What's new

Will India ethnically cleanse Kashmir of Muslims into Pakistan like Myanmar did with Rohingya?????

I don't think so. Unfortunately, Muslims in Myanmar were very weak with no international support. This is not the case in Kashmir. If india tries any such adventure they will have to pay a hefty price.
I dont smell the any international support either? also please dont name the Trump, he is just playing with peace deal very well. Not at all interested otherwise.
 
.
Neither Bengalis nor Rohingyas are Dravidians. They are both Indo-Aryans. In fact the Burmese are not Aryans.



Bengalis and Rihingyas are NOT Indo-Aryans. The REAL Indo-Aryans are Pakistanis, Kashmiris, Iranians and Afghans. Some Arabs and Turks are too. As are some Armenians and Chechens. That's about it.
 
.
I dont smell the any international support either? also please dont name the Trump, he is just playing with peace deal very well. Not at all interested otherwise.
Not even a single country had said anything apart from lip services.
 
.
I dont smell the any international support either? also please dont name the Trump, he is just playing with peace deal very well. Not at all interested otherwise.
As far as trump is concerned, agreed. he is just playing nice words in return of a peace deal with the Taliban. But Pakistan will not leave Kashmiris alone and also Pakistan has some influence in OIC. Maybe we will succeed to influence some of the middle eastern countries to pressurize India using their power and relation in the western world..
 
.
Bengalis and Rihingyas are NOT Indo-Aryans. The REAL Indo-Aryans are Pakistanis, Kashmiris, Iranians and Afghans. Some Arabs and Turks are too. As are some Armenians and Chechens. That's about it.

Okay. You just called Iranians and Afghans as Indo-Aryans. You need to read better books :lol:
 
. . .
You call 7-million ONLY?

The population of whole of Sweden few years ago was 9.5-million

Bhai as compared to 15 million it is only na.

Think you need to get your facts right and stop reading indian propaganda on wikipedia.......:disagree:


Origins of the Aryans/Indo-Aryans...:disagree::

https://www.ancient-origins.net/his...y-and-how-were-their-origins-corrupted-009075

Iranians and Afghans are Aryans not Indo-Aryans. Indo-Aryans are the Aryans of the subcontinent from Punjabis in the West to Assamese in the East to the Marathas in the South. Also, the Singhalese of Sri Lanka.
 
.
Looks like India is about to start some blood letting of Kashmiri muslims and to ethenically clean Kashmir of Muslims to "solve" the Kashmir issue. Basically force all Muslims in Indian held Kashmir to move into Pakistan held Kashmir through an ethnic forced migration ...

It didn't cost Myanmar anything in the end interms of sanctions, India most likely thinks it can do the same ...

How can we stop this from happening??
Not a chance.
 
. .
Who knows that we may be witnessing the starting episodes of the nuclear Holocaust in the subcontinent.
 
. .
Looks like India is about to start some blood letting of Kashmiri muslims and to ethenically clean Kashmir of Muslims to "solve" the Kashmir issue. Basically force all Muslims in Indian held Kashmir to move into Pakistan held Kashmir through an ethnic forced migration ...

It didn't cost Myanmar anything in the end interms of sanctions, India most likely thinks it can do the same ...

How can we stop this from happening??
They are planning but they don't know Allah SWT is the best planner.

@Rashid Mahmood @Khafee @Irfan Baloch
 
.
Bhai as compared to 15 million it is only na.



Iranians and Afghans are Aryans not Indo-Aryans. Indo-Aryans are the Aryans of the subcontinent from Punjabis in the West to Assamese in the East to the Marathas in the South. Also, the Singhalese of Sri Lanka.


Indo-Aryan is a linguistic term in that sense. Not a racial term. Indo-Aryan in your version refers to the various indian people's who speak a language that was HEAVILY influenced by people who were RACIALLY Aryan.

You're clueless.



Here's the real Aryans. Indo-Aryan usually means various languages spoken by certain South Asians whose languages was HEAVILY influenced by RACIAL ARYANS:

https://www.ancient-origins.net/his...y-and-how-were-their-origins-corrupted-009075
 
.
Indo-Aryan is a linguistic term in that sense. Not a racial term. Indo-Aryan in your version refers to the various indian people's who speak a language that was HEAVILY influenced by people who were RACIALLY Aryan.





Here's the real Aryans. Indo-Aryan usually means various languages spoken by certain South Asians whose languages was HEAVILY influenced by RACIAL ARYANS:

https://www.ancient-origins.net/his...y-and-how-were-their-origins-corrupted-009075


Disagree. your source also nowhere says who the real Aryans were. It says that they came originally from Iran but spread over the whole of North India over time.

Anyway, Let's leave this discussion for another time. This is off-topic.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom