What's new

Why the Indian Establishment, Modi, and BJP hate and fear Imran Khan!

.
Yes, agreed, everyone is worries, one follow to other and list go on..
unki full civilization is mostly far east coast based

j8s4hcolof571.jpg
 
.
The same reason why the Pakistani military and PDM hates Imran Khan. He wants to look enemies in the eyes and do things as they should be done.

Notice how Indians are dancing around lately since PDM took power. The Indians are literally celebrating every day as a victory. Did they do the same thing when Imran Khan was in power?
This is black box analysis not knowing all the facts: There may be a blind men and elephant problem of different interpretations going on here. From Indians perspective, the political parties may not matter. What they may be noticing is that Pakistan has notably degraded in all respects in the last year and hence poses lesser security threat than before. It is this aspect of Pakistan's collapse that may be being misunderstood as a preference for one party over another.
 
.
Answer is easy, IK bashed the Butcher at every chance internationally and world leaders listened to him. He brought up the plight of Kashmiris over and over something most Pakistani leaders dont do as too busy building pizza empires or money laundering.
 
. .
removed by his/your own fauj

and later likely also shot at by a patsy of Pk fauj

ghanta logic, purely feels driven guy, was Mr Khan.. could have done his socialist thing "uplift the poor" blahblah and probably have lived out his term

in the end khud ki establishment + political allies and opponents all kicked him out

images
Once again, you have no idea what you're talking about. His ouster had to do with him trying to fix the system that by targeting corruption. He was removed because the powers that be benefit from that corruption.

I suggest you stop talking, because you have no idea what you're talking about.
 
.
His ouster had to do with him trying to fix the system that by targeting corruption
Bajwa was on "one page" with Niazi Sahab as long as we was going after corruption of other politicians. The trouble really started after he refused to allow Gen Faiz to be posted out of the ISI despite multiple reminders by Bajwa because IK needed Faiz in charge of the ISI to fix his political opponents just like he had rigged the last election in PTI's favour.
 
. . .
Once again, you have no idea what you're talking about. His ouster had to do with him trying to fix the system that by targeting corruption. He was removed because the powers that be benefit from that corruption.

I suggest you stop talking, because you have no idea what you're talking about.
oh you idealists

will you ever learn ?

or will you never learn ?

much palpable, your butthurt (sorry) .. we hear you hiss

great game vs India far from lost but.. Noora lot and the new gernails will be a handful as always

India is neither celebrating, nor letting it's guard down

we respect Pak fauj, a much worthy adversary, your internal political turmoil notwithstanding
 
.
Clever to use all possible keywords to attract maximum viewership. The Pir Zadda is fighting inflation in his own ways.
i remember few months ago major gurav arya requesting indians to give donations to ik so he can ignite anarchy in Pakistan. Ik received foreign funding from indians along with israeli zionists as proved by their documents submitted in election commission.He sold kashmir to indians . In reality all criticism of indians on ik is apparent to disguise and fool our intelligence agencies and public
 
. .
Firstly, Modi and Vajpayee are very different. Vajpayee was a bit of a idealistic dreamer who saw himself as a liberal Hindu. While their political beliefs were different, he was personally someone in the mould of Nehru. Modi is a hard headed pragmatist.

Secondly, after Mushy did Kargil behind India's and Mian Sahab 's back, the Indian establishment knows that just the Prime Minister of Pakistan does not have the authority to negotiate peace with India and any concessions India makes will be exploited by non -state actors and the Pakistani establishment will claim ignorance or inability to control them. Basically, there is very little confidence in the Pakistani establishment's willingness and/or ability to deliver on a peace deal. Because of what happened after Vajpayee's bus ride to Lahore, the Indian public is also not too enthusiastic about making concessions about a peace deal, even though they will appreciate the peace dividend. The bottom line is that after the Kargil episode, the peace constituency in India has been significantly marginalized and if Pakistan wants normalisation of relations, it would pretty much have to be on India's terms because India doesn't mind the status quo continuing.

You Indians conveniently forget that after doing 1971, you launched the Siachen Glacier war in 1984-- just when Pakistan was already facing a threat in Afghanistan due to the Soviet invasion there; talk about 'stabbing in one's back!'. So it was India which broke the longest peace time between the two countries and then it was India which screwed up the Indian Occupied Kashmir (IoK) elections/politics in mid 1980s which gave rise to a violent insurgency which has killed tens of thousands of innocent Kashmiris and that is even now barely suppressed due to the heavy presence of Indian troops there.
I don't approve of Musharraf's Kargil operation but that's mainly because it was futile but I can understand his anger over India when India had launched the Siachen War.
Some introspection would do Indians some good!
 
.
You Indians conveniently forget that after doing 1971, you launched the Siachen Glacier war in 1984-- just when Pakistan was already facing a threat in Afghanistan due to the Soviet invasion there; talk about 'stabbing in one's back!'. So it was India which broke the longest peace time between the two countries and then it was India which screwed up the Indian Occupied Kashmir (IoK) elections/politics in mid 1980s which gave rise to a violent insurgency which has killed tens of thousands of innocent Kashmiris and that is even now barely suppressed due to the heavy presence of Indian troops there.
I don't approve of Musharraf's Kargil operation but that's mainly because it was futile but I can understand his anger over India when India had launched the Siachen War.
Some introspection would do Indians some good!
Don't play victim card. Sir ji

You talked about 1984, but forgot that India fought a war in 1962, and Pakistan wanted to take the advantage in 1965 but failed.

You mentioned Kashmir election in 1980s but forgot to mention about armed training camps in Pakistan which caused many Kashmir people murdered in Kashmir including Hindu pandit. it was fully armed support was continued until agreement with mushy 2004,2005, and now still partially continue.

Kargil war - nothing to say about it. just a stupid blunder
 
Last edited:
.
My 2 paises on this subject. Indian establishment does not fear IK. Indian establishment dislikes upstarts. They don't dislike just Pakistani upstarts, they dislike Indians ones too, like Arvind Kejriwal. And when I say establishment, I don't mean just the current regime. I mean the entire political system, the old guard who want the nation to worship geriatric men who have done politics for 50 years plus. The system has told us for decades that age needs to be respected. If you are old and celibate, even better. Wear Khadi, get 2 more brownie points. Talk vague, done to death niceties, get one more brownie point. This system will never tolerate anyone who talks direct, is energetic, irreverent and has no dirty secrets.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom