What's new

Why is Chahbahar not burning?

Status
Not open for further replies.
. . .
Because of huge Chinese investment and also somewhat due to sanctions on Iran
You partly answered your own question.

Iran cannot stand up to the West. Iran is a pariah state.

Who will invest in Chabahar port? It is a joke.

Don't compare Chabahar to Gwadar. Gwadar is way ahead of schedule compared to Chabahar port.

The Chinese prefers working with Pakistanis over Iranians for a variety of reasons.
 
.
We should create dangerous predicament in ME by staking bigger share of the cake we need oil fields hence create progroms in iraq and invade with arab coalition grab the oil and make deals with US to transfer the OIL fields in east of euphrates to Pakistan army..

Nobody could do anything but complain....
View attachment 812861

The world is dog eat dog we need oil fields and to further enhance our economy.. We have military might which means we can take what we want
Puff puff pass bro, can you pass me the blunt already 😂
 
.
nothing but incoherent babble mainly in that video but one needs objectivity, not unflinching devotion to realize that. I feel we are detracting from the subject matter of the post.

Perhaps it's way high from your level of understanding. Anyway, bottom line is, zia never backed off in taking the fight to the enemies soil, something embarrassingly disappeared in Pakistan response to sponsorship of terrorism.
 
.
Perhaps it's way high from your level of understanding. Anyway, bottom line is, zia never backed off in taking the fight to the enemies soil, something embarrassingly disappeared in Pakistan response to sponsorship of terrorism.
Chabahar port is a joke compared to Gwadar.

I dare India to invest in Chabahar port. USA will be pissed with India.

Iran is a pariah state.
 
.
Zia halted the operation in Baluchistan otherwise Bhutto had totally crushed them forever. That operation started from two sides of the border, Iran, and Pakistan. But, Zia stopped to gain political mileage. Now sons of the same elements are acting against the stae. The operation was started in 73 and Zia stopped in 78 and in 79 went to Afghanistan.


Zia managed it with politics. Did you had balochistan problem in his time, or say a decade after we he was assassinated?

Balochistan was a settled issue, it only was reignited, artificially, when our liberal stupid generals and establishment, allowed all the enemies of Pakistan gather inside Afghanistan and use it as base to launch this terrorist campaign. Another stupidity, which is still ongoing, is not to confront Iran over its involvement in Baluchistan. Zia never shy away in telling these Persian Mullahs their place.

It's an intellectual dishonesty from you if you putting the incompentecy of those who followed Zia into his account.
 
.
Zia managed it with politics. Did you had balochistan problem in his time, or say a decade after we he was assassinated?

Balochistan was a settled issue, it only was reignited, artificially, when our liberal stupid generals and establishment, allowed all the enemies of Pakistan gather inside Afghanistan and use it as base to launch this terrorist campaign. Another stupidity, which is still ongoing, is not to confront Iran over its involvement in Baluchistan. Zia never shy away in telling these Persian Mullahs their place.

It's an intellectual dishonesty from you if you putting the incompentecy of those who followed Zia into his account.
General Zia ul Haq was one of the better times for Pakistan. That is what my old parents told me in my younger years.
 
.
General Zia ul Haq was one of the better times for Pakistan. That is what my old parents told me in my younger years.
Strategically and culturally it was the best time in Pakistan's history.
 
.
Chabahar port is a joke compared to Gwadar.

I dare India to invest in Chabahar port. USA will be pissed with India.

Iran is a pariah state.

You are highly mistaken here.

Chahbahar has got full backing of yanks. They are supportive of India using chahbahar. These fkers can go to any lenght in their hatred to Pakistan, even if it means directly working with Iran.
 
.
You are highly mistaken here.

Chahbahar has got full backing of yanks. They are supportive of India using chahbahar. These fkers can go to any lenght in their hatred to Pakistan, even if it means directly working with Iran.

Iran is an enemy of USA. And of course USA does not want to upset the delicate balance of power in the Middle East of Sunni Saudi Arabia versus Shia Iran.
Saudi Arabia and Iran support proxies in the Middle East against each other.


Technically you are correct, USA will never take out Iran, because Sunnis would be secretly happy in Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan.

You are highly mistaken here.

Chahbahar has got full backing of yanks. They are supportive of India using chahbahar. These fkers can go to any lenght in their hatred to Pakistan, even if it means directly working with Iran.
Usually I talk pro-China, and will continue to do so.
The Yanks you speak of have double-crossed us with the Pressler Amendment, when we got nuclear weapons.
I am happy that Pakistan is getting J-10Cs from China.

No more F-16s and good riddance. Better to work with China in Joint Ventures and Transfer of Technology.
 
Last edited:
.
General Zia ul Haq was one of the better times for Pakistan. That is what my old parents told me in my younger years.


You dont have to take my words, but I have lived in Zia's Pakistan, infact all of it.

When he was assinated (with the help from within) I have seen elders in my family cry.

There is a reason, that all hard core Patriots with Pakistaniyant, who are above petty sect, ethnic , regional affiliations, to this day, love him.
 
.
It's called common sense and responsible behaviour. Look at all those nations who went on a war binge and look how bankrupt they have become.

Sorry what do you mean? Are you referring to 80k plus Pakistani dead in enemy nations having fun with us, bringing war deep inside our borders? Which ofcourse have screwed up our economy.
 
.
Perhaps it's way high from your level of understanding. Anyway, bottom line is, zia never backed off in taking the fight to the enemies soil, something embarrassingly disappeared in Pakistan response to sponsorship of terrorism.
I do not have unflinching devotion for him, so yeah, viewed from an objective lens, maybe it would be WaY hIgHeR tHaN mY uNdErStAnDiNg. As I said before, do not detract from the discussion whose scope is confined.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom