Search results

I never said that democratic countries will rise for India.what I concluded after reading a book of american writer that like India, china has many internal problems. So it will be most unpredictable situation if China attacks India instead of Taiwan.

In 71 I think a DEMOCRATIC country tried to help pakistan. But bcz of Soviets they had to run away.:mps:

If you have guts then attack.....I think your government fears that If they attack India then not only India but also many democracy supporters will rise against the communist party. Read China: Fragile Superpower by Susan L. Shirk (Assistant Secretary of state. Responsible for US-China...

Supported by Pakistan. Then also not able to fight against Indian forces. Moreover Indian forces never used Tanks, Drones, Other high end weapons to kill its own people while pakistan is doing it because of the US(Largest aid supplier to Pakistan).

Ahead of the meeting of the foreign ministers of India and Pakistan in New York, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh on Saturday urged Pakistan to shed its mindset of using terror as an instrument of state policy against New Delhi and take action against those involved in the terror attack on...

Sir As per the United Nations Security Resolution 47, it was recommended that pakistan should withdraw all its forces, tribesman and nationals from the kashmir and India should maintain minimum forces to maintain civil order in order to ensure fair plebiscite. But Pakistan ignored UN mandate...

peace can be there even without kashmir if pakistan wishes so. The moment Pakistan closes all its terrorist camps in Pakistan occupied Kashmir, there will be peace but sadly enough GoP is not even ready to add this in its agenda of meetings.........

Moreover do you really think that AP belongs to China?? Then why not in 62. You were heading towards AP but didnt take it?? You were advancing towards AP and it was your country only who declared a ceasefire.

To whom you are calling innocent?? China?? China has illegally occupied Tibet and Aksai Chin.

If you can bark and divert your AIDS from US against Indian then why cant we?? Moreover prove it that India is diverting funds for ILLEGAL OCCUPATION OF FOREIGN LAND. Its only pakistan who has ILLEGAL OCCUPATION OF FOREIGN LAND. Get some good doctor.

No need to worry!! Your J-17 are capable enough to take Su-30 MKI:partay:

Plz dont be jealous. We build it and you are far away from building it. Take Chinese help if you can.

I think you are educated enough to know the difference between "to sell" and "to lease". Now did it hurt??:smitten: ---------- Post added at 10:59 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:58 PM ---------- By the way why dont you get one nuke-sub from china???:sniper:

Obliviously PAF and GoP will take counter measures and the induction of J-11 and future induction of FC-20 are such step. Now which aircraft is better one will be decided in war(which I doubt would ever take place) so no need to go in that point. We should not forget that India and Pakistan are...

No first use policy applies to all including China. But the point is to be noted is that this is a theory. Why he said that it will not apply to china because of the fact that we acknowledge china to be more powerful than us. Although we have no first use policy but in a war i don't think that...

No it does not mean that Indonesia and Egypt have nuclear weapons. These countries have not ratified and they will ratify after India signs the pact along with Pakistan, N. Korea.

Sir its PC virus and not PC:taz:

India is capable enough and have faith in her armed forces. Thats the reason for declaring no first use policy. We know that our enemies cant win in conventional war, so there is no need to use nuclear weapon. Moreover with the launching of ATV we have 2nd strike capability. Please note...

Actually authors lack the political concept of federal Union......

gr8 news!!