Search results

Forgot to add these: http://www.navsource.org/archives/02/67.htm https://www.history.navy.mil/research/histories/ship-histories/danfs/j/john-f-kennedy-cva-67.html I don’t know why a conventional carrier with a displacement of more than 80k is not possible. But since there are doubts, I’d like...

Claim about the following content: I mean NO quarrel. I am NOT attempting to convince anyone. I’m fine with any other share their thoughts. I will mark this post so when the launch day comes it will be clear enough for everybody to tell whether it’s right or wrong. Until then, don’t being...

Yes thx my friend, for your thoughts. I just wanna add a few words. C-Dome is surely very efficient against rockets and drones. They are designed for them. But when it comes to stuff like anti ship missile with strong penetration abilities, or even aircraft that maneuvers, it will have...

It’s totally fine u keep it that way. Like those people claiming Su-35 will never be bought, FC-31 will never be introduced. You can continue your own war anywhere anytime, since u said I want to put rules on u. So plz, go on. Bye, hope you are still around when 003 is launched.

You want to make “speculation” on a futuristic thing. Okay, in time we will find out. But now seems like you are so crazy about denying everything that is against your opinions EVEN if it’s fact. One denying after another. Keep this in mind, your source is NOT the absolute truth. Be open-minded...

That is a point. It likely to happen. But there is possibility that in that source the unit “ton” does mean 1000 kilograms. Because it was not clearly defined.

These old granny are simply way tooooooooooooo outdated. They really need to go to the museum or get demolished.

Indeed some equipments on SAAR6 is better than 054AP. But I don’t agree that it is totally better armed than 054AP. 054AP has better anti-ship fire, better anti-sub warfare capabilities, better endurance, better SAM missile.

I agree. I have no interest on talking about 003 anymore. I will stick with things that have already happened. It will make the conversation easier at least.

Ah, see, this is where u MADE THINGS UP. On that site, there is NO single piece saying it’s short tons. It said tons. You are wasting time here come on. Secondly, I can see that u really lack some understanding of the things u r talking about. It is well-known that JFK as a Kitty Hawk class...

1, ture. No more steam turbine engine DDG will ever be built for PLAN. BUT like I said, those ships I mentioned are NOT outdated. 2. You really don’t understand what I say, yes? I will keep repeat what I say till u understand. I said there are conventional carrier more than 80k tons, such as...

So what about JFK and USS America? And also, a whole bunch of other reliable source show that the displacement of USS Constellation is not the one u quote. So I will say maybe, just maybe not the whole class is more than 80k. But JFK is surely one.

The fact I was talking about is: 1, Those 956, 051B, 051C are quite useful. One 956E was upgraded recently, and there is another one under modification. 051B was also upgraded couple years back. So calling these ships “outdated” is wrong. What is a outdated ship like for PLAN? Ships like those...

Certainly there is no point to argue with your nonsense since u have even denied facts already. I do have some speculations, but I prefer to hit u with the ship itself when she sails. Oh, and don’t you worry, I got your word screenshotted. WE WILL WAIT AND SEE.

Speculation doesn’t equal to non-sense.

In time, everything will be known, every detail. So I won’t say a single word about this future thing. And I do suggest u do the same. No gossip worth listening.

It will be a bit smaller than Kitty Hawk. And, don’t trust ANYONE when it comes to this topic, including me. In time u will know the true answer.

兄弟啊，要丢人现眼可以，别来这里行不行？所有的图我都截好了，以后用事实来戳破你的这个国际笑话吧。就像之前那些说买苏35就剁吊的人一样。

credible information is something always hard to obtain. Doesn’t matter what kind of missile it is. Should u have questions about the details of YJ-12, I will see what I can give u.

Yes, both, partially. HQ-16A uses AESA radar and some other differences. I’m trying to say there should be no problem for Chinese Army and Navy to use the upgraded missiles. And yes, mixed, first subsonic then 3 Mach sprint. But if we narrow it down, among all the anti ship cruise missile that...