Search results

Go back and read your own post it says small group of democrats........not all.....and there is always going to be a pakistani lobby + non proliferation lobby working against this deal.....but still it is a small group...resistence to deal is always expected.....

Go back and check my post I never said that........My post was in response to your bhavishyawani that this relation is shortlived............. and as far as this deal is concerned IT is all about muchual interest.......

not so fast ...and dont worry he wont be there to see anything like that......:P

probabaly after divorce with mush ...;)

:D:D You guys really hate him? dont you. I cant belive that he gave a statement like this...He is a demoraliser...

oh... yea......and why is that??? please explain to us .........:bounce: hey wait a minute.... are you comparing this with pakistan US relationship????:P

self deleted

self deleted

http://thenews.com.pk/top_story_detail.asp?Id=17216 Saturday, September 13, 2008 Says US attacks can be taken up at diplomatic level By Asim Yasin ISLAMABAD: Prime Minister Syed Yousuf Raza Gilani on Friday pledged to raise the issue of US threats to Pakistan's territorial integrity...

China mum on possible nuke deal with Pak Amid reports that Pakistan may ink a nuclear deal with China next week during President Asif Ali Zardari's maiden visit in Beijing, China on Thursday kept mum on the issue but said all countries were entitled to make peaceful use of atomic energy...

May be he is here to do some bussiness: CONCLUDED/ON-GOING CONTRACTS WITH ISRAEL MEDIUM-RANGE SURFACE TO AIR MISSILE (DRDO/ARMY/NAVY/IAF) PHALCON AWACS (IAF) BARAK MISSILE SYSTEM (NAVY) BARAK-2 MISSILE SYSTEM SPYDER LLQRM SYSTEM (IAF) GREENPINE LLT AND BM TRACKING RADAR (ARMY/IAF)...

well what you have said is easier said than done...........

Gpit..... Everything you have said is absolutely right ......US-NATO weapon sharing is a clear violation of the NPT............but not accourding to US .... US pressents the argument that all the weapons are under complete controll of the US govt and forces.......during the peace...

what do you mean by this???

thats good News. is this system defferent from IRNSS or both are same???

NPT is different for recognised N wepon state and for non N wepon state..Dont try to see India and pakistan through the glass of N5....India is not willing to sign it because.....India belive that it is discreminatory to the member states.....the rules for every country must be same .......

Read the NPT text carefully........ 1) what you are saying is only applicable to NPT recognised N wepon state.........not to India and Pakistan .... 2) I was refering this in the context of the gpit's argument....that after signing the NPT, pakistan can develope or improve the N devise..wht...

1) These two statements in Red are contradictary two each other : any country who is signetury to NPT can not develope nuclear devise Official text of NPT with back ground NPT: background Quote from the text of NPT Article I Each nuclear-weapon State Party to the Treaty undertakes not...

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

Well I already said in my earlier post to muse that both you and me will never going to agree with each other in this type of topics.....both side will have a never ending and flaming arguments to pressent for this topic so better to leave it on Indian court. so with that I am signing off as...