Search results

Also no offense to people here, and a bit off topic post, but when other ethno-linguistic groups are using the surname "Khan", it doesn't mean they are "wannabe pashtuns". Lol. Any way, chill out everyone.

And to put an end to this discussion, all of us Pakistanis are racist. There's no clear cut victim and oppressor here. The Pashtuns are racist against Punjabis and Urdu Speakers, the Baloch against Punjabis, the Sindhis against Pashtuns and Urdu speakers, the Urdu speakers against Punjabis and...

Come on, everyone here can tell what you really meant by "black faced". Denial wouldn't change the fact that your intention was racist, when you wrote such a word. PS: And I'm not judging. I am no one to judge. Colour based bigotry is very casual in Pakistan. Tell the ordinary person from my...

Mister or madame, by "black faced", you clearly implied and intended "dark skinned". Upper caste Punjabi themselves also discriminate against lower caste Punjabis by calling them black. The skin colour based bigotry is very casual in Pakistan. But since you mentioned black faced, there's no...

This author should be sent to say, Charsadda, for a year and he'll understand what racism is. When they'll call him coward, dhoti wearer, punjabi, joker, paan chewer, uncultured person farting in public, historic slave etc etc etc, only then will this piece of !@#$, attention seeker understand...

It's because they have mixed with the local Khattars to some extent, and also with their hindko speaking Tareen neighbours in Haripur. They are hindkowan in the true sense of the word, i'e Potohari/Pahari + Pashtun mix breeds. The Khattaks of Makhad on the other hand though, are purer and still...

Agreed. They don't form the majority in Chach(Hazro area) though, as a good number of people there are Potoharis, mostly of the Awan clan. The proper Pathan dominated area of Attock is the south-west of Jand, where the Khattak tribe resides, whose leader is known as the Khan of Makhad. And I...

Lol, they are at least 70% ethnic Potohari. The "Pathans" as they are called there are only found in the south-west and north. The speak Potohari and hindko.

Sanjay's 100% Pakistani. His mother is also Mohyal Brahmin from Pindi. The bearded guy is actually good looking, no homo. He's predominantly "caucasoid" with a dark skin. He would be considered exotic. Now the average Indian man on the other hand.... Let's just say, he wouldn't be...

Well Rajput is said to be a title rather than descent. Some huns and scythians assimilated into the local hindu culture and became rajputs over time, but I would consider their genetic contribution rather small. Some Potohari rajput clans have distant links to Rajasthan, like the feudal Jodhra...

I'm rather amused then offended. I mean that person mentioned Attock of all the places, where it's relatively common to find people as light as them, or even lighter. It's rather strange that the pot is calling the kettle black. And notice it's always the racists complaining about racism...

Those Mlechas are with whom you seek an association, hence you claiming almost white Nuristanis and kalaash to be hindus. Claiming them wouldn't make you any whiter. And it was central Ganga region which was always dominated by outsiders. Our homeland was a hinterland, with unruly and lawless...

Notice how he or she mentioned "black faces". They live in a delusion that they're some sort of white race, and get a reality check as soon as they go abroad.

There is no NA 107 in Jhelum, and there is no MNA named Abid Raza there. And also, there are no LEJ terrorists in Jhelum for the locals are ethnic Potohari and >90% sufi/barelvi according to my estimates. Kam chars piya karo bhai.

You are self hating bhindian, always seeking association with foreigners just like the rest of your kind.

I feel Lahoris tend to be very nationalistic and xenophobic, things which aren't common in the rest of Punjab. And of course they are finding soft targets now.

Read your own citation. The god was called "Imro". Nuristanis and Kalaash have nothing to do with hinduism. The are thought to follow an indo-iranian pagan religion. What's next? Ancient Persians were also hindus?

Lol @ "ancient form of hinduism". Even the account clearly describe them as shamanistic, following some form of indo-european religion. They probably followed the same religion as Kalaash, who are definitely not bhagvad gita reading, Ganga bathing hindus. Someone was right here; these Indians...

And this study is a joke. Historians throughout the world do not believe Indian archaeology, which is usually inspired by myths and stuff. Renaming Ghaggar Hakra as Saraswati is also not accepted by the international archaeological community. Saraswati's identity is mythical, and candidates also...

Nuristani weren't following "hinduism" and singing om jay jagdish in front of a statue. They were most likely nature worshippers like the modern day Kalaash people of Pakistan are. Lol, another Indian trying to link himself to light skinned foreigners. Indians linking themselves with foreigners...