Search results

Well that is what this has reduced to. Name calling. Perhaps calling names is not a good idea if you want to advance your argument?

I think the definition of the term superpower is also different. For Indians the bar to be a a superpower is much lower. But yes we are in general obsessed with the idea of being a super power and being seen as such.

I have actually read full patent landscape reports and have a rather clear idea of SEPs. Perhaps @qwerrty can explain to you the role of Qualcomm in standards.

In fact it seems that you don't have any idea. Qualcomm is one of the leading players in the standardization game. It earns royalties worth billions every year. It is the leading player when it come to mobile broadband. There are only two companies as of now who have demonstrated a 5g...

Existence of the chip doesn't mean existence of the computer. Again if you want I can in detail give you the slides which Chinese experts presented both in SC 2017 as well as ICHPC 2017. Also one can really have a prototype with technology that exists. So the chip has to exist for the prototype.

No you won't. The first exascale supercomputer is set to feature only in late 2020 or early 2021 as of predictions now. China will have 3 exa scale prototypes within 24 months. But these are prototypes. Meaning they are set to test the technology etc. They will themselves not be capable...

A vast standard like this involves thousands of small standards and patents. Huawei is certainly very actively involved in making standards. But so are other companies like ZTE, Qualcomm, Intel, Ericsson, Nokia, Samsung, LG etc. These standards cover end to end communications. Huawei and...

Did you even try to read the article that you gave the link to here? It clearly states that Tianhe 2A will host Chinese indigenous coprocessors (or accelerators). The processors are still the same. And I knew this information much before you because I am into HPC. These slides are from a...