Search results

This... The Chinese military displayed “unusual prowess in their sophisticated launch strategy” which consisted of an intentionally complex three-wave attack meant to deceive and overcome the formidable defence systems of the US carrier group, the paper said. ...Means 'Chinese physics' were...

Sure, China can ban Micron out of 'national security' issues. But everyone knows it is a farcical reason because there is no technical basis for the action. If China want to ban Micron from selling in China, just say so.

Are you sure it was not about 'dumping' or selling below market value just to drive your competitor(s) out of business while your government support you?

As if you guys know WTF you are talking about this in the first place. :lol: If this does not go to court, it means China backed down. Whether China keep the ban or not, is not the point. Micron can simply say 'Sure' and laughs back to whatever the company was doing. But Micron would have no...

That is hilarious. Let? Micron is somehow preventing the Chinese government from presenting evidences OUTSIDE the legal and public realms? I have no idea the company is that powerful. More like the Chinese GOOBERMINT if Micron is that powerful.

Sure. Micron is more than willing to go to court, including the PUBLIC arena. :lol: For the benefits of interested readers out there...Policy cannot exists without TECHNICAL capabilities. Take designing a street, for example. Whether the street is one-way or two-way is a matter of policy. The...

Micron DRAM NAND products somehow are technically risky, but SMIC YMTC products that uses the same processeses somehow is not technically risky. This is another case of 'Chinese physics'.

So call the truth -- that Micron's shit is great stuff but we just want to retaliate. :lol: But China know better so the technical facade was erected -- national security risks. :crazy:

Look at it this way... Without me, all you guys would put on post after post of pseudo-technical mumbo-jumbo as to how China found those 'national security risks', and get away with them because most people simply do not know better. :enjoy:

Right now, every semicon engineer in the world, including China, are laughing behind closed doors at this decision and publication.

Anything can be interpreted to be 'interference' to at least put on a facade of victimhood to justify retaliation.

It means nothing. Now, before you start going off the handle, I suggest you use the forum's search feature on my comments about the semicon industry. I have explained to interested laymen more on the industry than any PDF Chinese have done and can do. Simply, I am working in the industry...

That is just sooo stupid. You are on a forum where everyone are bi-lingual, and some are multi-lingual, and where given the prominence of Spanish, you chose to challenge a Spanish speaker over a flawed internet utility. :rolleyes:

So without the Chinese market, Hollywood will go broke.

Actually, no. You should ask Russia why it took so long especially since Russia started it. But then, the question would be largely rhetorical because by now, we understand why. Poutine overestimated the Russian military, underestimated the Ukrainians, underestimated EU/NATO resolve...

One thing that the F-16 is at a minor disadvantage is with EW. Back in Desert Storm, we often intermittently blanketed the spectrum with noise. Between transmissions, we would allow the Iraqis to 'see' some airplanes such as the larger F-15, Tornados, and so on. The larger returns would force...

Personally, I would go centerline fuel for more weapons hardpoints for CAS. Of course, this would limit the combat range and loiter time as CAS usually desired. Illegitimate how? Serious question. If the issue is locations of those SAM sites, then the problem is %100 political, not technical...

Numerically speaking, Ukraine would need hundreds of fighter-bombers to make a difference, so from that perspective, 20-something F-16s would not make a dent considering at the onset of the war, the VKS outgunned the UkAF 1000-something to 100-something. On the other hand, the reason the VKS was...

So far, none of these keyboard generals ever got hired as war consultants. I wonder why...

You trusted a single source. You were incompetent. Comprehendo? :lol: