Search results

Bash it.:lol: Take a good look at the title here. RAW in Pakistan planning new attacks: Manmohan The implication is that RAW has people in Pakistan and [sic RAW] is planning new attacks on India. This is NOT what the article says. My objection is the loose manner of providing such...

Provide Info on Fresh Terror Threat: Pak to India REZAUL H LASKAR/ISLAMABAD | AUG 18, 2009 Pakistan today said it cannot take "lightly" Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's remarks about terror groups based in this country planning fresh attacks on India and is awaiting New Delhi's response to...

LiberalPakistani: You are very liberal with your title I hope you got it right. ALSO I would also strongly suggest you have the manners to provide a reliable link to your story. I somehow doubt it has the heading you have provided. Kindly NOTE neither RAW or ISI are mention in that...

As a comment Not necessary.

Well children I see you have all resorted to the usual rants and raves and really accomplishing little about the real topic. Not bad for a bunch of educated your people. I have not seen yet how this brings instability to the region any more than the various pieces of military hardware India...

I realise we may slightly go off track here but your comments do need a little rectifying. Possibly within the confines of the Pakistan military there is a hiatus re publications. This is in reality a self inflected wound. Publishing in any reputable magazine or journal is a basis for getting...

This only works if you carry a level of personal credibility, that is how you stand within that field and your association. This is something which few here carry to make such opeds. This is why I said the Air Commodore's piece may carry some weight. But it is easy to brush it off from their...

Air Commodore (Retired)Tariq Mahmud Ashraf’s reply may be useful if it was to be published in the CTC Sentinel. Note I said may. Being published in the Pakistan Daily, or for that matter here, has little or no significance but for local consumption. The job is finished for now. Let it sit...

Prof Gregory like many in academia and hold “expert” status will always have something to say be it via interviews or an occasional Op-Ed. In all cases this tends to lead to a level of bias or a better term is skewness in the end result presented in the media. That skew may be generated by...

still more: In the first post under Equipment in Service Armour with the numbers of equipment provided how old are these. The numbers on the Wikipedia site link: Pakistan Army - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia are higher. Is this just a clash of numbers between Janes and Wikipedia...

In the original article it gives the following for Equipment in Service, Armour: Does this cover the following: Maaz, Mouz, Talha, Saad, Al-Hamza, Al-Qaswa, Sakb and Al-Hadeed as well as any remaing M113A1/2s or only deal with the various specific APC types?

As one stated by one Man Remove the plank from your eye first before removing the splinter from your brothers eye. Worth think about before throwing out too much condemnation here.

At least they start that way :D

on a point of clarification was the prof referring to the weapons or to the collective nuclear infrastructure. This was the impression I got from the CTC Sentinel article.

Simple my second point was just a basic reminder that this sub forum is still totally public and hence a need to hold ones excitement down a bit, ie talk with limits. It may be better if this sub forum was a little more private. See PM anyway

a couple of things: 1. It might be a good move with respect to the conversation to wait for 'The Gregory' reply. I would not hold ones breath for a sane answer. Does he know the complete correspondence exchange will be on a public forum? 2. There has been much discussion on what is and...

It is getting a bit pathetic that people here just are not able to read threads. This topic has been raised twice already. DO we need a third thread on the same issue? Here: http://www.defence.pk/forums/strategic-geopolitical-issues/31462-jihadis-thrice-attacked-pakistan-nuclear-sites.html...

Seems to me to be a legitimate web site and is another military based site. ref : ALIDE :: Base Militar Web Magazine But it is totally useless to most unless you can read Portuguese.:lol: Has some interesting posts/articles. but for depth of study and Brazil this is far more...

Your logic seems to slide somewhere as I don't follow it at all. It is a poor assumption that an IFV will travel at a tank speed while an APC/IMV/ICV will be slower. What you should consider here is the type, wheel or track. That has more of a relation of maintaining contact with the tanks...

I was anticipating a little more in an article titled Enemy of the state. But there would be at lease one other matter that should have been included, apathy. Apathy of the governments, national and provincial as well as apathy of the people. These things require backing and manpower...