Search results

I think your view at best can be said to idiotic... there has been talks in chinese circle for decades that they need to teach India a final lesson... granted today's India's not 1962's India... but china too is not 1962's china... they have been building network across Tibetean plain for...

yea if we can save sumthing from this money eating politician ....

Why r we arguing about weather or not i have read the book which makes my question relevant or irrelavant. Why don't you answer those questions instaed. I just need to understand the reasons why??

No my question is relevant... it is not based on any book.... i would be all ears to any logical answers you may provide .....

The King Bharat ( prononunced as Bh - a - rat) was of Lunar Dynasty and is the first king ,to become digvijayi meaning one who has conquered one and all, after Lord Ram. He conquered the entire Indian sub continent of the time. India before him was refered to as Aryavarta . After him it was...

I do believe Chinese wouldn't have gone back without something in return.... Because if it were then Indian news channels would have reported... No body is talking ab out the deal... The million dollor question is what was the deal that was struck ???

India leaving means that the face off is no longer there... Chinese removed their five tents and we removed our twelve tents.... Chinese soldiers went back to their previous position and India soldiers returned to their base.... Indian soldiers have not left the place... they have just moved...

Yes, I have not read the book.... but i am going by comments posted by you and other bangladeshi bloggers.... You have not replied to the questions that i did raise....

And i believe you will achieve this by the help of Pakistan.... Strange that not 3 decades ago you were trying to get away from them and only India stood between you and continued slavery when on one side were Pakistan , China and USA. Let us hypothetically accept that what you are saying...

Should a war be fought ever again between our two countries, know this that we will make sure that the Chinese dragon will never be able to stand on its feet let alone breathe fire... These water bodies are not Chinese... do not try to eat more than you can stomach...

That is a very ridiculous proclamation on your part. When does Akshai Chin or indeed any part of Jammu & kashmir ever been part of china. Till 1950s even Tibet was not part of china. That is not your water.

It is true that India is not as advanced as china in terms of military parity but make no mistake sir that should a war be fought , we may have terrible casualty in India but we will also make sure that Chinese dragon will never able to stand on its feet let alone breathe fire.... Many in...

Your argument that India was not a singular entity is quite unfounded. You sir, would do well to remember the fact that some few hundred years ago ,USA too was a fractured state with lots of state fighting. Even europe was not in the same state as it is now, they too used to fight for supremacy...

I quite agree with your analysis.. though a point could be made for the BJP leader as he is not criticizing or trying to score points over pakistan... he has just commented ... don't take it other wise guys.... :)

With all due respect to you :-- Pakistan's history comprises of only the events leading to creation of pakistan and thereafter.... i.e Since 1940-till date , give or take few years before 1940... Indus valley civilization , Gandhar rajya(kingdom) , Puru Kingdom (porus was the king) etc...