Search results

There is always that glorious third option: proxy war! :cheesy:

Ah, allright.

Why wouldn't India just buy it?

I understand you reasoning and a agree with that. But you can also ask if ISIS would exist if Hussein would not be disposed. ISIS grew in Iraq first. Terrorism goes way further than that, it is the ideology that picks up weapons to kill innocent people, not Usa, Russia,... Out of respect, I...

People are running away from the civil war in general, however, there was an influx when ISIS rose. (2014-2015) With scum I just ment all the evil in Syria, Assad, ISIS, Al-Nursa,...

Well, actually, most terror attackers are people who lived their entire lives in those western countries, they failed to assimilate, took drugs, went to a salafist mosque for 2 months and blamed their problems on the western governments. Syrians are running from the same scumbags commiting...

Pretty much how Trumps campaign went.

Instead of killing your enemy yourself, you can instead send a hot chick to fvck someone else into doing it for you. :azn: Lesson learned.:sarcastic:

I never tried to spam, you can check the thread, never was my intention. I admit that the debate was off topic (still about Syria). You calling me a 'shill' is uncalled for. I will not comment anymore, as it seems you are very offended and I don't want to cause you a heartache. Have a nice day...

I am not the one accusing Russia of supporting ISIS, but I shall stop the debate.

The 'rebels' were not only fighting ISIS, they were fighting Assad too. Those bombs were never meant to 'help' ISIS. The only thing you have proven is that Russia happened to bomb at the same time ISIS was fighting the rebels and Assad, Russia in this case was aiding Assad against the rebels...

Haven't found proof of that. Russia supporting ISIS is bullsh1t. If you feel better, keep telling yourself that. :disagree::blah: Assad indeed focused more on the rebels, because they were a bigger threat the rebels focused more on Assad than on ISIS. I am afraid you're the one who has to give...

I understand your reasoning, but I still feel sorry for them.

It is very stupid, but they still didn't deserve to be burned to death. You will be surprised how greedy people can be in west.

I haven't been able to find any proof that Russia supported ISIS in Marea, they were aiding Assad (and even the Kurds) in taking several towns, the Russians also have delivered air support for the Turks against ISIS. Since 2015 Russian have been fighting ISIS. So it is safe to say that Russia...

Lol, Isis had a big presence in Aleppo, not anymore and that's not thanks to the 'moderate' FSA (in reality led by Al-Nursa and other Salafists). Assad is a bastard, but the FSA is not a hair better. I really recommend you watch these videos: Yeah, sure. Israel has been paying, supporting and...

RIP. To die is one thing, but to burn to death is even worse. Perhaps they did it out of despair? like @KediKesenFare pointed out?

The Baltics joined NATO in 1997, hence why I said 'the good spirits' were broken (and Gorbachevseems to agree), Usa was planning to install missile shields under Bush, before Russia has been doing much. NATO has been creeping up to Russian border and you expect the Russians to just sit there...

I agree that ISIS might not always have been the main focus of the Russians, but they did fight them (Palmyra, Aleppo,...) Russia also has been heavily fighting Al-Nursa (Al-Qaeda). To say that they weren't always focusing on ISIS is one thing, but to say that they haven't been fighting ISIS (or...

I don't understand. If the economies of those grow, wouldn't it be beneficial for Europe/west too?