Xinjiang, Tibet is part of Central South Asia not part of East Asia and was never part of China

[ManUNITEDglory]

Why is China allowed to stretched it's hand so deep withing Central South Asia lands. Why did national geographics allowed them to be part of East Asia ? China is the only country with a disproportioned unbalanced geographic territory in the entire countries of Asia. How is a country's border determined? Did China bribed/or pay money to the National Geographic Society to include those territories as part of East Asia ???
A clear red line should be drawn between Western shifted Asia and Eastern shifted Asia.

It is stupid that the map of " East Asia " includes portions of western shifted Asia. By their stupid logic India and Pakistani are also part of Eastern shifted Asia, also Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Maldives are more Eastern Asia than Xinjiang and Tibet or about the same ????

Even more stupid. If national geographic decides China can claim south-central Asia portions of the country as East Asia than so can Burma claim more western shifted lands as Southeast Asia. Say if one day Burma conquered India/Pakistan does that mean they would be included as Southeast Asia as well ? If China can do I don't see why other countries cannot do the same.

South-Central Asia is not complete without Xinjiang and Tibet

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

You are more then welcomed to bring a pen/marker / Crayon to attept to draw a Line

Pakistan /China and Russia will look forward to visit Our Missiles and Armies are ready

China can monitor you from above as you draw a line

 

[ManUNITEDglory]

Not only are they not geographically part of East Asia but this includes culturally, racially, linguistically nothing related with Chinese nor China.

No Turkic, no Iranians, no Indo-Aryans white mummies, no muslims are related with China.

Xinjiang and Tibet being part of China is not more but conquest. There is no historical connections between China and those lands.



Real China is this

Also let's get this clear. Xinjiang today is inhabited Turkic and Iranians ( indigenous people: Uyghurs and Pamiri ). Racially, geographically, culturally, linguistically nothing related with Chinese.


Pamiri

Uyghurs

They are part of South Asia. They are Tibeto-Burmese tribes not Chinese and for your info ancient Northeast India belong to proto-Australoid people even southern Burma used to belong to South Asian people


The British historian Daniel George Edward Hall stated that "The Burmese do not seem to have settled in Arakan until possibly as late as the tenth century AD. Hence earlier dynasties are thought to have been Indian, ruling over a population similar to that of Bengal. All the capitals known to history have been in the north near modern Akyab".[96]

One part of Xinjiang even includes Pamiri lands. The Pamiri used to live in a land much larger than within Xinjiang today. So not only Uyghurs deserve independence but also the Pamiris have right for independence.

 

[beijingwalker]

What about Russia? It stretches over 12 time zones with hundreds of ethnic groups living in it. China has 56 ethnic groups and even India has more.

 

[j20611]

I’m surprised Indians are taking the time to post, they’re usually creeping on their 8 month old relatives

 

[beijingwalker]

 

[ManUNITEDglory]

What about Russia? It stretches over 12 time zones with hundreds of ethnic groups living in it. China has 56 ethnic groups and even India has more.

I'm talking about geographic labels. Siberia is called North Asia in most maps, All South Asia lands are within South Asia. Western Pakistan is still in western shifted Asia unlike Xinjiang which is forced to be eastern shifted due to political reasons.

Siberia (northern Asia) has only few million people despite being the largest land in the world, 99.9999999999% of it's land it's not inhabited.

 

[Adam WANG SHANGHAI MEGA]

Not only are they not geographically part of East Asia but this includes culturally, racially, linguistically nothing related with Chinese nor China.

No Turkic, no Iranians, no Indo-Aryans white mummies, no muslims are related with China.

Xinjiang and Tibet being part of China is not more but conquest. There is no historical connections between China and those lands.



Real China is this

Also let's get this clear. Xinjiang today is inhabited Turkic and Iranians ( indigenous people: Uyghurs and Pamiri ). Racially, geographically, culturally, linguistically nothing related with Chinese.


Pamiri

Uyghurs

They are part of South Asia. They are Tibeto-Burmese tribes not Chinese and for your info ancient Northeast India belong to proto-Australoid people even southern Burma used to belong to South Asian people


The British historian Daniel George Edward Hall stated that "The Burmese do not seem to have settled in Arakan until possibly as late as the tenth century AD. Hence earlier dynasties are thought to have been Indian, ruling over a population similar to that of Bengal. All the capitals known to history have been in the north near modern Akyab".[96]

One part of Xinjiang even includes Pamiri lands. The Pamiri used to live in a land much larger than within Xinjiang today. So not only Uyghurs deserve independence but also the Pamiris have right for independence.

In your dream maybe,you make me laugh....!


Deputy Director, National Development and Reform Commission of China (at the ministerial level)and Director of China National Energy Administration
努尔·白克力
努尔·白克力，男，维吾尔族，1961年8月生，新疆博乐人，1982年12月加入中国共产党，1983年8月参加工作，中央党校研究生班政治理论专业毕业，中央党校研究生学历。

现任国家发展和改革委员会副主任（正部长级）、党组成员，国家能源局局长、党组书记。Nur Bai Ke Li , male, Uygur, born in August 1961, Xinjiang Bole Man, joined the Chinese Communist Party in December 1982 and joined the work in August 1983. He graduated from the Central Party School with a postgraduate degree in political theory and holds a postgraduate degree from the Central Party School. IncumbentNational Development and Reform CommissionDeputy director (at the ministerial level), party members, the National Energy Secretary, party secretary.


Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region deputy party secretary and provincial government chairman and government level party secretary.
雪克来提·扎克尔
雪克来提 · 扎克尔，男，维吾尔族，1953年8月生，新疆伊宁市人，1970年12月参加工作，1985年6月加入中国共产党，中央党校领导干部函授班经济管理专业毕业，中央党校大学学历，高级管理人员工商管理硕士。

现任新疆维吾尔自治区党委副书记、区政府主席、党组书记。
Kekti Zakol Male, Uygur, born in August 1953, a native of Yining City, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, joined the work in December 1970 and joined the leadership classes of the Communist Party of China and the Central Party School in June 1985. Graduated from the Central Party School University degree, senior management MBA. Incumbent Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region deputy party secretary, district government chairman, party secretary.


1
齐扎拉
齐扎拉，男，藏族，1958年8月生，云南香格里拉人，1982年5月加入中国共产党，1979年12月参加工作，中央党校研究生学历。

现任中国共产党第十九届中央委员会委员，西藏自治区党委副书记、区政府主席、党组书记。

Zizala, male, Tibetan, born in August 1958, Yunnan Shangri-La, 1982 May to join the Chinese Communist Party, 1979 December to participate in the work, the Central Party School graduate degree. The current Communist Party of China nineteenth Central Committee, deputy party secretary of Tibet Autonomous Region,provincial government chairman and regional gov party secretary.

 

[Tauren Paladin]

You should go the United Nations and tell them. Then security will throw you out on the streets and a dog poops on your face.

 

[shootingstar]

India would never abandon Tibet and Turkiye would never abandon East Turkestan.

 

[SBUS-CXK]

Not only are they not geographically part of East Asia but this includes culturally, racially, linguistically nothing related with Chinese nor China.

No Turkic, no Iranians, no Indo-Aryans white mummies, no muslims are related with China.

Xinjiang and Tibet being part of China is not more but conquest. There is no historical connections between China and those lands.



Real China is this

Also let's get this clear. Xinjiang today is inhabited Turkic and Iranians ( indigenous people: Uyghurs and Pamiri ). Racially, geographically, culturally, linguistically nothing related with Chinese.


Pamiri

Uyghurs

They are part of South Asia. They are Tibeto-Burmese tribes not Chinese and for your info ancient Northeast India belong to proto-Australoid people even southern Burma used to belong to South Asian people


The British historian Daniel George Edward Hall stated that "The Burmese do not seem to have settled in Arakan until possibly as late as the tenth century AD. Hence earlier dynasties are thought to have been Indian, ruling over a population similar to that of Bengal. All the capitals known to history have been in the north near modern Akyab".[96]

One part of Xinjiang even includes Pamiri lands. The Pamiri used to live in a land much larger than within Xinjiang today. So not only Uyghurs deserve independence but also the Pamiris have right for independence.

It's obvious. India does not belong to India.

India would never abandon Tibet and Turkiye would never abandon East Turkestan.

India and Turkey?? One rubbish plus another rubbish?

 

[shootingstar]

India and Turkey?? One rubbish plus another rubbish?

Chinese frustration is understandable.

 

[SBUS-CXK]

Chinese frustration is understandable.

Oh no, this is a joke. When I hear that the superpower has only 10 days of weapons stock.

Need links?

 

[shootingstar]

Oh no, this is a joke. When I hear that the superpower has only 10 days of weapons stock.

Need links?

Yet China is unable to make a weak India agree to toe its line. How sad..

 

[Adam WANG SHANGHAI MEGA]

Yet China is unable to make a weak India agree to toe its line. How sad..

We do not give a shit on waht you shit hole indians think,we only care economy development along with Iron bro PAK !
Let us just allow indians to live in their fantacy,that is after all the only freedom they have!

your line shows eas

Why is China allowed to stretched it's hand so deep withing Central South Asia lands. Why did national geographics allowed them to be part of East Asia ? China is the only country with a disproportioned unbalanced geographic territory in the entire countries of Asia. How is a country's border determined? Did China bribed/or pay money to the National Geographic Society to include those territories as part of East Asia ???
A clear red line should be drawn between Western shifted Asia and Eastern shifted Asia.

It is stupid that the map of " East Asia " includes portions of western shifted Asia. By their stupid logic India and Pakistani are also part of Eastern shifted Asia, also Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Maldives are more Eastern Asia than Xinjiang and Tibet or about the same ????

Even more stupid. If national geographic decides China can claim south-central Asia portions of the country as East Asia than so can Burma claim more western shifted lands as Southeast Asia. Say if one day Burma conquered India/Pakistan does that mean they would be included as Southeast Asia as well ? If China can do I don't see why other countries cannot do the same.

South-Central Asia is not complete without Xinjiang and Tibet

t india belongs to china are you sure!?