Search results

We are not seriously compare Irland to China, are we?

of course it is. No matter what Pakistan or China claims. same goes with the indian fanboy claim that shaurya is not a ballistic missile. If it looks like a duck and walks like a duck, it is a duck. I have made my point clear. I will now leave this thread. Have fun.

lol... CM-400AKG Learn to read. starting from my first post in this thread.

Using that logic then all ballistic missile is hypersonic because we can just use the average speed. This ignores the fact that ballistic missile and hypersonic vehicles are complete different. Hypersonic missiles: Speed is the new stealth | The Economist These hypersonic vehicles are not...

Dude, you need to take it up with your indian "jounalist". I am not the one said that shaurya is a hypesonic cruisemissile. Nor that it travelled 700 km in 500 secs. If you accept the fact that mach 7,5 is its maximum speed on terminal phase, then you also agree it is a ballistic missile , not...

Tsk tsk. You are mistaken sloppy indian journalisme for real facts. The missile rose on the dot at 2.30 p.m. from a canister strapped on to the ground, climbed to an altitude of 40 km and sped at 7.5 Mach, that is, 7.5 times the speed of sound. It covered its full range of 700 km in 500...

When was the statement made. Links?

India successfully test fires Shaurya missile - Times Of India NEW DELHI: In a significant step towards boosting ''second-strike'' capabilities, India on Wednesday tested a new 600-km range 'Shaurya' ballistic missile, which can fired from underground silos unlike the Prithvi and Agni missiles.

Learn to read properly. We already have Hypersonic missile in our arsenal flying at Mach 7.5 since a long time. Now where in that sentence do you read the word ballistic missile?

Prove that it never leaves the atmosphere.

son. it is a ballistic missile... learn the difference.

Prove it

Yes they have. List of airliner shootdown incidents - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Korean Air Lines Flight 902 (KAL902, KE902) was a civilian airliner shot down by Soviet Sukhoi Su-15 fighters on April 20, 1978, near Murmansk, Russia, after it violated Soviet airspace and failed to respond...

The KAL 007 due to incompetence entered Soviet airspace, not once, but twice without identifying themselves. I am sure most civil airlines are smarter, well maybe not the korean ones. Last time I checked PLAAF has not shoot down any airlines. Now you gonna tell me they never ID aircraft before? :P

I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it. So this will be my last reply. It depends on what type of accident it is, Sherlock. Accidents happends. The difference lies in how it happened and how they are dealt with. Both the chinese and...

LMAO if you are having accidents in 2013 than you are certainly not ahead of them. Especially since one member of Sindhurakshak's crew was killed in a similar accident in 2010 while it was docked in the southern port of Visakhapatnam. Someone are so braindamaged that they see China everywhere.

Not among the brightest ones out there, are you? None of your two know a twit about safety. At least the chinese learned it the hard way. Your accident happened this year. Now do the math how far behind you are in safety routines.

And your reading skills are short and failing. I said : Son, one of your subs just recently got blowed up. That is how "good" you are. A nation who couldnt even save their own sailors. I dont recall ny chinese sub accident in the past decade. 2003-2013= 10 years. That means no accident in...

Son, one of your subs just recently got blowed up. That is how "good" you are. A nation who couldnt even save their own sailors. I dont recall ny chinese sub accident in the past decade.

How you run computer simulations on things you have not tested before? Even computer simulations have to based on something.