Search results

You guys need to read the verdict before posting rubbish "It is hereby declared that having failed to disclose his un-withdrawn receivables constituting assets from Capital FZE Jebel Ali, UAE in his nomination papers filed for the General Elections held in 2013 in terms of Section 12(2)(f) of...

@expert Judges are not infallible and can make error in interpreting laws or constitutions and there could be procedure errors. You had 5 judges bench and two judges disqualified nawaz before even Ikama was introduced or JIT was formed. They did not even monitor JIT or hearings but still joined...

He is actually right if we look at charges against him and what actually became the reason of his disqualification at the end i.e no receiving suppose 10,000 dirhams income from his son company as he just became chairman to get ikama..started with panama and ended at ikama Proud...

There were few point mentioned if you watched the entire clip 1) This case was highly politicise and Judges had no option but to disqualify Nawaz 2) It was like digging mountain and finding dead rats. All those corruption in billions, offshore companies and money laundering charges were never...

Decision of supreme court is public property so its debatable topic and here is opinions of legal experts which is more logical than trolling and personal opinion of emotional supporters watch these videos of legal experts before commenting on this verdict

They are waiting 4 witness from England and they should be good Muslims whose testimony cannot be deny :D

good and I hope you wish it apply to every politician rather than just one case... laws should not be politicise and it should not be apply on selective people

I was actually talking about disqualification under article 62 and 63 and it should be applied on all politicians rather than just one politician. Nawaz sharif did not disqualified because of corruption charges any way. He was disqualified because he was not sadiq and ameen. Politicians have to...

You don't see the irony perhaps If I say article 62 and 63 is ridiculous to be implement on anyone and next day I start celebrating sweets because my opponents become disqualify under same article which I have been opposing then I will become laughing stock and deserve the title of big hypocrite

did you even read my question in bold?

Why don't apply same logic to others? they are all innocent until proven guilty or corrupt by court ..no? but here we love throwing blind accusations of corruption and even give figure in billions Even let leave this zina thing. I personally don't care a bit about how many girls he been...

Its not about my rights. Its about whether a politician and public position holders satisfy the requirements of article 62 or 63 as set in our constitutions. Rule should be same for everyone. If you celebrate the disqualification of others based on article 62 and 63 then you should have moral...

People dont commit zina on street in front of public to record it or witness it. My point was that act of Zina or accusation of sita can be proven/verify with DNA test and it can also be debated whethet it was with mutual consent or she forced imran into it lol Imran is known as playboy in his...

You are just embarssing yourself in attempt of defending the zina of IK. Mother is saying its child of Imran khan. Imran khan is denying to comment on it . We all know he was playboy in the past with multiple affairs. You are looking four witness to prove that he is the father of illegtimate...

If this act was not by mutual consent then sita would have ra ped imran khaan lol You are really jahil talib who still living in 7th century as if Islam oppose using all modren technology and advancement for courts and trial. Come out of your cave and embrace modern world please

Wrong. Evidence were required when you had no DNA technology available. So if DNA prove that you were involved in act then no need to look 4 witnesses Imran is hesitant to deny it prove it all Its hilarious how they are defending him when he has no courage to deny it because he know the truth

I am ready for it but imran khan dont deny it and hesitant to answer this question .Go watch video posted in previous page

You are so dumb. Islam is not against using DNA technology to prove the crimes of zina or rape etc..by the way look at this which is evidence in itself

It could easily be verified with DNA test. You are not living in 7th century and also illegitamte child is evidence

Go read article 62 and 63 of constitution first http://www.article6263.com/save-pakistan/text-from-the-constitution-article-62-63/ I will say only God know who is sadiq and ameen then why judge has to disqualify people under article 62