It is easy for China to send carrier to north atlantic, I dont see the reason why China can't while UK can :laugh: but to send carrier there need a sound reason; so amazing you speak like a 5 year old child :lol:
Explain what is the good reason for China to send CBG to there?
Wrong analogy.
You can't build chip even 130nm just because ASML give you a license to produce litography.
You need to master the foundry technology for 130nm to make such production and it is not as simple as assembly process in car manufacturing.
Your this kind of argument has been...
In what way China blink, or just bite off more than it can chew?
Actually this reef which shaped up into military base showed somebody has blinked, and obviously it was not China otherwise the reef will remain reef. :lol:
:laugh:
You are so dense. Nobody will sell their business/factory when the business prospect is still good.
Maybe 15 or 20 year when nobody want to use 130nm anymore, then the fabs will sell to you.
It used to be a rocket fuel.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_powder_rocket_motor
It is about technology independence also. That means China has arrived on technology independency for 28nm, while US may not.
Dont equate them; Intel doesnt belong to Vietnam, SIMC is China's indigenous fab.
LOL. None of what you are saying in line with fact nor logic :lol:
The fact is China economy performance is the best, so according to your logic China must be the smartest esp for building submarine for coastal patrol? :rofl:
Where did you get your education?
Yeah, what what was the purpose for PLAN to make patrol globally? it just wasted money and energy for nothing!. China should do better thing by focussing in west pacific and with her economic development.
This is like saying that current US space and military technology derived from Chinese ancient rocket and gunpowder technology.
West may have initiated the semiconductor production technology, but what china currently use with her latest 28nm is China's own IP/technology.
Know and belief/opinion is 2 different things; the latter is subjective and could be bias.
Russian expert believe/have opinion that their weapon is more advanced than Chinese.
The article just judge from the prejudice and suspicion.
You can't see the coding and algorithm, hence you can't know whether the 2 software is actually the same software. Judging from the skin could be misleading. LOL.
Su added the most significant improvement is the "turtleback" missile magazine, allowing the vessel to carry the Julang-3 submarine-launched ballistic missile — which has a range of about 12,000 km.
https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/4186427
Who debunked it? How come Huawei OS is an android?
Care to explain?
US can only make 7.5% (GlobalFoundries), so the gap between China and US is not far.
In the meantime for 28nm China is already independent, doesnt need foreign tech/equipment, while Glofo and Intel from US is still use...
2 mistakes from your statement:
1. China has her own operating system: Klyin, Hongmeng (OS Harmony), Alliyun
https://www.scmp.com/abacus/tech/article/3075656/meet-chinese-operating-system-thats-trying-shift-country-windows...