Search results

Perhaps but not enough to stopa deal.

They won't get anything close to that. The current Argentine govt isn't as rabidly anti military as previous govts. (For example the Kirchners) but they will be hard pushed to spend that kind of money when the economy is as bad as it. I am merely answering the questions being put. I have looked...

Would the max attack range perhaps be a range against a manoeuvring target? With the max range being simple kinematic straight line distance?

That would affect the range. The question is will the airlaunch compensate for the lack of booster?

They wouldn't be buying new airframes. they would be getting EDA and paying for Upgrade packs. roughly 24 million per aircraft. So that would be 480 million for 20 aircraft. leaving 180 million (Based on the 660 million dollar request) for weapons and ancillaries. The A4AR had a similar avionics...

The US fought really hard to head off the war and only backed the UK at the last minute when Argentina refused to back down. (The Junta was teetering on collapse and the war was the last opportunity for them to regain popularity through a military victory) The sale of aircraft to Argentina would...

Since the original specs state 8 metres I am guessing the initial booster has been removed for the air launched variant. and as can clearly be seen there are only two intakes instead of 4.

The fuel is available. Just not the drivers to delivery it. the situation was made worse by morons panic buying (Because they are morons) and emptying the pumps before they can get refilled.

MLU's will be able to use the AMRAAM (the aircraft were ex RNAF aircraft and were MLUd by them. ) The reason for Argentina to buy it would be this COST COST COST. The FAF will get Western jets and a vast boost to capability at a relatively low cost. It will not cause any foreign policy...

Here this may help your lack of knowledge

The Chileans requested the C7 AMRAAM in 2009 and were approved.

Interesting because the missile was allegedly 2000KG. (according to an old Janes article)

Collins Aerospace to upgrade U.S. Air Force F-15 fleet with ACES 5® ejection seats Collins Aerospace ACES 5 seat provides MIL-HDBK-516C safety while meeting Government requirements to include a qualification schedule planned within Air Force program objectives and equal or lower life cycle...

What was the maximum weight on those pylons again? i know it was discussed but can't remember where on here.

This is not "breaking news" It was plain "news" 5 days ago. And no I will not click on the likely terrible youtube video.

That would be an option if they had money. Also there are apparently 5 aircraft being reviewed according to the Argentine govt.

I know you have likely seen the footage of the Lockheed JSAAM palletised launcher, but that is the kind of luxury that the US can afford. Ordanance can be deleivered without slow lumbering transport planes in the relatively narrow Pakistani airspace.

Collins Aerospace do f16 ejection seats. They have a model for the F16. ASHM may be a requirement but cost will be more important. The US will likely provide EDA airframes. The Argentine airforce has traditionally flown western origin aircraft and will not switch easily. (Hence my previous...

Which country is that in? Because in the UK military personnel are subject to military and civil law. What you are describing sounds like an abuse of process. The kind that would likely be massively corrupt.

Probably both.