Search results

^^^ it might be a joint Indo US effort and it's not a bad effort. US's first priority is to get India into some sort of cooperation and accountability mode wrt to nuclear proliferation which it has done with the complete support of Indian establishment they are hammering out workable deals. They...

Coa the lack of credibility of your system becomes irrelevant. It's not about whether AQ Khan can be trusted- that much they had already decided- it was also that your system won't be unbiased. So their observers could 'stamp' that it was ok or else raise the flag.

^^^ you know what I think siege... :P . It's all pre recorded stuff that's gonna be showcased as 'live'.

Oh hell no!! Last thing you can accuse India of hipocrisy. We have told you exactly what we believe in and what we practice- ladai jhagde chhod do aur economy focus karo---we live by it and that's what every Indian member has said. As your GDP grows, so will your defence budget.

Yaar kitne saal tak yehi rat lagayega. Waise that hi kitna ki batawara bada bada kiya jaye? Bhool gaye--agrez sab le gaye. Stop whining.

I would agree that he should not be 'handed over' because of the sensitive nature of his work and his volvement in your national security apparatus. But I think the questioning in the presence of, say, IAEA reprsentatives was not an unreasonable demand. The alleged crimes are of a grave nature.

Especially when YOU are the one hatching and planning the wars- 1965, 1971, 1948, they were the ones who started it. If they were so concerned about Bangali welfare, WHy didn't they postpone their agenda to focus upon their wellbeing first. Na, that's irrelevant.

Veracity. Credibility. The international community doesn't look at your system to be incapable of being influenced by extraneous factors, especially when a 'national hero' like AQ Khan is invovled.

We told you that democracy would work for you...you just have to have faith and stick with it :P

Lol!!!! KS doesn't leave a single opportunity without his eyes burning like 1000 watt lightbulbs when those three letters come together!!!

Of course the territory is disputed. You are occupying so much of our land illegally.

Irrelevant points. In 1980s, India made the horrendously dumb, ill advised and absurd decision to rig elections in Jammu & Kashmir. The consequences of that decision keeps burning us to this day- it sparked off a militancy that consumed the state. No matter how many quotas denial of legimitate...

It will fructify when I retire. Not one moment before that.

The priority was to keep west pakistan, the fountainhead of the state, protected. East pakistan was compromisable. What pintches is not the people decided to seceede but the land & resources & money that was lost.

And what reasons why we shouldn't report you for the same?

^^^ is this viraat refit or the IAC? Looks like it's near 'finished' state.

I know, the Sikhs, The Rajputs, The Maratha, The Madras Sappers (230 Yr old now) and Bengal (pretty much covers north, east, south & west) who've been walking all over your army and stomping them in every battle don't fight. That's why the british never 'hired' them-- they just formed hundred +...

^^^ pont- it's smaller than it's natural potential for a country of 180 M people

Technically it's some 10% of Pakistan's GDP (and 18% of Hewlett Packard's revenues, 1/3 rs of Tata's revenues).

Lol!! I've frequently felt mods think of themselves as dictators rather than policy managers. At least Taimi is ok wrt...there is this other mod with agnostic tendencies who keeps shutting down 1971 threads because it's a 'terrorist act' & what not. Sad to see that ppl are not interested in...