Search results

Of course, but we are .. the US! Okay hehehehe ...

So Chinese are not warmonger, nut neocon!? :rofl: Good! Two dogs are barking, biting each others for Uncle Sam's benefits hehehe .... 蚌鷸相持，漁翁得利 Don't be naive kiddo ... it is Vietnam's strategy "crying about its fictitious territorial claims everyday" to alarm the World's view on China's...

Yes, North VN's letter recognized the Chinese claims and China's September 4th, 1958 Declaration said: a) Triton island claimed by the PRC is not clear. b) South Vietnamese forces occupy Robert and Pattle islands (not yours [Chinese]) :D c) These islands excluded from any system by the PRC ...

Don't just say "Fact: ..." but provide the real facts etc ... not Xunzi's fabricated Facts! Please do show me the FACTs that Taiwan agree to "one country, two systems" ??? However, I do have RECENT fact about Taiwan's proposal that shot down by your Chinese Government though: Beijing Rejects...

ROC and PRC are no different. We are under a "One country, two systems" doctrine ... that is what you hope for though! "This system has also been proposed by the PRC government for Taiwan, but the Republic of China (ROC) government has refused this suggestion (it has also been claimed that the...

Next time, if you see that you can't rebuke my undeniable argument about Paracel islands NOT belong to China then nicely ask me to move on to the Spratly Islands' topic about Johnson Reef, Skirmish Reef that take place at Spratly Island Chain blah blah ... First of all, you don't have any logic...

Don't try to say WE here Xunzi since " we administered with military Garrison dating to 1945 " is not from the PRC but WE here is Chiang Kai-shek's governement and later withdrew from the Woody Island. They tried to rob but couldn't held on to it ... so it was never yours in the first place...

Apparently, you don't have a logical mind so no need for further humiliation ... Okay! However, you need to read your Chinese's September 4th, 1958 Declaration though: a) Triton island claimed by the PRC is not clear. b) South Vietnamese forces occupy Robert and Pattle islands (not yours...

Who are you kidding VietHome? :rofl: Did you not read: 1. Taken "Tet Offensive" for instance, was one of the largest military campaigns of the Vietnam War, launched on January 30, 1968 by forces of the Viet Cong and North Vietnamese Army against the forces of South Vietnam, the United States...

Yes, NiceGuy ... don't lie like that man! Yes, there was a political organization and army in South Vietnam and Cambodia that fought the United States and South Vietnamese governments during the Vietnam War called "Viet Cong" whom were trained and military supported from the North VN party...

Either you can't express your logic in English or you have problem with logical mind in general, Sunzi! :azn: Don't you get it, the parts with red border around them? Meaning China doesn't own those islands ... duh! :cheesy:

Which one of you Chinese boys speak the truth? :enjoy:

Don't be too sure on that, for friend vs. foe is a matter of national interest.

I don't think China will ever dare to go to war against the U.S. (period).

Don't know why China never learn from past history ... Troops of the Eight-Nation Alliance in 1900. Left to right: Britain, United States, Australia, British India, Germany, France, Austria-Hungary, Italy, Japan

1.was the letter from Vietnam EX-PM? --- Who's else ... :cheesy: 2.do the letter accept the statement China made in 1958? --- Yup! :-) 3.whether the statement in 1958 China made included claim on Xisha and Nansha islands? --- Yes!!! :yahoo:

First of all, if my friend already have seized the enemy's house backyard - then to have my acknowledgement or not is not matter, right!? However, this is not true in the case of PVD's acknowledgement to the Chinese's declaration in 1958. China had not seized any enemy's house backyard yet...

:D Do elaborate his post so that I can understand his logic hahahaha ....

Let's see ... :coffee: 1. Let say you have a house next to a neighbor's house. --- meaning that house BELONG to me! 2. You say that house belongs to your friend. --- false, because if that house belongs to my friend then how could you say: Let say I have a house? ---You should have stated...

You Vietnamese should not need to make any move at all, :) for the Pacific Hurricanes, Typhoons of 2014 will give them torrential move ...