Search results

Do you know why we helped organize the UNCLOS but not even have ratified and signed it? Because we :lol: want NO RESTRICTION due to that our military vessels and aircraft frequently exercise navigation or overflight in the area under US Freedom of Navigation Program. China have ratified and...

Battle of Bach Dang River probably wanted to say that luckily that oil rig is not in Vietnam's EEZ else another riot would kill 4 more Chinese ... I thought this is an English forum huh Hu Songshan?

Not for long ... :lol: North Korea Slams Xi Jinping and the Chinese Dream

bing bu yan zha 1.There can never be too much deception in war. 2.All's fair in war. 3.Nothing is too deceitful in war. :lol:

Of course, we are the USA ... We tell China what is or what's not and we clearly stated in that Declaration: Why didn't China protest it back then? Apparently, at that time your military is nothing comparing with the USA and European countries - putting a side of Japan's, until now you're...

First of all, you said "Han era fabrication" then later dynasties's books said Yuechang is now Vietnam but you still said that "later day additions cannot be proven" ... So, what is your point - either all of Chinese history is fabrication or you're just selected what you think it's right rather...

Some even said that recent anti Chinese riots in Vietnam was directed by Chinese's govt. as well.

Han era text and later other Chinese's dynasties pointed out that Yuechang is Vietnam nowadays and if you said China's history is nothing but fabrication then what is the point of debating this matter ... :lol: I think both PDF's Vietnamese and Chinese members are somewhat lying too ...

Fabrication is fabrication ... Lie is again, just lie ... Same thing with the FACT that China's ship chased and sank Vietnamese boat and yet BROADCASTING she did not etc ....

What is there to prove, the Empire of Great Qing's map did not include Paracel and Spratly archipelagos ???

Will do, for I have seen other member posted in Chinese too ...

So, are you saying Chinese history is all fabricated then!? :lol:

Dude, that was not what Xi Jinping said; he said: "No Gene for Invasion in Chinese People's Blood" instead!

Why not, since China is the aggressor in the SCS and has caused many conflicts in the region?

Could it be this? 南國山河南帝居 截然定分在天書 如何逆虜來侵犯 汝等行看取敗虛 The South nation resides the Southern Emperor This fate is written in the book of heaven If thou against it by invasion, As said, thou will be suffered a vanquishable destruction! Is this an "off-topic" example, huh Hu Songshan?

Xesy, either you can't read Vietnamese or have no logic in understanding a simple "recognized and agreed" phrase from your formal PM Pham Van Dong's letter. Accept the fact, but that is not the end of it, rather September 4th, 1958 Declaration of China still had no sovereignty over many islands...

As I said, "We are debating Yuechang at the moment and let resolve it first before getting carry away with 峰州 or 文郎" and you came to understand that "Even if Yuechang was located in modern day Vietnam" then you have to know Yuechang was Vietnam nowadays ... Agree!? We'll discuss of Van Lang...

No, really ... and yet you're acting like one! :rofl: So we are mistaken then .. hehehe ... :lol:

Can't predict that far out for the next 100 years but in the next 20 years we US still are the SUPER POWER :usflag:, not CHINA :rofl: