Search results

I doubt IAF can do that role with few LCAs. Besides an enemy would require an AC to attack us from through sea route. We have excellent relations with all countries operating a capable carrier. IAF's priority should be north and north-east for now or until they have a credible defensive...

I think they are just waiting for F-INSAS.:hitwall: New rifle, equipments, armor etc. Many lives will be lost in the meantime due to poor equipment.

There are some rumors but nothing concrete about F-35 replacing A-10s. F-35 cannot take the pounding that an A-10 can. And neither is it designed to perform the role of an A-10. F-35 or any other fighter aircraft are way too delicate for this job.

And a similar spec smartphone is nowhere to be found:cheers:. PC will rule for some more time to come. Smartphones may provide most of the features of a PC but most people would still prefer doing all those work on a PC than on a smartphone.

Lady.. go through the article before making your anti-India rants. No one is talking about India standing up to China or going to war with China. Credibility of author is also highly questionable. He reckons Chinese economy will collapse in a year. What a looser.

^^^ That would be an awesome addition. Hey I'm also a big fan of A-10.

Well.... Looks like Indian tri colours to me....

I hope you meant this legendary bird... P-51 Mustang

Buddy this is not a d*** measurement thread:hitwall:

Not possible when they are sitting on a pile of 12000 nukes. Dude.... even India won't join NATO... Forget about Russia.

You are right... We won't be getting any F-35s(if we ever order some) till 2025 at least. But the reasons provided by you are rubbish. USA is already providing us with top of the line platforms like P-8I and C-17. Now Russia or no other country has anything near as good as P-8s. If US was...

What he meant to say is Su-35BM/S being derived from Su-37 Terminator is a superior aircraft altogether. Not that Su-37 is superior. Su-35S is not a demonstrator. RuAF as already ordered some of them.

No, it cannot be used on any aircraft. It's a ground based radar. Swordfish is a derivative of Israeli EL/M-2080 Green Pine AESA radar.

Just curious to know about the different types available. As far as advantages of rotating AESA... I don't know. Maybe they can be more powerful as the antenna size can be much larger than that of a triangular configuration. DBC can answer that question.

Bro, are you sure that we are going to assign 3 frigates and 3 destroyers for each carrier? 2 destroyers and 2 frigates would be more correct. Are there any sources that mentions the use of 3 frigates and 3 destroyers? Thanks in advance.

I know about swashplate AESA.. Its not similar to a fully 360 degree rotating AESA radar for AWACS.

Thanks DBC.. Actually I meant to ask rotating AESA radar...

Irbis-E is a very powerful RADAR... Flanker Radars in Beyond Visual Range Air Combat

Ohh, my mistake... so are there any AWACS radome that rotates?

No. It's not derived from PAK-FA. It will be our F-35 equivalent(role) aircraft.