What's new

Why investing to India is dangerous? See the little trick behind India's apps ban.

kankan326

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jun 7, 2011
Messages
5,217
Reaction score
-13
Country
China
Location
China
ByteDance invested billions of dollars in India. It bought equipment, trained local workers and engineers to know how to run and maintain the business. Spent huge amount of money on advertisement. Finally ByteDance created a new but mature, booming business in India and was about to make money. The ban came. All the money and work vaporized. Vaporized for ByteDance, but not for India. Because the whole business created by ByteDance, equipment, workers, millions users, were delivered to Indian companies. Actually ByteDance was robbed by India.

Some said the Chinese apps ban was caused by China-India tension. No. This is premeditated robbery. Indian government just used this perfect timing to commit it. Otherwise Indian government would be facing pressure from both inside and outside.

Banning Chinese apps is just first step. Because for apps, once the markets have been explored, it's easy to take over. India has not banned other Chinese products because so far their domestic suppliers are far behind. I believe in the future if there is an Indian domestic phone brand that is similarly competitive to Xiaomi Vivo or other Chinese brands, Indian government would immediately kick the Chinese phones out.

This kind of taking advantage from others perfectly matches Indians way of thinking. Everyone who has experience doing business with Indians is familiar to that.

Americans should not laugh now. American apps will not be 100% safe in India.
 
Last edited:
.
Indians tend to be inherently scammers. They have very low sets of moral standards and ethics,and driven by a primitive impulse to scam ,rape & loot.
If I was a foreign investor ,I'd only buy stakes in Indian company at most,but never expand RnD,expertise,and train local workforce.
Never invest with long term goal in India.
India's most successful two wheeler firm is Hero corp,it was launched with the help of japanese Honda group under the brand called herohonda.
But once Indian firms procured the knowhow,they tore up the partnership and formed Hero corp ,using all the skills and manufacturing tech learned from the Japanese.
Indians already made some copied versions of TIKTOK in India .
Chinese manufacturers that are planning to 100% produce parts of mobile like xiaomi in India better be prepared ,if I was a foreign manufacturer,I 'd make it mandatory to only assemble in countries like INDIA .
 
Last edited:
. . . .
And what about the Pakistani political and economic system ?

Pakistan is an Islamic Republic while Britain is not.

ByteDance invested billions of dollars in India. It bought equipment, trained local workers and engineers to know how to run and maintain the business. Spent huge amount of money on advertisement. Finally ByteDance created a new but mature, booming business in India and was about to make money. The ban came. All the money and work vaporized. Vaporized for ByteDance, but not for India. Because the whole business created by ByteDance, equipment, workers, millions users, were delivered to Indian companies. Actually ByteDance was robbed by India.

Some said the Chinese apps ban was caused by China-India tension. No. This is premeditated robbery. Indian government just used this perfect timing to commit it. Otherwise Indian government would be facing pressure from both inside and outside.

Banning Chinese apps is just first step. Because for apps, once the markets have been explored, it's easy to take over. India has not banned other Chinese products because so far their domestic suppliers are far behind. I believe in the future if there is an Indian domestic phone brand that is similarly competitive to Xiaomi Vivo or other Chinese brands, Indian government would immediately kick the Chinese phones out.

This kind of taking advantage from others perfectly matches Indians way of thinking. Everyone who has experience doing business with Indians is familiar to that.

Americans should not laugh now. American apps will not be 100% safe in India.

Indians are robbers. China should not invest a single yuan in India going forward.
 
.
Pakistan is an Islamic Republic while Britain is not.

Except for the name the rest is based on the British system called Parliamentary Democracy with the President's position added.
 
.
Did you check Instagram reel? :lol:
But Most of chinese investment in Bigbasket, PayTM, zomato, swiggy etc is in danger cuz other VC firms are giving exit options to chinese firms :undecided:
 
.
Except for the name the rest is based on the British system called Parliamentary Democracy with the President's position added.

What do you mean by name? Pakistan does not run a sham called secularism.

Also, Pakistan does not have queen as the head of the state.

Did you check Instagram reel? :lol:
But Most of chinese investment in Bigbasket, PayTM, zomato, swiggy etc is in danger cuz other VC firms are giving exit options to chinese firms :undecided:

Chinese firms will leave India completely. Less FDI for India going forward. :smitten::yahoo::chilli:
 
.
Chinese firms will leave India completely. Less FDI for India going forward. :smitten::yahoo::chilli:

aree bhai it means, Accel, greylock, sequoia etc are pushing Tencent, Ant Financial etc to exit.
In a way Startups will not welcome term sheet from china based firms.
 
.
What do you mean by name? Pakistan does not run a sham called secularism.

I will list the types of governance systems I know :

1. Pure monarchy.

2. Theocracy.

3. One party system.

4. Two party parliamentary democracy.

5. Multi-party parliamentary democracy.

6. Constitutional monarchy.

7. Direct democracy.

8. Direct democracy socialism.

You tell me which is Pakistan's system.
 
.
I will list the types of governance systems I know :

1. Pure monarchy.

2. Theocracy.

3. One party system.

4. Two party parliamentary democracy.

5. Multi-party parliamentary democracy.

6. Constitutional monarchy.

7. Direct democracy.

8. Direct democracy socialism.

You tell me which is Pakistan's system.

Pakistan is a theocratic state. It is ruled by Sharia.
 
.
Except for the name the rest is based on the British system called Parliamentary Democracy with the President's position added.
Pakistan is an Islamic Republic where the constitution has influence of sharia. Only a Muslim can become president or prime minister. Is British the same? I didn't knew that one.

Furthermore, history shows that Pakistan performed better under president rule (military rule) to be specific. This is relevant because almost half of the time we had this system vs the other.
 
.
Pakistan is an Islamic Republic where the constitution has influence of sharia. Only a Muslim can become president or prime minister. Is British the same? I didn't knew that one.

Firstly, I hope you are not taking the underlined with pride. Even Lebanon has a more progressive system than Pakistan :
Lebanon is a parliamentary democratic republic within the overall framework of confessionalism, a form of consociationalism in which the highest offices are proportionately reserved for representatives from certain religious communities. The constitution grants the people the right to change their government.


Secondly, the so-called Sharia laws brought in by Zia ul Haq seem to focus on sexual relations and not on socio-economic injustices like feudalism and disparity in income. These laws certainly were not brought in to create a true Islamic welfare state.

Thirdly, removing the part about "Islamic republic" the remainder of the political arrangement is based on the British system.

Furthermore, history shows that Pakistan performed better under president rule (military rule) to be specific. This is relevant because almost half of the time we had this system vs the other.

You will know that ( I know only in sketches ) that the coup attempt of 1951, the so-called Rawalpindi Conspiracy, was set up to bring to government a combination of the military and the Communist Party of Pakistan. If the coup had been successful South Asia would have resembled a different place.
 
.
China is not narrow minded like India. Business is business and politics is another thing.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom