What's new

Who Would Win In A Saudi Arabia vs. Iran Showdown?

The SC

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Feb 13, 2012
Messages
32,233
Reaction score
21
Country
Canada
Location
Canada
Opinion
Who Would Win In A Saudi Arabia vs. Iran Showdown?

With the growing tensions in the Persian Gulf after the Saudi embassy in Tehran was stormed and set on fire in the wake of Saudi Arabia’s execution of a Shia cleric, Americans ought to take notice. Five of the top seven oil producing nations are in the region of the Persian Gulf. So, even though fracking has helped increase American oil reserves to a 42-year high, things could get rocky if Iran and Saudi Arabia go to war.

How bad could it get? Well, keep in mind, in the Iran-Iraq War back in the 1980s, oil tankers became targets. The United States Navy ended up escorting neutral tankers in the Persian Gulf, and two frigates, the Stark (FFG 31) and the Samuel B. Roberts (FFG 58) were damaged. American forces also got into a few engagements with the Iranians. So, what might happen if the Saudis and Iranians end up in a fight? It has happened before.

On June 5, 1984, Iranian F-4 Phantoms threatened Saudi oil fields. The Saudis scrambled F-15s to engage the Iranian planes, and downed two of them using AIM-7 Sparrow missiles. That was over 30 years ago – but the Saudis had the technological edge then, and that edge has only grown. Today, the backbone of the Saudi Air Force consist of variants of the F-15E, while Iran’s best planes are less than 30 MiG-29 Fulcrums. The Saudis, though, have been bringing the Eurofighter Typhoon into service – and have at least two squadrons in service, with more on the way.

Iran has 44 F-14 Tomcats, but these planes have been without technical support from the United States since the fall of the Shah in 1979. Most of the rest of Iran’s air force are aging F-4 Phantoms and F-5E Tigers. While Iran probably has had an easier time getting spare parts for these planes due to their widespread use across the world, these planes are still old, while the Saudis have been getting much newer jets. The Saudis have also seen combat.


If a fight breaks out, expect the Saudis to get control of the air pretty quickly. The good news is that it will also mean that Iranian surface units could also be swept from the Persian Gulf by Saudi Arabia’s air power and the Royal Saudi Navy. But that doesn’t cover the entire naval balance. The Iranian submarine force, including three Kilo-class subs and one 1200-ton Besat-class submarine. But in the narrow waters of the Persian Gulf, Iran could also deploy over two dozen smaller submarines, mostly under 600 tons displacement, and similar to North Korean designs.

While it might be tempting to disregard the midget submarines, just remember that a North Korean mini-sub about the size of the Ghadir-class minisubs was able to sink a South Korean corvette in 2010 firing a 533mm torpedo. The question then becomes one of whether the Saudis would be able to bottle up the Iranian subs in port, most likely by using mines, or if they would end up having to engage in an anti-submarine warfare (ASW) campaign. ASW is tough in the best of conditions (Winston Churchill famously noted that his only worry in World War II was “the U-boat menace”), but in the shallow waters of the Persian Gulf, it gets much more difficult, as towed-array sonars do not work. Worse, in those waters, American submarines do not have much room to operate. Iran’s subs might be small, but the Persian Gulf is a target-rich environment for them, and the confined environment leaves those targets with very few options in terms of sailing routes.

Saudi Arabia is reportedly looking to buy submarines from Germany, probably the Type 212 or 214, but those subs will be years away when they are ordered. Now that Saudi Arabia finds itself facing a conflict with Iran, it may well find that a naval deficiency could create serious problems.

http://dailycaller.com/2016/01/05/who-would-win-in-a-saudi-arabia-vs-iran-showdown/
 
.
They both will loose, and only their enemy will win.
Moreover the results may similar to Iraq-Iran war, like both exhausted but still alive, followed by brutal embargoes on any one, thus killing one. And most probably that "one" will be Saudia. After that, may be next will be Iran-Pakistan or may be Iran-Turkey.
 
Last edited:
.
It is quite surprising that KSA and GCC do not have submarines.. my guess is that they are waiting for the South Korean advanced midget Submarine and some bigger French or German ones, forget the Germans for now, relations are not that good even for machine guns, and not to forget the leopard MBT and the Type 209, 212, 214 negotiations that weren't fruitful, that lives the French Scorpene or the newer French subs Rubis class with conventional propulsion and AIP. Still they might be too big for the mostly shallow waters of the Persian Gulf but not too big for the Arabian sea..
SK also makes the Type 209 and 214 under license and can sell them..
I would like to see interested member's opinions, since this is a gap in capabilities _regardless of Iran_, what would be your thoughts, opinions and suggestions?

HDS-500RTN midget submarine

KSS500A_1.jpg


SK also has this 3000 ton design with 6 to 10 VLS
Bp6hjf6CcAApnG6.jpg


kss-iii.jpg



French DCNS SMX Ocean
j8wocTX.jpg


2l-image.jpg


bknint-20141105041610875-1105_17011_001_04p.jpg




They both will loose, and only their enemy will win.
Moreover the results may similar to Iraq-Iran war, like both exhausted but still alive, followed by brutal embargoes on any one, thus killing one. And most probably that "one" will be Saudia. After that, may be next will be Iran-Pakistan or may be Iran-Turkey.
That is obvious, I think they both know..
 
. .
A stalemate I would guess. Saudis have the technological edge but Iran has a competent air defense system, and also a larger manpower base to defend its soil. There is a reason both are resorting to proxies.
 
.
is that even a question

iran would be a clear winner in any showdown against saudis
 
.
Such a showdown is completely un necessary to begin with... nothing has happened in recent past that would necessiate such war...

Both should grow militarily and both should try to put real islamic values in their society... values of tolerence and justice
 
.
A stalemate I would guess. Saudis have the technological edge but Iran has a competent air defense system, and also a larger manpower base to defend its soil. There is a reason both are resorting to proxies.
if gulf war has taught us any thing it is that the technology triumphs over raw manpower.once saudi have the air superiority its game over for iran.
we should keep in mind saudia also has a standing army of 688,000
 
Last edited:
.
Opinion
Who Would Win In A Saudi Arabia vs. Iran Showdown?

With the growing tensions in the Persian Gulf after the Saudi embassy in Tehran was stormed and set on fire in the wake of Saudi Arabia’s execution of a Shia cleric, Americans ought to take notice. Five of the top seven oil producing nations are in the region of the Persian Gulf. So, even though fracking has helped increase American oil reserves to a 42-year high, things could get rocky if Iran and Saudi Arabia go to war.

How bad could it get? Well, keep in mind, in the Iran-Iraq War back in the 1980s, oil tankers became targets. The United States Navy ended up escorting neutral tankers in the Persian Gulf, and two frigates, the Stark (FFG 31) and the Samuel B. Roberts (FFG 58) were damaged. American forces also got into a few engagements with the Iranians. So, what might happen if the Saudis and Iranians end up in a fight? It has happened before.

On June 5, 1984, Iranian F-4 Phantoms threatened Saudi oil fields. The Saudis scrambled F-15s to engage the Iranian planes, and downed two of them using AIM-7 Sparrow missiles. That was over 30 years ago – but the Saudis had the technological edge then, and that edge has only grown. Today, the backbone of the Saudi Air Force consist of variants of the F-15E, while Iran’s best planes are less than 30 MiG-29 Fulcrums. The Saudis, though, have been bringing the Eurofighter Typhoon into service – and have at least two squadrons in service, with more on the way.

Iran has 44 F-14 Tomcats, but these planes have been without technical support from the United States since the fall of the Shah in 1979. Most of the rest of Iran’s air force are aging F-4 Phantoms and F-5E Tigers. While Iran probably has had an easier time getting spare parts for these planes due to their widespread use across the world, these planes are still old, while the Saudis have been getting much newer jets. The Saudis have also seen combat.


If a fight breaks out, expect the Saudis to get control of the air pretty quickly. The good news is that it will also mean that Iranian surface units could also be swept from the Persian Gulf by Saudi Arabia’s air power and the Royal Saudi Navy. But that doesn’t cover the entire naval balance. The Iranian submarine force, including three Kilo-class subs and one 1200-ton Besat-class submarine. But in the narrow waters of the Persian Gulf, Iran could also deploy over two dozen smaller submarines, mostly under 600 tons displacement, and similar to North Korean designs.

While it might be tempting to disregard the midget submarines, just remember that a North Korean mini-sub about the size of the Ghadir-class minisubs was able to sink a South Korean corvette in 2010 firing a 533mm torpedo. The question then becomes one of whether the Saudis would be able to bottle up the Iranian subs in port, most likely by using mines, or if they would end up having to engage in an anti-submarine warfare (ASW) campaign. ASW is tough in the best of conditions (Winston Churchill famously noted that his only worry in World War II was “the U-boat menace”), but in the shallow waters of the Persian Gulf, it gets much more difficult, as towed-array sonars do not work. Worse, in those waters, American submarines do not have much room to operate. Iran’s subs might be small, but the Persian Gulf is a target-rich environment for them, and the confined environment leaves those targets with very few options in terms of sailing routes.

Saudi Arabia is reportedly looking to buy submarines from Germany, probably the Type 212 or 214, but those subs will be years away when they are ordered. Now that Saudi Arabia finds itself facing a conflict with Iran, it may well find that a naval deficiency could create serious problems.

http://dailycaller.com/2016/01/05/who-would-win-in-a-saudi-arabia-vs-iran-showdown/
KSA and its GCC allies will win clearly due to far superior technology and will have active support of Americans as well. Iran's military hardware is dated and cloned from 2nd or 3rd tier Soviet technology.

Yemen example against KSA is wrong because that is a gorilla war . Iran has same failure when it comes to dealing with Saudi proxies in Iraq and Syria.


face to face.. army to army it will be a merciless slaughter from air and ground. great respect to Iranian resolve and nationalism but it doesn't mean much against F-15s , Typhoons, Paladins and Abrams.
as for the midget submarines.. Saudi French origin frigates have the ability to sink them in their sub pens.
Saudis will fight from their point of advantage and we know it is the strength of their modern armed forces equipped with the most powerful western hardware money can buy. it will achieve air superiority with in days of the start of the conflict and Saudi/ GCC Navy will pretty much sink or disable entire Iranian Navy again it wont be a fair war,
what Iran has at its side is some suicidal attacks and some gorilla tactics which will have some modest tactical outcomes but wont be enough to prevent a comprehensive defeat.

as for missiles.. it might be able to fire few salvos of its Soviet/ origin 50s era missiles but they would be mostly intercepted or will have no effect even if they manage to hit the designated targets. their mobile and fixed launchers will also be taken out with or without help of American air/ space intelligence and the KSA/ GCC air force will reduce them into rubble.

if gulf war has taught us any thing it is that the technology triumphs over raw manpower.once saudi have the air superiority its game over for iran.
we should keep in mind saudia also has a standing army of 688,000
simple but brutally honest truth.
 
.
if gulf war has taught us any thing it is that the technology triumphs over raw manpower.once saudi have the air superiority its game over for iran.
we should keep in mind saudia also has a standing army of 688,000


If yemen is anything to by.... reliance on airpower and saudis ability to use them clearly displays massive deficiencies.

I for one hope SA and Iran never comes to blows and are able to resolve their differences amicably.

However purely for a academic discussion I believe Iran will come out on top. Saudis are not battle hardended, completely reliant on foreign powers for military supply and have displayed questionable tactical and operational capabilities. Saudies have gotten by on their wealth and paying others to fight on their behalf. I am unconvinced they have what it takes to actually fight a war against another bona-fide state.
 
.
KSA and its GCC allies will win clearly due to far superior technology and will have active support of Americans as well. Iran's military hardware is dated and cloned from 2nd or 3rd tier Soviet technology.

Yemen example against KSA is wrong because that is a gorilla war . Iran has same failure when it comes to dealing with Saudi proxies in Iraq and Syria.


face to face.. army to army it will be a merciless slaughter from air and ground. great respect to Iranian resolve and nationalism but it doesn't mean much against F-15s , Typhoons, Paladins and Abrams.
as for the midget submarines.. Saudi French origin frigates have the ability to sink them in their sub pens.
Saudis will fight from their point of advantage and we know it is the strength of their modern armed forces equipped with the most powerful western hardware money can buy. it will achieve air superiority with in days of the start of the conflict and Saudi/ GCC Navy will pretty much sink or disable entire Iranian Navy again it wont be a fair war,
what Iran has at its side is some suicidal attacks and some gorilla tactics which will have some modest tactical outcomes but wont be enough to prevent a comprehensive defeat.

as for missiles.. it might be able to fire few salvos of its Soviet/ origin 50s era missiles but they would be mostly intercepted or will have no effect even if they manage to hit the designated targets. their mobile and fixed launchers will also be taken out with or without help of American air/ space intelligence and the KSA/ GCC air force will reduce them into rubble.


simple but brutally honest truth.


This has to be one of the most ridiculous assessment I have read in this forum. Are you being serious or having a laugh?

This guy refers to Iranian missile as "few salvos of soviet 50's missiles" @AmirPatriot @Serpentine :lol:
I didn't know soviets in the 50's had anti ships ballistic missiles. You basically commented without botheringto do even a 1 minute long google search.

Here is the reality for you and your beloved saudis:

One has to take into account competency most of all. Not matter how generous we are in our thinking, we still would come to the conclusion that these PGCC nations are extremely incompetent.

Their airforce is basically the one thing they have. If there was ever a conflict between Iran and them, their airports and strategic sites would basically be blown to pieces in first half hour of the conflict!

Their airplanes, a cosiderable which are relatively aged (still newer than Iran's) are easy pray for Iran's integrated air defences unit. People always talk about Iran's ballistic missiles but seem to miss the point that Iran's integrated air defence is as potent as its ballistic missile probably. This air defence complex was made to counter a US strike, you think these PGCC could penetrate it? They could not even undergo their attacks on Houthis without Americans feeding them intelligence, spare parts for planes, bombs etc. :lol:

Assuming US does not get involved, Iran could turn even the Persian gulf into a non fly zone for these people with its OTH radars detecting everything over the region etc..
Without US they're just kids with expensive toys.

if gulf war has taught us any thing it is that the technology triumphs over raw manpower.once saudi have the air superiority its game over for iran.
we should keep in mind saudia also has a standing army of 688,000

Their airforce superiority means very little when all their airports will be wiped out within half hour of a potential conflict and the fact they will not be able to penetrate anywhere near Iranian airspace is another matter.

Also don't make me laugh bringing their ground forced into this. They're one of the most incompetent armies in the world.
 
.
If yemen is anything to by.... reliance on airpower and saudis ability to use them clearly displays massive deficiencies.

I for one hope SA and Iran never comes to blows and are able to resolve their differences amicably.

However purely for a academic discussion I believe Iran will come out on top. Saudis are not battle hardended, completely reliant on foreign powers for military supply and have displayed questionable tactical and operational capabilities. Saudies have gotten by on their wealth and paying others to fight on their behalf. I am unconvinced they have what it takes to actually fight a war against another bona-fide state.
yemen and iran both will be different scenarios because.destroying an mud hut is much harder than a t 72 or even s 300.reason you need extremely solid time sensitive Intel to destroy the mud hut which saudia often lacks in yemen because i hasn't deployed its ground force there yet. but to destroy t 72 all you need is a targeting pod and a brimstone.for s 300 you need HARM.scope of both wars are different my mate.hope you get the point

this topic is to wide to be discussed like this i you want further discussion why don't we do it on point to point base.raise a point and we will discuss it .

Their airforce superiority means very little when all their airports will be wiped out within half hour of a potential conflict and the fact they will not be able to penetrate anywhere near Iranian airspace is another matter.

Also don't make me laugh bringing their ground forced into this. They're one of the most incompetent armies in the world.
they have the patriots for a reason it is one of the world's best SAM and missile interceptor.and don't forget they have df 21 too so worse can be done to your airfields because you don't have proper missile shields.
nothing is impenetrable once f 14s and migs are gone sead and dead missions will decimate the air defense system.no one not even america or Russia can solely rely on SAMs for their air defense. you need the fighters to defend your air and once they are gone F15E with HARM will take the charge.after that your forces and surface navy ships are sitting ducks.

Also don't make me laugh bringing their ground forced into this. They're one of the most incompetent armies in the world.
never underestimate your enemy.
 
.
they have the patriots for a reason it is one one the world's best SAM and missile interceptor.and don't forget they have df 21 too so worse can be done to your airfields because you don't have proper missile shields.
nothing is impenetrable once f 14s and migs are gone sead and dead missions will decimate the air defense system.no one not even america or Russia can solely rely on SAMs for their air defense. you need the fighters to defend your air and once they are gone HARM will take the charge.after that your forces and surface navy ships are sitting ducks.

The problem with you people is that you simple don't have a clue what you're commenting about.

The patriot is a joke, can barely defend against some Yemeni scuds never mind missiles with manoeuvrable warheads like Iranian Emad. Try listening to actual missile experts before commenting:



The rest of your comment is ghiberish. Their airplanes would be downed long before they are in range for using their so called HARM missiles. And as I said earlier, as soon as a conflict starts, their airports etc will all be blown to pieces within half an hour if not sooner.

http://www.defensenews.com/story/de...ps-wary-eye-iranian-missile-buildup/32439137/

They only thing they have worth mentioning is airforce which even with US intelligence, spare parts etc will be nowhere near as effective as the likes of you are dreaming.

never underestimate your enemy.

We are judging them based on their demonstration in Yemen where they spend 90% of the time either getting killed or running away. Their military would still be considered incompetent even if I was extraordinary generous.
 
.
Their airplanes would be downed long before they can in range for using their so called HARM missiles
how?when there will be no plane left on your side.
They only thing they have worth mentioning is airforce which even with US intelligence, spare parts etc will be nowhere near as effective as the likes of you are dreaming.
Iraq was under the same impression.
 
.
how?when there will be no plane left.

Iranian air defence can easily cover the entire Persian gulf using is mobile air defence system with missile ranging from 200-300km in range. As I said earlier, the PGCC planes would be downed with ease.

Iraq was under the same impression.
What a dumb reply. Last I checked Iraq humiliated saudi arabia. saudi arabia is not the usa kid.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom