What's new

Zakaria: Is India’s honeymoon with Narendra Modi coming to an end?

What will Modi do to bring Food Inflation Low...........Will he go for FDI in Retail...............But his party won't allow..........I wish he should have gone for Strong Reforms and cut down all subsidies.............and also scrapped Nrega...........
 
.
The point that is being made (& one I agree with) is that the initial period is the best time to push in serious reforms. The opposition would still be licking their wounds, the people more willing to allow the new person some leeway.....etc. Gets more difficult in the later years & the results won't show up for another 3-4 years, which is time that the government does not have. I wish Modi had moved more quickly on subsidies, the best example of something that could have been easily done is LPG subsidy. Should have increased the price by Rs150-200 per cylinder atleast & put the blame on the UPA. People absorbed rail hikes, they would have this too. Not like people buy cylinders of LPG every other day. Reducing number of cylinders at subsidized prices would have also benefited the finances. There is a heck a lot of diversion for commercial use, the same issue is true of kerosene which should have got a 4-5 Rs hike. It will become more difficult as the freshness of Modi's victory disappears. That is the argument that is being made,.

you are actually on point.

I was disappointed with the lack of economic reforms

see below


I don't follow domestic Indian economics, but what Zakaria seems to be saying is, not that the destination hasn't been reached, but that the journey hasn't started.



Zakaria's article seems aimed at the (westernized) Indian audience, not the general American public.

The Non-Resident Indians of course are bigger Modi fans than Indians in India themselves.
 
Last edited:
.
The Non-Resident Indians of course are bigger Modi fans than Indians in India themselves.

To me, Modi is like the Republicans, favored by business and higher income earners, while Congress is like the Democrats, favored by minorities and marginalized groups.

NRI would tend to be disproportionately in the first group, so more likely to be pro-Modi. Exception might be intellectual and socially progressive NRI's.
 
.
To me, Modi is like the Republicans, favored by business and higher income earners, while Congress is like the Democrats, favored by minorities and marginalized groups.

NRI would tend to be disproportionately in the first group, so more likely to be pro-Modi. Exception might be intellectual and socially progressive NRI's.
to use UK political parties.. BJP is like conservative (center right) and congress is like labour (center left)
blacks , desis and poorer among whites traditionally vote labour, but recently conservatives have attracted relatively affluent among minorities...
 
.
To me, Modi is like the Republicans, favored by business and higher income earners, while Congress is like the Democrats, favored by minorities and marginalized groups.

NRI would tend to be disproportionately in the first group, so more likely to be pro-Modi. Exception might be intellectual and socially progressive NRI's.

Congress is curious. They are centred around the descendants of Nehru. A loose confederation of gangsters, thugs and demagogues who realise they need the Gandhis to coalesce around and form a unified group to get a shot at power.

@Developereo The problem with Congress is that when I look at them, there is no leadership at this moment. No leader I can see leading them to defeat BJP or a leader who is competent to begin with.

As opposed to BJP who are a collection of gangsters, thugs and demagogues who have ridden on the coat-tails of Modi to power =p

to use UK political parties.. BJP is like conservative (center right) and congress is like labour (center left)
blacks , desis and poorer among whites traditionally vote labour, but recently conservatives have attracted relatively affluent among minorities...

In New Zealand we have Labour and national are the conservatives.

Traditionally immigrants have voted for Labour here. But they are losing that support base too. The left got demolished in New Zealand :)
 
Last edited:
.
to use UK political parties.. BJP is like conservative (center right) and congress is like labour (center left)
blacks , desis and poorer among whites traditionally vote labour, but recently conservatives have attracted relatively affluent among minorities...

Most two-party systems broadly fall into these two camps: one party tells the "haves" they will protect them from the "have nots" who are eager to get a free ride at their expense. The other party tells the "have nots" they will rein in the "haves" who are milking a system rigged to their advantage.

Congress is curious. They are centred around the descendants of Nehru. A loose confederation of gangsters, thugs and demagogues who realise they need the Gandhis to coalesce around and form a unified group to get a shot at power.

@Developereo The problem with Congress is that when I look at them, there is no leadership at this moment. No leader I can see leading them to defeat BJP or a leader who is competent to begin with.

As opposed to BJP who are a collection of gangsters, thugs and demagogues who have ridden on the coat-tails of Modi to power =p

You may be right, but I was talking more of what each party represents, or claims to represent.
 
.
Most two-party systems broadly fall into these two camps: one party tells the "haves" they will protect them from the "have nots" who are eager to get a free ride at their expense. The other party tells the "have nots" they will rein in the "haves" who are milking a system rigged to their advantage.



You may be right, but I was talking more of what each party represents, or claims to represent.

Zakaria is actually half right.

But then again, if I think about it, if India punished Modi massively next elections. Maybe religious polarisation has it's limits.

The world does run on money after all.

There was also heavy corporate backing for Modi as well. So Indian social hierachy has changed from Brahmins to...


Corporates? :unsure:

@Developereo also, like the Republicans use massive corporate backing and uses jingoism to mobilize the lower classes :)
 
.
@Developereo also, like the Republicans use massive corporate backing and uses jingoism to mobilize the lower classes :)

Both parties are sold out to corporate elites, but Republicans are probably more protective of corporate welfare.

As for jingoism, I heard that the US started more wars under Democratic administrations than under Republican. Don't know if it's true or electioneering, but that was the claim.
 
.
Both parties are sold out to corporate elites, but Republicans are probably more protective of corporate welfare.

As for jingoism, I heard that the US started more wars under Democratic administrations than under Republican. Don't know if it's true or electioneering, but that was the claim.

I can believe that. Both parties exhibit tendencies of Military adventurism.

But there is a small section within the Republicans who are isolationists and are libertarians. So there is nuances.

The whole Reagan big tent policy. You have the Religious conservatives, the national security hawks, and the free market advocates.
 
.
Modi is here to stay. His actions will speak for himself in the coming days. Inflation is already down and growth is picking up. Big bang reforms will follow soon. Bringing back black money stashed abroad will be a game changer

All good suggestions, but they are not enough.

For India to finally break free, Modi must arrest and prosecute the entire top and middle leadership of the Kangress party. At least 1 crore kangress members must be arrested right away.

That Italian whore and her family, including Robert Vadra, should be hanged from a lamp post.

India needs to be cleaned of the Kangress filth, and if 1 crore people have to die, then so be it.
 
. .
What will Modi do to bring Food Inflation Low...........Will he go for FDI in Retail...............But his party won't allow..........I wish he should have gone for Strong Reforms and cut down all subsidies.............and also scrapped Nrega...........

LOL at you understanding of Modi.

Indian PM Narendra Modi: Understanding an enigma - CNN.com

Editor's note: Ravi Agrawal is CNN's New Delhi bureau chief. He was part of the CNN team that exclusively spent time with Narendra Modi in his first interview since becoming India's Prime Minister. Follow him on Twitter.

New Delhi (CNN) -- Four months ago Narendra Modi emerged as the runaway winner of the world's biggest election in history. It was a surprising, overwhelming mandate for his Bharatiya Janata Party: no other Indian party had won a clear majority in parliament in three decades. Modi was the clear face of the party, the man millions of Indians believed could better their lives.
But who is Narendra Modi? What makes him tick? How has he evolved in his first role on the national stage? And what is his vision for India's foreign policy?

Modi has has not done any media interviews since becoming PM. Until now. CNN's Fareed Zakaria conducted the network's exclusive interview. As part of the CNN team that was there at the PM's residence at 7 Race Course Road, I got to spend a bit of time observing India's new, enigmatic, all-powerful leader.

A lot has been written about Modi in the last year. What hasn't gotten enough press -- a result of the lack of access -- is what PM Modi is like up close. Here are some thoughts about what I found interesting.

Modi's lighter side

Modi has a reputation -- at least in the press -- of being a serious man, an intimidating presence. Having never met him before, I was struck by his lighter side. Modi had a natural, easy sense of humor, the likes of which I've rarely seen when producing interviews with world leaders. When we were setting up for the interview, I asked him to do an audio test for us.

"What should I say?"

I asked him to count to ten.

"You're testing my primary education as well today?"

The tension broke; both sides were laughing.

Twenty minutes through the interview, we realized Modi's forehead had gotten shiny, perhaps because of the intense lighting. I stopped the interview, and asked our makeup artist to touch him up. "My sweat is the product of sixty years of toil, my friends," Modi announced to the room.
"Sixty seconds of makeup isn't going to help me!" Again, laughter all round. Modi was playing to the gallery.

Journalists often describe Modi as a politician of the right. He's pro-business, nationalist, talks about a leaner, smaller government, doesn't want to raise taxes. Indeed, he may be all of those things. But perhaps the left-or-right prism is a Western one, best applied to developed economies.

On foreign policy

There were serious moments as well. One of the things India-watchers asked when Modi was elected was how quickly he would adapt to the global stage. Modi, after all, had little experience in international diplomacy.

I've previously written about how Modi has been quick off the block in engaging leaders of other countries. What struck me about Modi in person was how his foreign policy is rooted not in international relations theory, but in history.

On China, Modi repeatedly referred to India's historical ties with China, and how the two countries had for centuries risen and fallen in sync.

When asked if he was worried about China's growing assertiveness in territorial disputes in the East China and South China Seas, Modi said: "India is different. It is a country of 1.25 billion people. We can't run our country if we get worried about every small thing."

"At the same time we can't close our eyes to problems. We're not living in the 18th century. This is an era of partnership. Everyone will have to seek and extend help mutually. China is also a country with an ancient cultural heritage," he added.

Modi pointed out how the world had changed since the 18th century. Back then, countries thought horizontally: they wanted to expand. Today, they think vertically, about building up their economies.

Certainly, the suggestion Modi made was that he was thinking vertically -- and he was expecting his neighbors to do the same.

Right or left?

Journalists often describe Modi as a politician of the right. He's pro-business, nationalist, talks about a leaner, smaller government, doesn't want to raise taxes. Indeed, he may be all of those things. But perhaps the left-or-right prism is a Western one, best applied to developed economies.

Modi struck me as a populist. He candidly talked about growing up poor, about traveling around the country and learning about life from coversations with regular people. He defended India's policy on subsidies.

For rich countries, subsidies are a political agenda, he said. "For poor countries, subsidies are a matter of life or death." Modi explained he was not going to budge on bringing in FDI (Foreign Direct Investment) in retail (a change many economists have called for) because he believed in a different kind of FDI -- First Develop India.
 
. . .
Just for fun ---:partay:

Modiji is the incarnation of Lord Shiva, he will destroy the old regime with his third eye, creation of a new India,
All opposition Modiji, Slander Modiji people are the devil incarnate, will be the fire devoured!

All Indians must praise Modiji !

Squint chink and **** , Modiji's will with his third eye, to destroy you!

Jai modiji
Jai Hind !-------------from Times of India Member
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom