Search results

:lol: You had me in splits.

^^ "This muslim", also knows, that there are 27 more states other than Gujrat, a thousand more mosques, other than Babri. "This muslim" also knows that aberrations do not make a rule.

AAAHHHH.....

Yes, Megasthenes' reference is one example. However, the term "India" did not have a political connotation then. It was a geographical reference.

Lets see, arms sale/supply on one hand, and medical help on another. Ummm....I am gonna go with medical help. Thank you very much. But I bet, Nimal Sripala de Silva is RAW agent/ Indian stooge or just playing to the gallery. :bunny:

That reminds of of that proverb. It has something to do with a glass house and a stone.:lol:

The author seems to have forgotten the July, 1983 riot in Cylone, that left over 3000 tamils dead, and which led to the formation of LTTE. She seems to have forgotten the 21st Feb, 1952, police killings of university students in Dhaka, which led to the idea of establishing Bengali national...

So basically you are ruing the fact that you have a country to call your own. Good going genius. So Indian media is being blamed for being more efficient and professional than BD media and the govt. Nice.

Well, it appears as a "new excuse", because you have never been told about the true official position that India takes, and the basis, on which she does so. It appears "tongue in cheek" because, you probably realise, that legal case against India is just as strong (or weak) as against Pakistan...

Yes, until conflict is resolved. No, and I strongly condemn any military excess. Which part ? Note carefully, that I was only providing counter argument to the belief that res. 98 is proof of fulfillment of Pakistan's end of bargain, as enshrined in doc. s/1100.

At least there will be one less reason to kill innocents, for. Ah, now the world can have some peace, knowing that the fear of ever watchful god and divine retribution will stop a jihadi from picking up that AK-47. ~ Peace ~

Incorrect. Commission is supposed to notify the GoI, when: “the tribesmen and Pakistan nationals” have withdrawn (completely), resulting in “terminating the situation, which was represented by the Government of India to the Security Council, as having occasioned the presence of Indian...

Man, these Ruskies have taken to capitalism like a fish takes to water. They have learned it faster than those American corporations.

Identity can’t precede the object, being identified with. “Pakistani” is the identity - a national identity at that, which came into being, with the coming into being of the state of Pakistan. One can’t apply this identity retrospectively, from the beginning of time, to...

^^ Correct.

In other words, anybody born in an area, which, due to an unfortunate twist of politics, is in modern Pakistan, becomes a Pakistani by default. Nationality, as much as I understand, is one's identity with respect to a nation, by reason of birth or naturalization (not to be confused with...

Vanishing river or vanishing population has got nothing to do with what we are discussing. Therfore irrelevant. Since, I have said nothing about the language of the script, and curiously enough, neither have O'connor and Robertson, your explanation of the language in an attempt to stake your...

Strawman argument. Irrelevant. Non-sequitor. First, you have ignored the fact, that this script is a possible copy of some original work. No one can say that the original work was not in some language popular in "Bharat". Second, the dating is not on the basis of language, but on the basis...

O'Connor & Robertson article, regarding Bakhshali script, is the only research paper that can be taken with some seriousness. The rest are, well, mere references to Brahmagupta, by non-historians, and therefore wouldn't count. However, some minor quibbles about that paper by O'Connor &...

Would that mean Manmohan Singh is a pakistani. Anyway, Johnny Ball (of MSN) is a mathematician and a showman. James Propp (of University of Wisconsin) is also a mathematician. None of them are historian. They were simply referencing someone else's work. Therefore they don't count. Can't say...