What's new

Will Pakistan and Bangladesh bury the hatchet?

Black_cats

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Dec 31, 2010
Messages
10,031
Reaction score
-5

Will Pakistan and Bangladesh bury the hatchet?​

Editor
by Editor

February 20, 2023
Reading Time: 6 mins read
A A
By P.K.Balachandran/Ceylon Today
Colombo, February 20:

On the sidelines of Sri Lanka’s 74 th. Independence Day celebrations in Colombo earlier this month, Pakistan’s State Minister of Foreign Affairs, Hina Rabbani Khar, sought a bilateral meeting with the Bangladesh Foreign Minister A.K. Abdul Momen. As per established practice, the request was granted.

While the media readout on the discussions merely said that the two leaders discussed ways to improve ties, the Indian news agency ANI reported that Momen reiterated his government’s consistent position that normalization could not take place until Pakistan officially and unconditionally apologized for the atrocities committed by its army in the months preceding Bangladesh’s birth in December 1971. Though the number of civilians killed in the seven-month liberation war is disputed, it was humongous by all accounts.

Pakistan’s response to the demand for a formal apology, since it was first made during Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina’s first term in 1996, has been that its leaders had more than once “regretted” the happenings. But in Bangladesh’s view, these did not amount to an official apology or acceptance of guilt.

Against this, Pakistan’s view has been that the two countries should not be prisoners of the past. But this does not cut ice with Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina and the pro-liberation support base of her party, the Awami League (AL). The AL had spearheaded the liberation movement against Pakistan under the leadership of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, Hasina’s father.

However, it is not as if attempts have never been made for a rapprochement. But these efforts eventually failed. That was so even when the rulers in Dhaka were well- disposed towards Pakistan, like Gen. Ziaur Rahman, Gen.H. M. Ershad and Khaleda Zia. In fact, Sheikh Mujib himself had reached out to Pakistan in 1973-74, a couple of years before he was assassinated by pro-Pakistan junior army officers.

Musharraf with Khaleda Zia

The initial euphoria over the liberation of Bangladesh with the help of the Indian army wore out by 1973. Bangladesh was facing severe economic problems and Mujib’s dictatorial rule. Mujib was getting unpopular.

Thinking that his close links with liberator India had become a liability, he distanced himself from it, shed his government’s secular claims, and asserted Bangladesh’s Islamic identity. He joined the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) in February 1974 and in June 1974 got Pakistan Prime Minister Z.A. Bhutto to pay a state visit.

At the tripartite talks held between India, Pakistan and Bangladesh in April 1974 to end the 1971 conflict, Mujib did not raise the issue of an official apology from Pakistan, according to Moonis Ahmar, author of Pakistan-Bangladesh relations – Prospects and Way Forward. Ahmar notes that Mujib even granted amnesty to those who collaborated with the Pakistan Army.

After Mujib was assassinated by a group of pro-Pakistan army officers in August 1975, the successor regimes of Gen. Ziaur Rahman, Gen.H.M.Ershad and Khaleda Zia carried forward the policy of Islamization and mending ties with Pakistan. Ziaur Rahman journeyed to Pakistan and improved trade relations. In 1977, Pakistan was Bangladesh’s second-largest trading partner after the US.

Presidents Zia and Ershad and Prime Minister Khaleda Zia were using Pakistan as a bulwark against India. The trio had serious issues with India over river waters sharing, the definition of the border and the shelter given to anti-Indian terror groups in Bangladesh.

However, it did not take long for these regimes to become unpopular on grounds of non-performance and misrule. But their strategy of securing legitimacy by playing the Islamic and anti-Indian/pro-Pakistan cards failed. These neither delivered the goods domestically nor to a detente with Pakistan.

Even the pro-Pakistan Bangladesh regimes wanted the return of Bangladesh’s assets in the possession of Pakistan (estimated at US$ 4.5 billion) and the repatriation of the 230,000 Biharis who had sided with the Pakistani army during the liberation war. But Pakistan demanded that the pre-war liabilities be shared. These issues were raised by Khaleda when the Pakistani military ruler Gen.Pervez Musharraf visited Dhaka in 2002.

Though not in power, the pro-liberation and anti-Pakistan constituency in Bangladesh was substantial. It was revitalized when Mujib’s doughty daughter, Sheikh Hasina, returned from exile in India in 1981. This was a watershed in the history of Bangladesh-Pakistan relations because when she came to power for the first time in 1996, she demanded an unconditional and official apology from Pakistan for the atrocities of 1971. In 2003 she executed Jamaat-e-Islami activists on charges of collaboration in Pakistan’s war crimes in 1971. The Pakistani protest over the executions only widened the gap.

While Bangladesh is unquestionably an Islamic State, it is difficult for any Bangladeshi political party to rely only on the Islamic card to have any special ties with Islamic Pakistan. Other factors play and have played key roles in shaping bilateral relations. Since 2009, Bangladeshi parties other than the Awami League, have been existing only on the margins. Therefore, the Awami League’s view of the liberation movement, the war and Pakistani war crimes, is the dominant narrative in Bangladesh.

Given the economic boom Bangladesh has been experiencing in the last decade, and its wide-ranging social achievements, Dhaka can now afford to be choosy in selecting its friends. Although Bangladesh’s growth rate is expected to come down from 7% to 5.5% in 2023 and it has had to go for an IMF loan of US4 4.7 billion, the country has been doing better than Pakistan across the board.

Hina Rabbani Khar with Sheikh Hasina
Writing in Business Recorder in December 2022, Bilal Hussain quotes the World Bank to say that Bangladesh’s GDP had increased from US$ 8.75 billion in 1971 to US$ 416 billion in 2021. On the other hand, Pakistan’s GDP stood at US$ 346 billion in 2021 after being ahead with US$ 10.67 billion in 1971. Bangladesh’s per capita income was US$ 2,503 – over 60% higher than Pakistan’s US$ 1,538. Its foreign exchange reserves stood at US$ 30 billion — roughly four months of import cover.

Pakistan’s reserves stand at US$ 6.7 billion — less than 1.5 months of import cover, Hussain points out.

Life expectancy in Bangladesh is 73 years against Pakistan’s 67. In Bangladesh, 96% of people have access to electricity while in Pakistan that number is 75%.

Pakistan cannot match India as a development partner for Bangladesh because India is also leapfrogging. Bangladesh and India are inter-twined in multifarious ways since Hasina came to power in 2009. While it cannot be denied that India and Bangladesh have issues between them such as river waters-sharing and slow execution of projects, and there is a vocal anti-Indian lobby in Bangladesh, Dhaka would rather have good relations with a growing India than abandon it for Pakistan which has little to offer.

India was Bangladesh’s second-largest trade partner in 2022. Bilateral trade increased to US$ 18.2 billion in 2022 as against US$10.8 billion in 2021. In contrast, Pakistan’s exports to Bangladesh were US$ 583.44 million in 2020 and its imports from Bangladesh were US 61.94 million in 2020.

While the Hasina regime will continue to insist on Pakistan’s rendering an official apology for the events of 1971, Pakistan will not oblige.

Any chance of an apology disappeared when the retiring Pakistani army chief Gen. Qamar Javed Bajwa told an invited audience in November 2022, that the army could not be blamed for the events of 1971 and that criticism of it had been “indecent” and “intolerable”. Given the dominant position of the army in Pakistan, its politicians dare not let it down by apologizing publicly.

END
https://newsin.asia/will-pakistan-and-bangladesh-bury-the-hatchet/
 
. . . . .
I'm not a PTI fanboy who thinks election and IK will fix everything. IKs next government will not be very different from previous one. The snakes in GHQ will continue to rule and they will wipe out Pakistan from the map.
transformation is in progress sir it will take time to get back powers but slowly things will hapen . GHQ is not strong as it was once upon a time . today even GHQ is sitting in corner thinking what happened .
 
.

Will Pakistan and Bangladesh bury the hatchet?​

Editor
by Editor

February 20, 2023
Reading Time: 6 mins read
A A
By P.K.Balachandran/Ceylon Today
Colombo, February 20:

On the sidelines of Sri Lanka’s 74 th. Independence Day celebrations in Colombo earlier this month, Pakistan’s State Minister of Foreign Affairs, Hina Rabbani Khar, sought a bilateral meeting with the Bangladesh Foreign Minister A.K. Abdul Momen. As per established practice, the request was granted.

While the media readout on the discussions merely said that the two leaders discussed ways to improve ties, the Indian news agency ANI reported that Momen reiterated his government’s consistent position that normalization could not take place until Pakistan officially and unconditionally apologized for the atrocities committed by its army in the months preceding Bangladesh’s birth in December 1971. Though the number of civilians killed in the seven-month liberation war is disputed, it was humongous by all accounts.

Pakistan’s response to the demand for a formal apology, since it was first made during Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina’s first term in 1996, has been that its leaders had more than once “regretted” the happenings. But in Bangladesh’s view, these did not amount to an official apology or acceptance of guilt.

Against this, Pakistan’s view has been that the two countries should not be prisoners of the past. But this does not cut ice with Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina and the pro-liberation support base of her party, the Awami League (AL). The AL had spearheaded the liberation movement against Pakistan under the leadership of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, Hasina’s father.

However, it is not as if attempts have never been made for a rapprochement. But these efforts eventually failed. That was so even when the rulers in Dhaka were well- disposed towards Pakistan, like Gen. Ziaur Rahman, Gen.H. M. Ershad and Khaleda Zia. In fact, Sheikh Mujib himself had reached out to Pakistan in 1973-74, a couple of years before he was assassinated by pro-Pakistan junior army officers.

Musharraf with Khaleda Zia

The initial euphoria over the liberation of Bangladesh with the help of the Indian army wore out by 1973. Bangladesh was facing severe economic problems and Mujib’s dictatorial rule. Mujib was getting unpopular.

Thinking that his close links with liberator India had become a liability, he distanced himself from it, shed his government’s secular claims, and asserted Bangladesh’s Islamic identity. He joined the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) in February 1974 and in June 1974 got Pakistan Prime Minister Z.A. Bhutto to pay a state visit.

At the tripartite talks held between India, Pakistan and Bangladesh in April 1974 to end the 1971 conflict, Mujib did not raise the issue of an official apology from Pakistan, according to Moonis Ahmar, author of Pakistan-Bangladesh relations – Prospects and Way Forward. Ahmar notes that Mujib even granted amnesty to those who collaborated with the Pakistan Army.

After Mujib was assassinated by a group of pro-Pakistan army officers in August 1975, the successor regimes of Gen. Ziaur Rahman, Gen.H.M.Ershad and Khaleda Zia carried forward the policy of Islamization and mending ties with Pakistan. Ziaur Rahman journeyed to Pakistan and improved trade relations. In 1977, Pakistan was Bangladesh’s second-largest trading partner after the US.

Presidents Zia and Ershad and Prime Minister Khaleda Zia were using Pakistan as a bulwark against India. The trio had serious issues with India over river waters sharing, the definition of the border and the shelter given to anti-Indian terror groups in Bangladesh.

However, it did not take long for these regimes to become unpopular on grounds of non-performance and misrule. But their strategy of securing legitimacy by playing the Islamic and anti-Indian/pro-Pakistan cards failed. These neither delivered the goods domestically nor to a detente with Pakistan.

Even the pro-Pakistan Bangladesh regimes wanted the return of Bangladesh’s assets in the possession of Pakistan (estimated at US$ 4.5 billion) and the repatriation of the 230,000 Biharis who had sided with the Pakistani army during the liberation war. But Pakistan demanded that the pre-war liabilities be shared. These issues were raised by Khaleda when the Pakistani military ruler Gen.Pervez Musharraf visited Dhaka in 2002.

Though not in power, the pro-liberation and anti-Pakistan constituency in Bangladesh was substantial. It was revitalized when Mujib’s doughty daughter, Sheikh Hasina, returned from exile in India in 1981. This was a watershed in the history of Bangladesh-Pakistan relations because when she came to power for the first time in 1996, she demanded an unconditional and official apology from Pakistan for the atrocities of 1971. In 2003 she executed Jamaat-e-Islami activists on charges of collaboration in Pakistan’s war crimes in 1971. The Pakistani protest over the executions only widened the gap.

While Bangladesh is unquestionably an Islamic State, it is difficult for any Bangladeshi political party to rely only on the Islamic card to have any special ties with Islamic Pakistan. Other factors play and have played key roles in shaping bilateral relations. Since 2009, Bangladeshi parties other than the Awami League, have been existing only on the margins. Therefore, the Awami League’s view of the liberation movement, the war and Pakistani war crimes, is the dominant narrative in Bangladesh.

Given the economic boom Bangladesh has been experiencing in the last decade, and its wide-ranging social achievements, Dhaka can now afford to be choosy in selecting its friends. Although Bangladesh’s growth rate is expected to come down from 7% to 5.5% in 2023 and it has had to go for an IMF loan of US4 4.7 billion, the country has been doing better than Pakistan across the board.

Hina Rabbani Khar with Sheikh Hasina
Writing in Business Recorder in December 2022, Bilal Hussain quotes the World Bank to say that Bangladesh’s GDP had increased from US$ 8.75 billion in 1971 to US$ 416 billion in 2021. On the other hand, Pakistan’s GDP stood at US$ 346 billion in 2021 after being ahead with US$ 10.67 billion in 1971. Bangladesh’s per capita income was US$ 2,503 – over 60% higher than Pakistan’s US$ 1,538. Its foreign exchange reserves stood at US$ 30 billion — roughly four months of import cover.

Pakistan’s reserves stand at US$ 6.7 billion — less than 1.5 months of import cover, Hussain points out.

Life expectancy in Bangladesh is 73 years against Pakistan’s 67. In Bangladesh, 96% of people have access to electricity while in Pakistan that number is 75%.

Pakistan cannot match India as a development partner for Bangladesh because India is also leapfrogging. Bangladesh and India are inter-twined in multifarious ways since Hasina came to power in 2009. While it cannot be denied that India and Bangladesh have issues between them such as river waters-sharing and slow execution of projects, and there is a vocal anti-Indian lobby in Bangladesh, Dhaka would rather have good relations with a growing India than abandon it for Pakistan which has little to offer.

India was Bangladesh’s second-largest trade partner in 2022. Bilateral trade increased to US$ 18.2 billion in 2022 as against US$10.8 billion in 2021. In contrast, Pakistan’s exports to Bangladesh were US$ 583.44 million in 2020 and its imports from Bangladesh were US 61.94 million in 2020.

While the Hasina regime will continue to insist on Pakistan’s rendering an official apology for the events of 1971, Pakistan will not oblige.

Any chance of an apology disappeared when the retiring Pakistani army chief Gen. Qamar Javed Bajwa told an invited audience in November 2022, that the army could not be blamed for the events of 1971 and that criticism of it had been “indecent” and “intolerable”. Given the dominant position of the army in Pakistan, its politicians dare not let it down by apologizing publicly.

END
https://newsin.asia/will-pakistan-and-bangladesh-bury-the-hatchet/


BD must not waver on splitting of national asset under any circumstances irrespective that pakistan is now the actual basket case.

Their economy may in time get out of the cyclical default/bust/get more loan cycle and improve.

At the end of the day during our union the regime thought defense of BD laid in the west. The position that PK is any kind of bulwark against india was nonsense then and is nonsense now.

BD interest must be the only thing that matters. We should seek to increase people to people interaction and economic relationship as such things are always positive. But at a state level BD has little to gain from pk which is now a failed state in retreat everywhere with its ministers pronouncing it has defaulted only this week and has started to sell off its embassy building in US to raise funds.

In summary BD has nothing to gain.
 
. .
We will bury the hatchet without any Pajeet interference or Pajeet revisionist history being referenced.

While we respect and care for our Bengali Muslim brothers, politically it's not a necessity although I would like to see collaboration in certain areas. Maybe we could pool together brains and resources in defence R&D as well as the education sector.
 
.

Will Pakistan and Bangladesh bury the hatchet?​

Editor
by Editor

February 20, 2023
Reading Time: 6 mins read
A A
By P.K.Balachandran/Ceylon Today
Colombo, February 20:

On the sidelines of Sri Lanka’s 74 th. Independence Day celebrations in Colombo earlier this month, Pakistan’s State Minister of Foreign Affairs, Hina Rabbani Khar, sought a bilateral meeting with the Bangladesh Foreign Minister A.K. Abdul Momen. As per established practice, the request was granted.

While the media readout on the discussions merely said that the two leaders discussed ways to improve ties, the Indian news agency ANI reported that Momen reiterated his government’s consistent position that normalization could not take place until Pakistan officially and unconditionally apologized for the atrocities committed by its army in the months preceding Bangladesh’s birth in December 1971. Though the number of civilians killed in the seven-month liberation war is disputed, it was humongous by all accounts.

Pakistan’s response to the demand for a formal apology, since it was first made during Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina’s first term in 1996, has been that its leaders had more than once “regretted” the happenings. But in Bangladesh’s view, these did not amount to an official apology or acceptance of guilt.

Against this, Pakistan’s view has been that the two countries should not be prisoners of the past. But this does not cut ice with Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina and the pro-liberation support base of her party, the Awami League (AL). The AL had spearheaded the liberation movement against Pakistan under the leadership of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, Hasina’s father.

However, it is not as if attempts have never been made for a rapprochement. But these efforts eventually failed. That was so even when the rulers in Dhaka were well- disposed towards Pakistan, like Gen. Ziaur Rahman, Gen.H. M. Ershad and Khaleda Zia. In fact, Sheikh Mujib himself had reached out to Pakistan in 1973-74, a couple of years before he was assassinated by pro-Pakistan junior army officers.

Musharraf with Khaleda Zia

The initial euphoria over the liberation of Bangladesh with the help of the Indian army wore out by 1973. Bangladesh was facing severe economic problems and Mujib’s dictatorial rule. Mujib was getting unpopular.

Thinking that his close links with liberator India had become a liability, he distanced himself from it, shed his government’s secular claims, and asserted Bangladesh’s Islamic identity. He joined the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) in February 1974 and in June 1974 got Pakistan Prime Minister Z.A. Bhutto to pay a state visit.

At the tripartite talks held between India, Pakistan and Bangladesh in April 1974 to end the 1971 conflict, Mujib did not raise the issue of an official apology from Pakistan, according to Moonis Ahmar, author of Pakistan-Bangladesh relations – Prospects and Way Forward. Ahmar notes that Mujib even granted amnesty to those who collaborated with the Pakistan Army.

After Mujib was assassinated by a group of pro-Pakistan army officers in August 1975, the successor regimes of Gen. Ziaur Rahman, Gen.H.M.Ershad and Khaleda Zia carried forward the policy of Islamization and mending ties with Pakistan. Ziaur Rahman journeyed to Pakistan and improved trade relations. In 1977, Pakistan was Bangladesh’s second-largest trading partner after the US.

Presidents Zia and Ershad and Prime Minister Khaleda Zia were using Pakistan as a bulwark against India. The trio had serious issues with India over river waters sharing, the definition of the border and the shelter given to anti-Indian terror groups in Bangladesh.

However, it did not take long for these regimes to become unpopular on grounds of non-performance and misrule. But their strategy of securing legitimacy by playing the Islamic and anti-Indian/pro-Pakistan cards failed. These neither delivered the goods domestically nor to a detente with Pakistan.

Even the pro-Pakistan Bangladesh regimes wanted the return of Bangladesh’s assets in the possession of Pakistan (estimated at US$ 4.5 billion) and the repatriation of the 230,000 Biharis who had sided with the Pakistani army during the liberation war. But Pakistan demanded that the pre-war liabilities be shared. These issues were raised by Khaleda when the Pakistani military ruler Gen.Pervez Musharraf visited Dhaka in 2002.

Though not in power, the pro-liberation and anti-Pakistan constituency in Bangladesh was substantial. It was revitalized when Mujib’s doughty daughter, Sheikh Hasina, returned from exile in India in 1981. This was a watershed in the history of Bangladesh-Pakistan relations because when she came to power for the first time in 1996, she demanded an unconditional and official apology from Pakistan for the atrocities of 1971. In 2003 she executed Jamaat-e-Islami activists on charges of collaboration in Pakistan’s war crimes in 1971. The Pakistani protest over the executions only widened the gap.

While Bangladesh is unquestionably an Islamic State, it is difficult for any Bangladeshi political party to rely only on the Islamic card to have any special ties with Islamic Pakistan. Other factors play and have played key roles in shaping bilateral relations. Since 2009, Bangladeshi parties other than the Awami League, have been existing only on the margins. Therefore, the Awami League’s view of the liberation movement, the war and Pakistani war crimes, is the dominant narrative in Bangladesh.

Given the economic boom Bangladesh has been experiencing in the last decade, and its wide-ranging social achievements, Dhaka can now afford to be choosy in selecting its friends. Although Bangladesh’s growth rate is expected to come down from 7% to 5.5% in 2023 and it has had to go for an IMF loan of US4 4.7 billion, the country has been doing better than Pakistan across the board.

Hina Rabbani Khar with Sheikh Hasina
Writing in Business Recorder in December 2022, Bilal Hussain quotes the World Bank to say that Bangladesh’s GDP had increased from US$ 8.75 billion in 1971 to US$ 416 billion in 2021. On the other hand, Pakistan’s GDP stood at US$ 346 billion in 2021 after being ahead with US$ 10.67 billion in 1971. Bangladesh’s per capita income was US$ 2,503 – over 60% higher than Pakistan’s US$ 1,538. Its foreign exchange reserves stood at US$ 30 billion — roughly four months of import cover.

Pakistan’s reserves stand at US$ 6.7 billion — less than 1.5 months of import cover, Hussain points out.

Life expectancy in Bangladesh is 73 years against Pakistan’s 67. In Bangladesh, 96% of people have access to electricity while in Pakistan that number is 75%.

Pakistan cannot match India as a development partner for Bangladesh because India is also leapfrogging. Bangladesh and India are inter-twined in multifarious ways since Hasina came to power in 2009. While it cannot be denied that India and Bangladesh have issues between them such as river waters-sharing and slow execution of projects, and there is a vocal anti-Indian lobby in Bangladesh, Dhaka would rather have good relations with a growing India than abandon it for Pakistan which has little to offer.

India was Bangladesh’s second-largest trade partner in 2022. Bilateral trade increased to US$ 18.2 billion in 2022 as against US$10.8 billion in 2021. In contrast, Pakistan’s exports to Bangladesh were US$ 583.44 million in 2020 and its imports from Bangladesh were US 61.94 million in 2020.

While the Hasina regime will continue to insist on Pakistan’s rendering an official apology for the events of 1971, Pakistan will not oblige.

Any chance of an apology disappeared when the retiring Pakistani army chief Gen. Qamar Javed Bajwa told an invited audience in November 2022, that the army could not be blamed for the events of 1971 and that criticism of it had been “indecent” and “intolerable”. Given the dominant position of the army in Pakistan, its politicians dare not let it down by apologizing publicly.

END
https://newsin.asia/will-pakistan-and-bangladesh-bury-the-hatchet/
No they won't and but we did already (though we shouldn't have)
But I ask bengaldeah to ask for repriations from UK as well after they killed a lot more then we did
 
.
These stupid gooses, thinks it’s if Hina Rabbni khair met BD FM or whoever as a customary duties to her visit means they can start their stupid demands. Next time Pakistan should demand official apology from Bangladesh for killing of biharis and treachery.

I took BD forever to improve it economy to Pakistan level. When Pakistan was technically in war situation for last 20 years these silly gooses think Pakistan cannot fix it’s economic issues and progress and leave them behind like it always did.
 
.
other than common religion there is no synergy between the two nations...trade is negligible...there is no political influence that either can use for each other...there is disturbing historical memories in the minds of ppl of BD..pak doesnt consider BD an important nation...BD's demand for apology has no takers in Pak...and on top of it, there is no political sincere interest to become friends or allies...enough points to rule out any possibility in near future
 
.
These stupid gooses, thinks it’s if Hina Rabbni khair met BD FM or whoever as a customary duties to her visit means they can start their stupid demands. Next time Pakistan should demand official apology from Bangladesh for killing of biharis and treachery.

I took BD forever to improve it economy to Pakistan level. When Pakistan was technically in war situation for last 20 years these silly gooses think Pakistan cannot fix it’s economic issues and progress and leave them behind like it always did.

Its always diaspora living in the west saying this wack type of shit. I don't understand.

other than common religion there is no synergy between the two nations...trade is negligible...there is no political influence that either can use for each other...there is disturbing historical memories in the minds of ppl of BD..pak doesnt consider BD an important nation...BD's demand for apology has no takers in Pak...and on top of it, there is no political sincere interest to become friends or allies...enough points to rule out any possibility in near future
There is synergy between the people of the two nations. Religion and shared cultural aspects. Pakistani and Bangladeshi diaspora tend to get along just fine in other countries and often inter-marry. Many people from Bangladesh admire IK. What happened in the past is slowly fading away in the minds of younger generations - its only natural such things happen.

In an ideal world the two countries do work together and it results in great benefit for both parties. But sadly...the circumstances are too different and a huge opportunity has been carelessly lost. I think the muslim SEA countries will increasingly fill this gap for Bangladesh.
 
. .
transformation is in progress sir it will take time to get back powers but slowly things will hapen . GHQ is not strong as it was once upon a time . today even GHQ is sitting in corner thinking what happened .
I know this positivity is due to IK stepping out of his house. I call it euphoria. Pakistani people always do that without knowing what the end goal is and how to achieve that goal.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom