Search results

https://www.saab.com/products/gripen-e-series MTOW of Gripen E is same

Use case of such simulation which don't consider such variables? War preparedness is a major factor, otherwise, Indo-Pak would have broken out in 2001.

This is all good , but Indian armed forces not going to go for any conflict, atleast for next 10 years. The reduction in forces (to 6-8 lakh, tour of duty reforms), and to create new war plans, doctrines and purchases going to take atleast 10 years . And if theaterization happen, which is...

There were system integration problems, indeed. But I don't know that anyone ever said, even CAG about QA/QC for Tejas. More so they going for 6000 and 10000 hours of stress tests for certifying the airframe, if there is such problems, they won't be going for such stress tests. I never heard...

Structural load test for certifying 6000 and 10000 hours of airframe life. Initial certification for 6000 hours be cleared within 1 1/2 years- 2 years, by increasing load limit by a factor of 3. Full certification for 10000 hours take 8-10 years.

Yeah you are right. Indeed, I am pretty sure they updated warplanes after that. They weren’t just expecting that PAF only target LoC but actually Sri Nagar. But they were indeed wrong. Expect BARCAPs inside Pak territory next time.

Amazing because MKIs never emitted anything or turned on there radars. Because as we know Tarang RWR is not deeply integrated with Bars, and you have to turn off radar for using RWR. That’s is the shortcoming PAF realised in 2019? That is written in CAG report. They must start reading these...

Indeed like all here are of DG ISPR.

There were ample data available about Yankhot from Ukraine , and if Pak have to rely on this, then there is serious problem with intelligence in Pak. And with almost 100% confidence I can , the flight profile the Pakistan showing is not true. And it is not launched from Sirsa, there is no...

I am surprised, that people claiming it to be BrahMos, while DG ISPR unable to show any indian markings. Very suprising.

Who said this? ADA Never said Mk1 not going to have weapon bay.

This is actual fabrication for first PV.

https://alphadefense.in/eots-of-amca-to-begin-flight-testing/ EOTS for AMCA from IRDE

No, but might be you can? Not worth to reply, might be you should check new designs coming out from Europe and US.

The BrahMos TESTED range in most likelihood is 700 km, as the NOTAM was around 800 km for the test. And we always going to see 2 VLS systems in Indian navy ships, one for AShM/SSM other for AAD. Now even US and Europe shifting toward such arrangements, I don't think we going to drop this. NGF...

The latest test confirms the BrahMos range of 700 km. But I don't think SSM version of BrahMos will be on P-15 A/B or in P-17A (right now she might have 300 km BrahMos SSM). The role of these ships is entirely different than what you trying to portray. while NGMV fits that role what you are...

When the commissioning of SSNs starts, IN totally leaves the concept of stand-alone deployments, rather than CBGs and strike groups. For standalone deployments, for establishing blockade, most likely IN keep giving orders of NGMV. PDMS They most likely waiting for this to complete...

Mutually beneficial you mean, ceasing control over the valley? Never going to happen, there is no incentive for anyone to do it. The war economy is so much normalised, that not only locals are involved in it, but also security forces got a pie in it. The simple solution is , implement Police...

I don’t know where is the lead. When whole IA totally focused toward vertical envelopment. But that is for the Pakistanis to analyse.

This is totally untrue, I would trust the Dassault press release more. https://www.dassault-aviation.com/en/group/press/press-kits/indonesia-purchases-the-rafale/ Also, it means that Indonesia said bye-bye to KFX. Otherwise, Operating two 4.5 gen MRCA be a logistical nightmare.