Search results

That will be a welcome confirmation of my suspicions.

China is not a superpower in any sense of the word, and never will be. Similarly, all talk of India being a super power, even in future, is ignorant foolishness. China cannot project its Military power, even in Asia. Similarly it has no soft power, having no ideology which can attract other...

And I too hope you have got gold for all those purchases made by the US. Those US treasury bonds cannot be encashed.

More than spineless political leaders, this state of affairs is evidence that the philosophy pf TTP finds support in a substantial part of citizenry and the security forces. Political leaders are subdued simply because they know that a large part of the electorate, maybe even the majority...

Why are mods closing threads arbitrarily? Case in point: http://www.defence.pk/forums/members-club/282042-arnab-goswami-completely-lost-his-mind-13.html#post4851046 It cannot be because the thread has meandered away from the original discussion because had that been the case, more than half...

I agree. Asfakullah Khan, hanged with Ram Prasad Bismil in Kakori conspiracy case was also a Pathan. Though I m sure Pakistani history has no place for this "terrorist". I agree. Asfakullah Khan, hanged with Ram Prasad Bismil in Kakori conspiracy case was also a Pathan. Though I m sure...

But he was a smart looking chap, you got to admit. And he outmaneuvered Gandhi.

Jinnah ji wouldn't have survived a day in Jail without his Cigars and the pork steaks washed down with Scotch.

Pakistani Punjabis were the bulk of the British Army which suppressed The mutiny of 1857 and captured Delhi. The entire North India had revolted and could never be relied upon again. Post 1857, the British gave up recruiting the Hindu higher castes of Ganga plains which earlier formed the bulk...

What happened to your reference about Indians calling Shahid Bhagat Singh a terrorist? Or are you ready to admit that you are a shameless liar?

Name a few Pakistani "freedom fighters", especially form the "martial" Punjabi "race".

In fact the Westerns always favoured Pakistanis because of their easy malleability and "cooperation". They are described as sporty, Pucca chaps - our kind, not always into analysis or deep thinking. The Indians, on the other hand are portrayed as intellectually arrogant, austere and impossible...

Everyone knows Punjabi Muslims were fanatically loyal to the British and never participated in Freedom struggle. So obviously, Sahid Bhagat Singh will be a terrorist for them.

Point out any references where Indians call him a terrorist. Either do that, or stop your shameless lying if you have even a shred of self respect.

Terrorist for whom? For you, or the British? I can understand the British calling him a terrorist. Do the Pakistanis consider him a terrorist too?

I m arguing with you and that Pakistani "Journalist" who is using this classification.

These are races? Maybe you should read up some class X anthropology before posting on an international forum.

Whats a martial race? Maybe you can start by enlightening us which are the races in Pakistan.

Indian and Pakistani punjabis are the same people. So if Indian Punjabis have roots in India, Pakistani Punjabis cannot have roots in Central Asia as there are often wont to claim.

Jihad is Pakistan's state policy? Then why the fake resistant to TTP? They should be welcomed with open arms.