Hamartia Antidote
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2013
- Messages
- 35,188
- Reaction score
- 30
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Skyscrapers have more disadvantages though, be it safety, traffic, infrastructure, efficiency.Basically, there are way too many stalled for many years, and failed skyscraper projects all around the country.
The central government then concludes: "we suck at building skyscrapers, thus, we shouldn't even try"
Skyscrapers are the future! They are not trying hard enough!Skyscrapers have more disadvantages though, be it safety, traffic, infrastructure, efficiency.
You can barely find skyscrapers above 250m in Europe for those reasons.
A Chinese member posted how US lost the skyscraper race to China. But you are saying Chinese are not good at building skyscrapers. One of you is lying.Basically, there are way too many stalled for many years, and failed skyscraper projects all around the country.
The central government then concludes: "we suck at building skyscrapers, thus, we shouldn't even try"
I claim the otherwise, Skyscrapers wont be that popular in the future anymore, at least not the super tall ones just because the cost efficiency argument alone.Skyscrapers are the future! They are not trying hard enough!
Skyscrapers are necessary when you need to build cities. Chinese are not a few millions of them but more than a billion. Look at New York City, just under 800 sqkm, it has a GDP of $1.5 trillion.I claim the otherwise, Skyscrapers wont be that popular in the future anymore, at least not the super tall ones just because the cost efficiency argument alone.
I wouldn't want to live in apartment buildings let alone skyscrapers. You have no garden, no outdoor space of your own.
European cities have the highest GDP per population/size without skyscrapers and also top the list of life quality too which is just as important.Skyscrapers are necessary when you need to build cities. Chinese are not a few millions of them but more than a billion. Look at New York City, just under 800 sqkm, it has a GDP of $1.5 trillion.
Then, buy a mansion apartment of 1000m², and make a backyard in it.I wouldn't want to live in apartment buildings let alone skyscrapers. You have no garden, no outdoor space of your own.
Skyscrapers raise nations prestige. The more you have it, the more prestige. Nothing raises one's prestige more than a giant phallic symbol, and a status statement towering above all othersI claim the otherwise, Skyscrapers wont be that popular in the future anymore, at least not the super tall ones just because the cost efficiency argument alone.
Lack of logic.European cities have the highest GDP per population/size without skyscrapers and also top the list of life quality too which is just as important.
You just summerised the Gulf mentality, who needs education, science and working justice system as long as you have skyscrapers.Then, buy a mansion apartment of 1000m², and make a backyard in it.
Skyscrapers raise nations prestige. The more you have it, the more prestige. Nothing raises one's prestige more than a giant phallic symbol, and a status statement towering above all others
And you call this logic?Lack of logic.
the reason that European is rich is they have industrialized much earlier than other parts of the world, and colonized other parts of the world to plunder resources.