it was shown on tv about 8 years ago and if you think the plight of the south chinese tiger is real you must see that all were culprits i would have believed you if chinese history was not so bloody
Please provide a source instead of what you say so, which general and where it happened.
how can i provide a source to a tv record which was 8 years ago
If you just claim something based on what you say so without any reliable source to back up your claim, the discussion becomes meaningless, some guys may claim they are the god if it works that way.
oh my god the plight of south chinese tigers is real or not were there tigers in hong kong now there are not nationalism to this extent is a curse it was a documentary for wildlife the conservationist even met the chinese official but they couldnt do anything regarding the army.
Why changed the topic? South China tigers are because of human fault, just like many other extinct tiger sub species, it's a known fact. I never denied. please stay on the topic and prove what you claimed.
okay you claimed human fault the general was a robot and the people that got him the fur by killing the tigers were also robots. if you think something like that never happened then i m sorry you are living in a fools paradise
I m just asking who is the general that you claimed? such a simple question.
i remember his face though not his name
You don't expect me to believe something just because you say so, do you?
definitely but i do expect from you to acknowledge the probability that this incident may have happened 1.2 billion people south chinese tigers extent in the wild, chinese soft side for tiger medicine yes i dont have the proof of the tv channel source but if you dont believe one of the poachers had no connection to an army man negating the concept due to maybe the army general holding the moral high ground making the assumption utterly baseless knowing that atheism is the predominant face of chinese people reducing the chance of a buddhist type of benevolence toward the animal
Don't try to switch the topic, I only questioned your claim that a Chinese general had a Siberian tiger killed for its fur, not other things and you consistently failed to provide any proof except for you say so.
he got the fur he didnt kill it he benefited from it as the show portrayed
Who? Where did it happen and when? I m not here to listen to a fish wives' tale.
