Search results

No but you can abstract from what has been posted no matter how concrete it appeared to be. I could speak about many specific pigeons with yellow tails, but I'm still talking about birds in general. Because you should do your own research if you were that interested in it, otherwise it comes...

Of course it's adequate. It's only inadequate if you're stupid and have a low thinking ability. What you need to do is to deconstruct what has been posted. If you want to look at it in your concrete way, there are further examples which support this paradigm, which include Libya v UK, (1992)...

I'm not evading it: linear examples cannot be applied onto nonlinear paradigms. How many times must this be repeated to you in order for it to sink in? I have even bolded and underlined it! Are you selectively reading? You keep saying I am evading, yet I have explained this yet again in this...

1.Yes, I have already explained enough times that linear reasoning cannot be applied to nonlinear paradigms. Your requests are fruitless and logically kaput. I have not evaded anything, I have fully explained it so many times, and yet you simply don't get it. 2. You're still lying, and also...

1. You are constantly lying that I am evading when I already explained it. Go back and read it. 2. The only thing I am refusing to do is to repeat / repost something I've gone through many, many times. The posts are still there, you can go back and read it. There is no point repeating something...

1. Because you are constantly lying that I am evading when I already explained it. 2. There's no point quoting / responding to something that I've already explained a billion times. Basically, you didn't understand what I post, so you make lies that I evaded something. Then you go on to produce...

No I just can't be bothered to give you my time. I have explained more than enough times, but you just keep floundering and confusing yourself. I realised nearly all of your responses are just you getting frustrated because you don't understand what I posted. I'm not sure how to word this...

Oh? So we stopped the "case opened" and "case closed" thing. Based on intuition, I KNEW you'd respond like some crazy, controlling, self entitled arbiter. Arguing over petty semantics red herring. And no you're not even thinking it through properly. No matter what petty nitpicking word you...

First of all, your "case opened" and "case closed" phrases clearly don't mean anything, because I know you will continue to respond to me. So you can't even abide by your own rules that you make, which to me is actually hilarious given the topic of discussion and given that you were previously...

I don't understand why that required repetition five times but okay

Why are you acting like you are correct, when you're not? No matter how you spin it, the Bulgaria case is NOT a counter example to the Albania case. The court did not decide that Bulgaria was acting in accordance with self defence and so favoured Bulgaria. And no, I am not nitpicking, you are...

It's funny that you say you're giving me a last chance, when I've already given up on any chances with you. You're never going to get anything I post because you are concrete minded, and can only think in a linear fashion, and you know it. This is just what you need to accept. It is just how...

Sigh. This is all just your concrete mind speaking again. I don't think you're ever going to understand the value of what I posted. There will be 20 pages of you confusing yourself and nitpicking in your rigidly concrete and basic mindset, because you just don't know how to think in an abstract...

That's because you applied the wrong example to the wrong paradigm due to your concrete nature. Your lack of ability to make inferences is concerning. The Israel source was showing that (a) there is an existing notion that the international courts are biased and (b) accusations of the ICJ being...

And? That doesn't even make a difference. It's not just those specific examples, there is such a thing called intuition. I think I've realised why you don't "get" what I have been posting. It's just a clash on the approach in thoughts and discussion...

William Hung, I only made it in my previous post because you didn't get it from the start, and wanted me to explain. Your thinking is really lacking here because you asked me to explain, I then explained, and then you said I only mentioned it in my previous post. I still maintain that peer...

Yes I have. I know what I posted, I am the one who posted it. You are misinterpreting what I am posting. And you are not reading my posts properly because I have explained it in my previous comment. "Since the countries select their own arbitrators in the PCA and China is not attending, the...

William Hung I have already explained in detail to you but your level of thinking prohibits you from understanding how the evidence I have posted ties into the crux of this matter. You requested evidence that supports my speculations, which I have done. You did not request putative facts...

Okay guys let's not fuss about how people wash their dishes. Both China and Vietnam are developing, but China is a considered NIC category and is decidedly more developed with better infrastructure, education / research, public works and transportation, much bigger economy, and has much more...

Well if you stop Vietnamising Chinese like you do then we wouldn't even be talking about this. But it really got on my nerves so I couldn't help but point it out and hope that you stop abusing my culture. You need to look at the etmyology of "Hong Kong". Research it yourself. As others have...