Again silly claim, I guess you like getting humiliated again and again, Please do some research before posting crap
Everyone knows who remained a slave to rules from east or west,
here is a myth buster for you, time lines of the rulers of Pakistan
Now if you look at the history of the land called Pakistan (rulers of land)
Mauryas, pre Ashoka (~300 BC ,
Ruler Origin : Bihar India,
Religion of Pakistani Lands : Hinduism)
Mauryas, Post Ashoka (~260 BC,
Ruler Origin : Bihar India,
Religion of Pakistani Lands : Buddhism)
Indo/ Greek Kingdom (~150 BC,
Ruler Origin : Central Asia,
Religion of Pakistani Lands : Buddhism/ Hinduism/ Zoroastrianism)
Indo/ Scythians (~55 BC,
Ruler Origin : Central Asia,
Religion of Pakistani Lands : Buddhism/ Hinduism/ Zoroastrianism)
Kushans (~50-300 AD,
Ruler Origin : Afgan/ Cuntral Asia,
Religion of Pakistani Lands : Buddhism)
Huns (~350 AD,
Ruler Origin : Central Asia,
Religion of Pakistani Lands : Buddhism)
Guptas (~400 AD,
Ruler Origin : Bihar India,
Religion of Pakistani Lands : Hinduism)
Huns (~500 AD,
Ruler Origin : Central Asia,
Religion of Pakistani Lands : Buddhism/ Hinduism
Gazanivids (~1000 AD,
Ruler Origin : Turk,
Religion of Pakistani Lands : Islam/ Hinduism)
Ghaurids (~1200 AD,
Ruler Origin : Persian,
Religion of Pakistani Lands : Islam/ Hinduism)
Delhi Sultanate(~1200-1450 AD,
Ruler Origin : Turkic,
Religion of Pakistani Lands : Islam/ Hinduism)
Moughls (~1500 AD,
Ruler Origin : Central Asia ,
Religion of Pakistani Lands : Islam/ Hinduism)
Durrani and Sikh Empires (~1700 AD,
Ruler Origin : Sikhs (India), Durranis (Afgans) ,
Religion of Pakistani Lands : Hinduism/ Sikhism / Islam)
British (~1850 AD,
Ruler Origin : Europeans ,
Religion of Pakistani Lands : Hinduism/ Sikhism / Islam)
Pakistanis ( After 1947 AD,
Ruler Origin : Pakistani ,
Religion of Pakistani Lands : Islam)
People of the land call Pakistan adopted whatever was imposed by foreign invaders in last 2000 years,
Only time when Pakistanis ruled Pakistan Lands happened after independence (1947)
Hahaha, what stupid crap.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3163234
"The study showed that the Muslim Gujjars differ significantly from their counterpart, the Hindu Gujjars"
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19809480
"Overall, our results support a model according to which the spread of Islam in India was predominantly cultural conversion associated with minor but still detectable levels of gene flow from outside, primarily from Iran and Central Asia"
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20067368
"we observed a certain degree of genetic contribution from Iran to both Muslim populations"
https://www.nature.com/articles/ejhg2009168
"Altogether, haplogroups restricted to the Indian Subcontinent were observed at an average frequency of 63% in Indian Muslim populations as compared with 74% among the non-Muslim neighbors The average contribution of haplogroups of West Eurasian origin to Indian Muslims was 18%, which is not significantly higher than the value observed in non-Muslim populations (14%). "
"The sub-Saharan African- and Arabian-specific paternal lineages E1b1b1a and J*(xJ2) were present in three Muslim populations (Indian Shia, Indian Sunni and Mappla) with an average frequency of 2 and 8%, respectively, whereas they were rare or absent among non-Muslim populations. Haplogroup G, which is common in the Middle East and rare or absent in Indian non-Muslim populations, was also present in three Muslim populations with an average overall frequency of 5%."
Many of the the major foreign conquerors prior to Islam settled within Pakistan and influenced our gene pool significantly, this includes the Greeks, Kushans, Hephtalites, Scythians, Parthians, etc. This is displayed by our significantly higher levels of Eurasian DNA as compared to you guys (see previous picture for proof). Many tribes are also said to be descended from these groups, such as the Kalash, Burusho, Gujjars, Durranis, Jats, etc.
As for the Muslim conquerors, again, they have also quite clearly influenced the gene pool of Muslims in the region. What's more, their cultural influence has been immense, we eat their food, wear their clothes, speak their language, etc.
To put the final nail in the coffin, let's go through those empires you listed:
Mauryans - Kautilya came from Taxila and Chandragupta Maurya also studied there. The empire had many soldiers from modern day Pakistan, and the empire started in Pakistan. The Mauryans also had KPK ancestry (their name comes form the Mor clan of ancient KPK).
Gupta's - Came from Bangladesh, they aren't Hindustani.
Greeks, Scythians, Huns, Kushans - Their major cities were based in Pakistan (most notably Peshawar and Taxila, among others), and we are descended from them as explained earlier. Not to mention Huns, Kushans and Scythians were mostly Iranic confederations, this is the same racial classification as Pashtuns and Baluchis, and many Pakistanis have ancestry or belong to these ethnic groups (I've got partial Baluchi ancestry).
Ghaznavids and Ghurids - Lahore was their winter capital and 2nd largest city, they also had many Punjabis and Pashtuns fight in their military and work in their administration, and we are also descended from them as explained earlier. Also, KPK/FATA and Baluchistan were historically considered part of Afghanistan, and Baluchis/Pashtuns are Iranic people just like the Ghurids.
Delhi Sultanate - We are descended from the Muslim conquerors who came to the region. Also, the Khilijis were Pashtuns (they are still to this day a major Pashtun tribal confederacy), the Tughlaqs came from the Punjab and intermarried with ethnic Punjabis, and the Lodi's were Pashtuns from the Punjab who intermarried with ethnic Punjabis. The Delhi Sultanate also invented Urdu. The Delhi Sultanate also came to Pakistan before Hindustan.
Mughals - They had assimilated into local culture almost immediately, and intermarried frequently with local Rajputs. Lahore was also a major city of their empire with more Mughal monuments than Delhi, and Shah Jahan and Akbar came from modern day Pakistan. We eat their food and wear their clothes, Urdu matured under their empire and was the language they spoke (along with Farsi), we are also descended from them. The Mughals were also in Pakistan before they entered Hindustan.
Durranis - They were Pashtuns, and KPK/FATA along with Baluchistan were historically associated with Afghanistan. Abdali was also born in Multan, and Peshawar was a major city of the empire. The Durranis are also a major Pashtun tribal confederation in Pakistan.
Sikhs - They were Punjabi, and came from modern day Pakistan.
To sum up: We are a mixed people, descended from many foreigners who came to our lands and assimilated into our fold, but the ones we most identify with are the Islamic conquerors since they are the reason our nation exists today, and were ideologically the most similar to us.
Which we ? Arab? Mongol ? Turk or Iranian? . Matter of fact will be always be that you are none no matter how hard you cry.
See previous post you dumb ape.
Also, by we I meant Muslims. As a close minded Hindustani who will not accept anyone from outside his country (to the point of denying the Indo-Aryan migration) and who's mind revolves around race whilst simultaneously not following an ideology that extends beyond his own borders (Dharma), I wouldn't expect you to understand why Muslims consider Muslims of other ethnic groups as one of their own.
