argh, the mod closed the thread.
Well, the excel formatting aside (why would you expect a peer reviewed source?) what about that list for superpower criterion do you find objectionable? ]]
I would say the premise of the list itself is flawed. It simply "assumes" that there can be only 3(at most) superpowers in the world at any given time. How did the author arrive at such a conclusion? why not 2 or 4?
Btw, the reason I asked for a peer reviewed source( even though there is no such thing as 'internationally recognized requirements for a "superpower" qualification) is that in a peer reviewed article at least basic questions such as "why is the limit set at 3" would have been asked and answered.
Well, the excel formatting aside (why would you expect a peer reviewed source?) what about that list for superpower criterion do you find objectionable? ]]
I would say the premise of the list itself is flawed. It simply "assumes" that there can be only 3(at most) superpowers in the world at any given time. How did the author arrive at such a conclusion? why not 2 or 4?
Btw, the reason I asked for a peer reviewed source( even though there is no such thing as 'internationally recognized requirements for a "superpower" qualification) is that in a peer reviewed article at least basic questions such as "why is the limit set at 3" would have been asked and answered.