You do not build weapons meant for war fighting for show... when you build them, you mean you want to fight.. They are not weapons of deterance. They are for you to fight. That should end all the discussion on any non objective criteria behind this situation.
The code has all of it. A simulation model does not work by omitting that. Also, do you have a background in computer science, if not, I ask you to sit it out...
Let me give you an example. CRAY XMP of 1980s had MAXIMUM 4 GB of RAM (for Cray 2 models) and a sustained (this is very important)...
Our of curiosity, may I humbly ask, what happened to you? I hope it is not COVID? Apologies if it is too personal.
If Pakistan cared so much for the lives it would not have gone on path of lowering the threshold of a nuclear war by building tactical nukes. I mean you cannot dance around fire...
Read the article properly, NOT just the headline like you people do :
The 2 billion figure is excess death over a period of time... As they say in long run we all are dead... there will be excess deaths over a long period of time.
Read the paper the article referencess ...
Its not just a question of what I am, its more, why do everyone and their grandmother have to bother what I am? Why so much fascination in origin of each of us? Just to insult each other? So you can go and search some random pictures on internet and post it and call it a win?
Errr... Lets repeat, shall we? You have 200 20KT bombs... there is a limit what you can do with it. Its that simple. BTW, when you fight conventional war with nukes to punch above your weight... you invite trouble....
If you bring a small pea-shooter in what was essentially a fist fight, will...
Thank you very much, I care less about Olympic gold and my personal achivement are enough for me. BTW, my little computer has processing power of many Cray XMPs from 80s and 90s, so I am good on that. Geez! You guys do not even know where present day computing stands!
Death is death, a dead soldier does not fight. A dead citizen produces no GDP. Rest is all details in bigger picture of nations. Personal level tragedies are plenty and humanity (especially south asian one) has lived through ages of them. Humanity.. will persist, everywhere. We have always.
When I said India will be badly badly hurt I also meant this as well, instead of having a life span of 60-70 years, it will fall in survivors to 30s or 40s. Its a reset back to 50s or 60s for Indian health care infra and progress. A painful existence but an existence none the less.
I never...
Actually, its more complicated than that. Those studies assumed burning of rubbles for months. It is useful to revist those assumptions. I mean, in Canada, lot of construction is based on wood on concrete base, which provides fuel for fire. Buildings really burn down here.
India has more...
Look, every time there is a debate, you see Pakistani folks go running like this : We will kill every Indian with our nukes, yeee-haaaw! So why not for once try to see if this is even feasible? I doubt that. And btw, I have ASSUMED that Pakistan has every damn advantage in this situation...
Well, I have always heard India Pakistan war will kill everyone in India from Pakistani but I have NEVER seen on shred of evidence to this. Care to show for that first? Care to show your estimates of what is the maximum number of deaths Pakistan is capable of causing in India? I doubt there is...
I am sick of people yapping about this weird "You are Indian" quip.. So, I shut down those who take that tangent and go off the main point. Apparently, ad-hominom was never taught to most of these creatures who do that. Best way is to insult them and set them on ignore. I typically also Google...