to a Toyota one...

If you are implying India, dont you think we would want the terrorists to try and attack your nuclear assets? What is more strategic for Pakistan than those? So come out of the mist of illogical nationalistic jingoism and open your self to alternate theories as well. What do terrorists want ...

Dude.. 1. Modi is not India's president. He is the Prime minister. 2. There was no case against Modi, hence no acquittal needed 3. The only thing he was blamed for was not acting fast enough against the rioters targeting muslims in Gujrat. That is far lighter than your Quid actually sending...

6 Ways to Improve Your English Writing Skills Using Cool Websites

What a coincidence. Back then, a Pakistani friend of mine evaluated and rejected both a Ferrari and a Jag. Bought a Toyota Mehran instead. :)

No doubt. Am embarrassed by the post you responded to. Please accept my apologies on his behalf..

RIP

wow :D

Actually another rumor is that India is planning to pay Nawaz Sharif 1 billion dollars in his swiss bank to scuttle the JF 17 program and F 16 upgrade program. With that out of the way, India can wait another 4-5 years for the MMRCA. Win Win... reverse arms race. Every one saves money :D

I fully agree. And that's what would have happened, had Jinnah not lost his nerve and tried to preempt the decision by sending in the tribal terrorists to capture Srinagar. It gave the Hindu Maharaja the valid reason to invite India. India was just waiting for an opportunity like this and jumped...

Wrong. Pakistan had an army, but the CinC refused to attack Kashmir post which Jinnah sent in the terrorists. Well, you guys gave the excuse to India to send in the forces when Maharaja of Kashmir appealed to India to save Kashmiri civilians from the Pakistan terrorists. Rest is history.

any link?

Only on the forum to take pot shots at Pakistan. The last thing India needs is more people :)

your reply is an example of how non sensical arguments have to resort to anecdotal claims and statements when challenged. Not worth responding to since none of the points has any backup statistics. Like, % Hindus in West Pakistan in 1947 vs now. And yes, go back a little bit more than your age...

Yes. Because your leader was too impatient and jittery Hyderabad was not contiguous with Pakistan. J&K was and was muslim dominated. And if India attacked, it would have been Pakistan who would have had the upper hand. But we will never find that out now. Will we ? True. Just like the trash...

Dealt with it. And due to that mistake of Jinnah and Liaqut Khan, India not only owns 2/3 of the J&K state (which was going to fall in the lap of Pakistan if Jinnah had some patience) but also controls the water supply to the whole of Pakistan

Any extremist is that. my friend.. any extremist

Well, Karan wont reply since he is in transit to USA, so let me try and answer. So help me understand this.. Pakistan attacks India because it wants to capture Kashmir, but doesnt have the guts to do that openly so sends 25000 of its troops in civilian grabs across the LOC to "liberate...

That explains it. Its not the ISI that is being targeted, but the minority Shia community. Business as usual. And I thought the Pakistani terrorists have grown a spine and are attacking ISI directly