Search results

What peace talks? You want territory that we have & you expect us to discuss how we are going to give it ? Don't tell me you are that gullible. Peace can only happen around the status quo. Or some version slightly changed from it. Nothing more. Those who think India will give up territory, in...

If the Pakistanis want to discuss Kashmir, I see no reason why India has to agree to only discuss Indian administered Kashmir. That is Pakistan's position, the Indian position ought to be different.

That's an ICC tournament, nothing to do with the BCCI. Pissing off the ICC is hardly wise considering that PCB is surviving on ICC distributed revenues from the world cup. Nope. No chance. This isn't a BCCI decision, it has not been given permission from GoI. The BCCI chaps are not fools, they...

Nope but someone has to give company to Sir Zaid Hamid......:lol:

Pak-India talks hinge on terrorism caveat Baqir Sajjad Syed ISLAMABAD: The Pakistan-India agreement on resumption of dialogue on bilateral disputes may have provided an opening for a thaw in an otherwise frosty relationship, but an inbuilt caveat and the unspoken subtext could make progress...

I pointed out that the picture used was wrong but the story had basis because these aircrafts have some protection measures.

Yes, it is the plane used by senior ministers.

The only one wrong here is the guy who discounts the evidence provided by his own FIA, discounts the Pakistani government acknowledging that Ajmal Kasab was Pakistani (btw, that remains the position of the government of Pakistan, take your argument to them), the evidence provided by the...

The picture of the aircraft is wrong, the story is true even if made to look more glamorous than it is. This is the aircraft in question -

Or maybe there is something wrong with what you know. We don't really care one way or the other. Not that quantum of trade with CAR is ever going to be of any significant value. What we need to, we can from Iran.

He accused another Muslim (from the name) & they were seemingly the ones supporting a ban on beef. Stereotyping does not seem to be sensible here.

If they are those that involve India letting go of Kashmir, no dice. Not a price we will ever pay for your friendship. That's why the former FIA chief admitted that attack & why your government has now promised to expedite the case in court. You are free to believe what you want. Stop...

What solutions? Put it up here. Yup, things like 26/11 really help in creating an atmosphere of goodwill. Solution already exists. You want to change the status quo, the onus is on you to come up with one that will meet with Indian approval.

Assume that means India give up Kashmir. Nope. No interest. That's an asking price for "friendship" that will never get paid.

That's perfectly fine. No need to get all uppity about this then.

Your posts suggest anything but respect. In business, you win some & you lose some. What you do not do is to mock a potential customer. In this case, India has decided that it will go with the Japanese offer. Not the end of the story. There is a reason that the official stand of the Chinese...

Best time for it. This Government of India is about the most inclined to favour Japan than any other. In Japan, the government there is the most inclined to build up this relationship. No better time.

If you feel so strongly about it, feel free not to bid in India. No compulsions. We certainly don't need to offer our custom to those inclined to disrespect it.

There is no issue about playing in India except that once they do, it would be seen as churlish to refuse them a tour.

Err....Did put up the link Pakistan wanted foreign secretaries to talk on Kashmir on the fringes of NSA-level dialogue - Times of India