What's new

Search results

  1. his5850

    J-10 might not needed as they don't add anything to PAF's capability

    when PAF said they don't like china's planes what people don't understand it is not just about 8 planes it is also about 78 other planes these numbers are not easily replaceable 1)let us replace mirages and F-7 and F7P then we think about replacing F-16 2)we have 200+ aging planes and you are...
  2. his5850

    For Paf: How To Invest The $270 Million Saved From The F16 Purchase

    what u are talking about is Max. takeoff weight but i was taking about payload here is why there is a difference J10A is heavy plane it's Max. takeoff weight is 19000KG but payload is only 6000 but on other hand F-16 also have Max. takeoff weight of 19000KG but payload of 8000KG because F-16 is...
  3. his5850

    For Paf: How To Invest The $270 Million Saved From The F16 Purchase

    i don't thing people is understanding what they are talking about F-16 is not just 8 planes it is a hole fleet of planes 74 of them that is not a easy number to replace or you have to be stupid like Indians more of it later 1) I think most probable would be if F-16 deal from US will not break...
  4. his5850

    J-10 might not needed as they don't add anything to PAF's capability

    when we talk about J-10 we have to remember that J-10 is also a light weight fighter Just like JF-17 it is bigger because of that it can carry more flue for long rang fight that is the one of the reason china selected J10 and J10 A can carry 6,000 kg and JF-17 block II can carry 4500 Kg of...
  5. his5850

    Pakistan may study other fighter options as US asks Pakistan to make full payment for F-16 purchase

    U have to remember that there are more then one reason that pakistan want acquire F-16 1)Pakistan have lot of old planes like F-7's they have to be replace very soon 2)JF-17 are being produce but they cannot fill the gap in time 3)JF-17 block 1 and 2 are comparable to F-16A block 3 will to...
  6. his5850

    Pakistan may study other fighter options as US asks Pakistan to make full payment for F-16 purchase

    J-10 is also a light weight fighter Just like JF-17 it is bigger because of that it can carry more flue for long rang fight that is the one of the reason china selected J10 and J10 A can carry 6,000 kg and JF-17 block II can carry 5500 Kg of Useful load if J-10B is in medium class fighter just...
  7. his5850

    Pakistan may study other fighter options as US asks Pakistan to make full payment for F-16 purchase

    JF-17 can replace F-16 but after one year with JF-17 block III pakistan need planes with presentation guiding on a very difficult terrain with Targeting Pods which JF-17 does not have right now but it will
  8. his5850

    JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 6]

    Look's like SU-35 or J-10 deal still on the table Pakistan is all set buy another ten F-16 fighter planes from Washington after a move to block sale of eight F-16 jets to Pakistan was rejected by the US Senate. “Pakistan has bought eight F-16 planes, two single seat F-16Cs and six twin-seat...
  9. his5850

    JF-17's ECM & Design Limitations

    This is every thing to do with AESA system because you are taking about SU-30 which use PESA system that show you have no idea what the hell are you taking This is simple AESA vs PESA US and every western country is using AESA System which can effect by simple virus and can be jam by few...
  10. his5850

    JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 6]

    JH7 or JH7B are good but they are like SU-34 it is a fighter bomber it is primary objective is ground bombing secondary objective is fighting if PAF need fighter bomber that is a good option but for air superiority mode if PAF need a heavy fighter J-11 which pointed by tank131 Russia would not...
  11. his5850

    JF-17's ECM & Design Limitations

    you talking about future plans when su-30 will have new radar JF-17 will have AESA radar when you haven even better then old we also do the same and you no idea how radar work how detection of the plane happens you are making up stuff out of thin air and MKI could detect the Mirage-2000 from...
  12. his5850

    JF-17's ECM & Design Limitations

    Man you have no idea what are u talking about if i can see a Target 5 miles away from a scope of the gun can i kill it no Bars R also to see very small target from long range max range is 400KM is plane come in radar detection and get detected that isn't how it work 2nd RCS of SU-30 MKi is 10m2...
  13. his5850

    JF-17's ECM & Design Limitations

    If u really think that pakistani air force is that weak and and cannot fight and Indian air force can beat every one in the world then why are wasting your time here if u think that Indian air force technology far better then good for you if you think MIG 21 is better or same as F-15 then i...
  14. his5850

    JF-17's ECM & Design Limitations

    May be you should read some history F-4 Phantom was created as 3rd generation fighter because of it's heavy weight it could not it was turn into a bomber then comes the F-4 Phantom II which fixed some of it's problems but it was still wasn't a dog fighter so US worked on 4th generation F-16 and...
  15. his5850

    JF-17's ECM & Design Limitations

    please share the source of that JF-17 using KLJ-7V2 multi-mode, pulse-Doppler radar it has same kind as Tejas EL/M-2032 multi-mode, pulse-Doppler radar if u think it is useless then why are u using it in your own planes
  16. his5850

    JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 6]

    MastanKhan you have no idea what are you talking about US did not even build that many 3rd generation of fighters they directly jumped to 4th generation of fighter if they can do that why don't we and please explain how and why The 5th gen fighter do not fill int the hole for a 4 / 4.5 gen...
  17. his5850

    JF-17's ECM & Design Limitations

    yes PAF need a heavy fighter there only few options for pakistan buy euro fighter but it is too expensive OK let see a another one SU-35 which India would not let us buy it how about Chinese J-11 or J-15 still expensive but let's say we gave the order of 40 planes and when we going to get India...
  18. his5850

    JF-17's ECM & Design Limitations

    MKI can also can be seen from far away because of it's size and you having too many options is good thing it going to make your air force useless because u have to maintain too many platforms which u also not making fully inside your own country if u think having too many options are good thing...
  19. his5850

    JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 6]

    we do not have TOT for RD93 and F-16 like F-16 we do not to suffer that same problem it was very difficult for pakistan to maintain F-16 in section time and it is difficult for Russia to block the sale of RD-93 because Russian selling it to china not to pakistan even if Russia block it what u...
  20. his5850

    JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 6]

    What u say is all well and good but problem is Is it section proof the single benefit of RD-93 is we buy this engine from china not from Russia so it has china's protection on it EJ200 is good but unless we can get this engine in transfer of technology arrangement this will be useless to us
Back
Top Bottom