HariPrasad
BANNED
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2013
- Messages
- 14,055
- Reaction score
- -22
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
J-31 or now PAK FC-31P Stealth Fighter which Pakistan is buying....has given Pakistan and China STRATEGIC Advantage over the region, It has given an upper hand and true multi-role capabilities, it is still under development and a lot will come out as PAF has become part of the PAK FC-31 P project in its formative years.
IAF is in disarray...LoL
J-31 or now PAK FC-31P Stealth Fighter which Pakistan is buying....has given Pakistan and China STRATEGIC Advantage over the region, It has given an upper hand and true multi-role capabilities, it is still under development and a lot will come out as PAF has become part of the PAK FC-31 P project in its formative years.
IAF is in disarray...LoL
To write this article prove Indian really concern with China j31 in service of Pakistan Air Force. This j31 still not in mass production and Indian already wrote this article to dismiss the potential of j31 operating in PAF in the future won't provide PAF air superiority over Pakistan air space.
What makes you think it will?
National MST Radar Facility in Gadankiwell thats why i have stated in other thread india should develop ground based VHF radar to counter VLO platforms
even if PAF buys or not but Chinese air force would be having J20 for sure
so it's would be wise to invest on those Radar systems as Chinese /Russian are already developed such systems
CHEERS
You should respond to the article. Premature to write such an article since j31 still in development phase. Still a long way for Pakistan economy future grow, maybe by the time j31 mass production Pakistan will have enough money to buy j31 in the future.
My question to you is simple. State the reason in you believing so. Assuming something cannot be considered logical.
The article written base on the assumption of what will happen in 8 yrs from now. Since you mention illogical to assume, you are in agreement with over this article premature in his analysis.
It may be an assumption but atleast they have explained why they assume so.. You have not done that.