Search results

So if someone told you that it's our own pashtun who are behind the movement you'd be okay with it ?

What "appropriate manner" woudl you like my lord ? So far all protests have been peaceful with 0 damage to public property or someones life (ofcourse the anti army speeches can be be an exception). Less than three months ago the bearded devil came and held the capital hostage, caused millions in...

All of them ? The ones in FATA ? The ones who came to Lahore and Peshawar for the protest ? The ones who are out advocating for the rights of the people of FATA ? The movement has support and endorsements from Afghanistan for very obvious reasons. But this habit where anyone who protests is...

Are these guys not Pakistani ?

Uhhh no. Sari has nothing to do with religion, it's based on culture. This is like saying Muslims shouldnt wear pants because it's "Christian religious dress". People dress according to the norms of where they live. Alot of Pakistani Hindus where shalwar kameez.

What should Indian Muslims wear ?

"Kasur (Lahore)". What does this even mean ? Are you missing some chromosomes ?

*Of the subcontinent.

A very stupid arguement given for these discrimination against these people is that if they want to avoid prosecution (because in banana republics you need to do such things) they should just abandon their religion and become Muslim. I don't have an opinion whether these guys are Muslims or not...

I might not be a 100% correct in this but it's kind of sad that this is the only thing you disputed.

I usually like to keep my replies logical but all I can say is that OP is a f***information idiot.

Ummmm no. Ahmedis are not allowed to serve in Pak army. And while they do work in govt institutions according to the demands of Khadim Wheelchair their identities might be exposed and their lives might be in danger. Muslims in India have it bad, but atleast they have freedom of identity. I don't...

Wait what ?

One has ideological motives and other has some character judgement issues. That's that. One is a terrorist and the other is trashy. Both represent a sizable fraction of their groups but it'd be stupid to judge the whole group due to their actions.

There's no "motive" behind this. All is just a cheap tactic that banks on the (pointless) hatred people have for Ahmedis. PMLN has played a smart move where they ceremonially disown Safdars stances and statements but still keep him barking because they know it'll get them those sweet sweet...

Still don't understand the whole logic behind this whole fiasco. If she is telling lies she will forever be condemned for it, if she is telling the truth then she will be victim blamed and character assassinated anyway. There's no scenario in which she will win.

Why is it a straw man arguement ? It's not a small number by any means. It's a hundred thousand TERRORISTS (with God knows how many tens of millions of sympathisers), so why can't a judgement be made in this case ? (Not to mention all 100,000 of them are men but I'm not out claiming that all men...

Why didn't you go through with the beautiful thing ?

I never understood this hate for Ahmedis. There are no Ahmedis terrorists nor have they ever tried to dominate Sunnis. Fact of the matter is that it's their presence alone that drives these mullahs crazy. And then ironically they also condemn the treatment of Muslims in India and the Middle East.

This is exactly why people make fun of Pakistanis for having an identity crisis. Replacing the name of a national hero with a nobody who did nothing for Pakistan. What's worse is that this is nothing but a political move to get a share of that racist votebank, and what's even worse is that this...