What's new

World Energy Hits a Turning Point: Solar That's Cheaper Than Wind

The Sandman

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Aug 26, 2015
Messages
8,645
Reaction score
16
Country
Pakistan
Location
Saudi Arabia
A transformation is happening in global energy markets that’s worth noting as 2016 comes to an end: Solar power, for the first time, is becoming the cheapest form of new electricity.

This has happened in isolated projects in the past: an especially competitive auction in the Middle East, for example, resulting in record-cheap solar costs. But now unsubsidized solar is beginning to outcompete coal and natural gas on a larger scale, and notably, new solar projects in emerging markets are costing less to build than wind projects, according to fresh data from Bloomberg New Energy Finance.

The chart below shows the average cost of new wind and solar from 58 emerging-market economies, including China, India, and Brazil. While solar was bound to fall below wind eventually, given its steeper price declines, few predicted it would happen this soon. 1

360x-1.jpg

Disclosed capex for onshore wind and PV projects in 58 non-OECD countries
Source: Bloomberg New Energy Finance
“Solar investment has gone from nothing—literally nothing—like five years ago to quite a lot,” said Ethan Zindler, head of U.S. policy analysis at BNEF. “A huge part of this story is China, which has been rapidly deploying solar” and helping other countries finance their own projects.

Half the Price of Coal
This year has seen a remarkable run for solar power. Auctions, where private companies compete for massive contracts to provide electricity, established record after record for cheap solar power. It started with a contract in January to produce electricity for $64 per megawatt-hour in India; then a deal in August pegging $29.10 per megawatt hour in Chile. That’s record-cheap electricity—roughly half the price of competing coal power.

“Renewables are robustly entering the era of undercutting” fossil fuel prices, BNEF chairman Michael Liebreich said in a note to clients this week.

Those are new contracts, but plenty of projects are reaching completion this year, too. When all the 2016 completions are tallied in coming months, it’s likely that the total amount of solar photovoltaics added globally will exceed that of wind for the first time. The latest BNEF projections call for 70 gigawatts of newly installed solar in 2016 compared with 59 gigawatts of wind.

The overall shift to clean energy can be more expensive in wealthier nations, where electricity demand is flat or falling and new solar must compete with existing billion-dollar coal and gas plants. But in countries that are adding new electricity capacity as quickly as possible, “renewable energy will beat any other technology in most of the world without subsidies,” said Liebreich.

Turning Points
The world recently passed a turning point and is adding more capacity for clean energy each year than for coal and natural gas combined. Peak fossil-fuel use for electricity may be reached within the next decade.

Thursday’s BNEF report, called Climatescope, ranks and profiles emerging markets for their ability to attract capital for low-carbon energy projects. The top-scoring markets were China, Chile, Brazil, Uruguay, South Africa, and India.

When it comes to renewable energy investment, emerging markets have taken the lead over the 35 member nations of the Organization for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD), spending $154.1 billion in 2015 compared with $153.7 billion by those wealthier countries, BNEF said. The growth rates of clean-energy deployment are higher in these emerging-market states, so they are likely to remain the clean energy leaders indefinitely, especially now that three-quarters have established clean-energy targets.

Still, the buildup of wind and solar takes time, and fossil fuels remain the cheapest option for when the wind doesn’t blow and the sun doesn’t shine. Coal and natural gas will continue to play a key role in the alleviation of energy poverty for millions of people in the years to come.

But for populations still relying on expensive kerosene generators, or who have no electricity at all, and for those living in the dangerous smog of thickly populated cities, the shift to renewables and increasingly to solar can’t come soon enough.
Source
@saiyan0321 @The Eagle @PaklovesTurkiye
 
. . .
If it's really that cheap why aren't we going for more solar? i mean i am not saying we shouldn't produce other power plants but our priority should be solar no?
@django @Mentee @Zibago @Hell hound @Moonlight
I once discussed this matter with my professor. He said Solar cell efficiency is the main factor. At that time it was very low, about 37% for the best cells produced by some German company. So its not viable yet for mass production.
 
.
everybody sees the fuss of solar in pakistan if it is realy that cheap then why was all this shit happened
 
. .
If it's really that cheap why aren't we going for more solar? i mean i am not saying we shouldn't produce other power plants but our priority should be solar no?
@django @Mentee @Zibago @Hell hound @Moonlight

Southern Punjab , northern Sindh and Balochistan has vast swaths of barren lands . this form of green energy isn't that cheap but, it can surely supply the national grid with ample number of megawatts in the long run.
 
.
If it's really that cheap why aren't we going for more solar? i mean i am not saying we shouldn't produce other power plants but our priority should be solar no?
@django @Mentee @Zibago @Hell hound @Moonlight
i think it is because of amount of rare minerals required for the panel construction and the inability to generate any energy for almost 12 hours a day
 
.
Pakistan unfortunately has financial problems to invest huge amounts of money in Solar power projects. We also should take into account that only recently Solar energy has become very competitive. So I guess that in the coming years Pakistan's focus will further shift towards Solar power.
 
Last edited:
.
If it's really that cheap why aren't we going for more solar? i mean i am not saying we shouldn't produce other power plants but our priority should be solar no?
@django @Mentee @Zibago @Hell hound @Moonlight
Solar is the future, the tech is becoming more efficient and we have it in abundance, for us folks it is ideal, prefer it to nuclear reactors.Kudos

i think it is because of amount of rare minerals required for the panel construction and the inability to generate any energy for almost 12 hours a day
The energy can be stored but it can be somewhat expensive yet the efficiency is improving.Kudos

Its requires huge one time investment
True, solar panel, regulator, battery and inverter, sastha nee lekhen long term advantage hai, beside in isolated areas advantage of solar photo voltaics is clear as they are not connected to grid.Kudos
 
. .
Imagine a world powered by the sun and the wind; wouldn't that be a sight to behold @Technogaianist ? :agree:

Wind power kills my Puffin friends and I haven't seen the Sun in over a week:angry:!! Bah Humbug!!

bird_watching_puffin_runde_alesund_norway_2_1_7291bb62-e468-4ae5-a230-7c4f553da1de.jpg


But I agree, that would be something. Despite being in the top 10 in both oil and gas exports (which comprise 17% of GDP), fossil fuels only make up a paltry 2% of Norway's power generation with only three partially active natural gas plants.

The rest comes from hydroelectric.

Alta-damm.jpg


Hydroelectric isn't exactly nature friendly, but it's abundant and renewable. I'd like more wind power too, but the turbines might clash with our oil platforms:D.

0068008-Heidrun-Photo-%C3%98yvind-Hagen-Statoil.jpg


Norway has several windfarms, such as Tellenes near Stavanger, but currently Google has the rights to its entire energy output for the next 12 years to power its regional operations.

tellenes-832x333.jpg


How about Pakistan? What are they doing in the renewable energy field?
 
.
storing and generating energy are two different thing.no matter how efficient batteries will get.you still have to generate enough energy for 24 hrs in 12hr duration.i think thats the bottle neck of the solar power.
 
.
Solar is the future, the tech is becoming more efficient and we have it in abundance, for us folks it is ideal, prefer it to nuclear reactors.Kudos


The energy can be stored but it can be somewhat expensive yet the efficiency is improving.Kudos


True, solar panel, regulator, battery and inverter, sastha nee lekhen long term advantage hai, beside in isolated areas advantage of solar photo voltaics is clear as they are not connected to grid.Kudos
I was at a seminar on solar panels last month they are about to introduce new focus beam lens technology in Pakistan which is more suited for Pakistan and is cheaper
 
.
How about Pakistan? What are they doing in the renewable energy field?

I'm not entirely sure how we're performing in the renewable energy sector but I do know that we produce quite a few of our energy from hydro-electric and that we're investing in a few solar and wind energy farms. Ideally we ought to have built and operationalised a couple of large and countless many small to micro dams over the decades but this upper riparian and lower riparian thing between different federating units of Pakistan has effectively held those projects hostage.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom