Trisonics
BANNED
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2009
- Messages
- 1,997
- Reaction score
- -13
Why Pakistan will never acknowledge the surgical strikes from India?
Reason 1: After all the statements of bravado like "we will give a befitting response", super duper shows of aircrafts taking off from highways, they have been left speechless. Their preparedness will be questioned.
Reason 2: IF they admit, they have to respond. Their is no element of surprise left, Indian military is already expecting a response. If the loses are high in the eventuality that they respond, it's another major setback.
Reason 3: Unknown to us all, important nations may be tightening their grip on Pakistan not to escalate.
Reason 4: Admitting to the response also means admitting to the terror camps within it's own territory, it's state policy of terrorism.
Reason 5: Admitting would mean the rest of the world believing what India says about the so called uprising in Kashmir is funded and Pakistani terrorists causing all the trouble
Reason 6: Conventionally, India is stronger militarily. While Pakistan can cause damage, it can never sustain against the might of India's force.
Reason 7: Baluchistan has beeped up on the radar much to their discomfort, can any escalation lead to the unrest being taken advantage off?
Reason 8: CPEC. Escalations, small war would mean Pakistan will undo whatever economic gains it has seen, will China and other nations see CPEC as safe?
Reason 9: India has more influence in Afghaniztan, Iran and Bangladesh. Can India incite trouble from these areas if there was any escalation?
Reason 10: With US and India signing a pact on sharing military logistics China will distance itself from any situation involving Indo-Pak war actions. Is China in Pakistan's plan for any retaliation it plans against India?
Lastly, India has officially announced that it did carry Surgical Strikes. They have no reason to provide evidence. It is Pakistan's so called territory that was intruded so the onus is on them to provide evidence that it never happened. India does not need to prove anything to anybody...it was area under Pakistan's control that was intruded so it will stick to that story.
The above are my opinions so there is absolutely no need to troll. Agree, disagree of plain agree to disagree.
TY
Reason 1: After all the statements of bravado like "we will give a befitting response", super duper shows of aircrafts taking off from highways, they have been left speechless. Their preparedness will be questioned.
Reason 2: IF they admit, they have to respond. Their is no element of surprise left, Indian military is already expecting a response. If the loses are high in the eventuality that they respond, it's another major setback.
Reason 3: Unknown to us all, important nations may be tightening their grip on Pakistan not to escalate.
Reason 4: Admitting to the response also means admitting to the terror camps within it's own territory, it's state policy of terrorism.
Reason 5: Admitting would mean the rest of the world believing what India says about the so called uprising in Kashmir is funded and Pakistani terrorists causing all the trouble
Reason 6: Conventionally, India is stronger militarily. While Pakistan can cause damage, it can never sustain against the might of India's force.
Reason 7: Baluchistan has beeped up on the radar much to their discomfort, can any escalation lead to the unrest being taken advantage off?
Reason 8: CPEC. Escalations, small war would mean Pakistan will undo whatever economic gains it has seen, will China and other nations see CPEC as safe?
Reason 9: India has more influence in Afghaniztan, Iran and Bangladesh. Can India incite trouble from these areas if there was any escalation?
Reason 10: With US and India signing a pact on sharing military logistics China will distance itself from any situation involving Indo-Pak war actions. Is China in Pakistan's plan for any retaliation it plans against India?
Lastly, India has officially announced that it did carry Surgical Strikes. They have no reason to provide evidence. It is Pakistan's so called territory that was intruded so the onus is on them to provide evidence that it never happened. India does not need to prove anything to anybody...it was area under Pakistan's control that was intruded so it will stick to that story.
The above are my opinions so there is absolutely no need to troll. Agree, disagree of plain agree to disagree.
TY